Most patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited. We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0.021), median duration of response (7.4 versus 9.6 months; p = 0.03), and median progression-free survival (3.2 months versus 9.0 months; p = 0.0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup. In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT.

PURPOSE: Although chimeric antigen receptor T therapy (CAR-T) cells are an established therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), there are no established models predicting outcome to identify patients who may benefit the most from CAR-T. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an international retrospective observational study including patients with RRMM infused with currently available commercial or academically produced anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T. We describe characteristics and outcomes in Europe (n = 136) and the United States (n = 133). Independent predictors of relapse/progression built a simple prediction model (Myeloma CAR-T Relapse [MyCARe] model) in the training cohort (Europe), which was externally validated (US cohort) and tested within patient- and treatment-specific subgroups. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 87% and comparable between both cohorts, and complete responses were seen in 48% (Europe) and 49% (the United States). The median time to relapse was 5 months, and early relapse <5 months from infusion showed poor survival across cohorts, with the 12-month overall survival of 30% (Europe) and 14% (the United States). The presence of extramedullary disease or plasma cell leukemia, lenalidomide-refractoriness, high-risk cytogenetics, and increased ferritin at the time of lymphodepletion were independent predictors of early relapse or progression. Each factor received one point, forming the three-tiered MyCARe model: scores 0-1 (low risk), scores 2-3 (intermediate risk), and a score of 4 (high risk). The MyCARe model was significantly associated with distinct 5-month incidence of relapse/progression ( P < .001): 7% for low-risk, 27% for intermediate-risk, and 53% for high-risk groups. The model was validated in the US cohort and maintained prognostic utility for response, survival, and outcomes across subgroups. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of patients with RRMM after CAR-T are comparable between Europe and the United States. The MyCARe model may facilitate optimal timing of CAR-T cells in patient-specific subgroups.

Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific antibody approved for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the phase I/II MajesTEC-1 trial. Herein, we report clinical outcomes with standard-of-care teclistamab in a real-world RRMM population. A total of 106 patients from five academic centers who received teclistamab from 8/2022 to 8/2023 were included in this retrospective analysis; 83% of whom would have been considered ineligible for the MajesTec-1 trial. All patients were triple-class exposed, 64% were penta-class refractory, and 53% had received prior BCMA-directed therapy. Cytokine release syndrome was observed in 64% of patients and only one event was grade ≥3, while immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was observed in 14% of patients (three events were grade 3-4). One-third (31%) of patients experienced at least one infection, with nearly half of these infections graded as severe (grade ≥3). The overall response rate (ORR) and complete or better response rate were 66% and 29%, respectively. The ORR was 47%, 59% and 68% for patients with extramedullary disease (EMD), prior BCMA-directed therapy, and penta-refractory disease, respectively. At a median follow-up of 3.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.4 months-not reached), while median overall survival was not reached. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, EMD, and age ≤70 years had inferior PFS on multivariable analysis. Our study demonstrates reasonable safety and good efficacy of teclistamab in patients with RRMM treated in the real-world setting.

PURPOSE: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), two B-cell maturation antigen–directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We compare safety, efficacy, and survival among patients with RRMM treated with standard-of-care (SOC) ide-cel or cilta-cel. METHODS: Data were from a retrospective chart review of patients with RRMM leukapheresed by December 31, 2022, with the intent to receive SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel at 19 institutions. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to compare outcomes by therapy type. RESULTS: A total of 641 patients were leukapheresed by December 31, 2022, with ide-cel (n = 386) and cilta-cel (n = 255). Five hundred eighty-six patients were infused (n = 350 for ide-cel; n = 236 for cilta-cel) with a median follow-up of 12.6 and 13.0 months for ide-cel and cilta-cel, respectively. After IPTW, patient characteristics were well balanced. Cilta-cel was associated with higher likelihood of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS; odds ratio [OR], 6.80 [95% CI, 2.28 to 20.33]), infections (OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.92]), second primary malignancies (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.89 to 3.56]), and delayed neurotoxicity (OR, 20.07 [95% CI, 4.46 to 90.20]). Cilta-cel was also associated with better treatment responses (≥complete response: OR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.63 to 3.60]), longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.63]), and longer overall survival (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97]). No associations were observed between therapy type and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, any CRS, severe cytopenia at days 30 and 90, or nonrelapse mortality. We observed consistent findings when repeating the analyses restricting the ide-cel cohort to patients infused during the same time period as Food and Drug Administration approval for cilta-cel (≥March 2022). CONCLUSION: Cilta-cel demonstrated superior efficacy and survival, with higher incidence of certain toxicities, compared with ide-cel.

The presence of extramedullary disease (EMD) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Herein, we report the outcomes of RRMM patients who were treated with standard-of-care (SOC) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and had active extraosseous EMD before the infusion. Data were retrospectively collected from patients at three US institutions with the intent to receive SOC CAR T. Responses were assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A total of 152 patients proceeded with infusion, of whom 47 (31%) had EMD (EMD group) and 105 (69%) did not (non-EMD group). Baseline patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The EMD group had a higher incidence of high-grade CRS, steroid and anakinra use, and thrombocytopenia on day +30 compared to the non-EMD group. In addition, the EMD group had an inferior overall response rate (58% vs 96%, p < 0.00001), median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs 12.4 months; p < 0.0001), and overall survival (OS) (12.2 vs 27.5 months; p = 0.00058) compared to the non-EMD group. We further subdivided the non-EMD patients into those with paramedullary disease (PMD-only group, n = 26 [17%]) and those with neither EMD nor PMD (bone marrow-contained group or BM-only group, n = 79 [52%]). Patients with PMD-only had similar median PFS (11.2 vs 13.6 months, p = 0.3798) and OS (not reached [NR] vs 27.5 months, p = 0.6446) compared to patients with BM-only disease. However, patients with EMD exhibited inferior median PFS (5.1 vs 13.6 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (12.2 vs 27.5, p = 0.0008) compared to patients in the BM-only group. Treatment with SOC CAR T yielded meaningful clinical outcomes in real-world RRMM patients with extraosseous EMD, though responses and survival outcomes were suboptimal compared to patients without EMD. The presence of only EMD but not PMD was associated with significantly worse survival outcomes following the CAR T infusion.

There is limited literature regarding outcomes in older adults and frail patients receiving BCMA directed CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. In this study, we describe the safety and efficacy of CAR T in these clinically important subgroups treated in a real-world setting. Frailty was defined using the simplified frailty index by Facon et al. (score based on age + ECOG performance status + comorbidity index; frail = score ≥2). Of the 136 patients analyzed (age range 41-81), 83 (61%) were considered frail at the time of CAR T infusion. The frail group had a high proportion of patients with renal insufficiency (18% vs 6%), high-risk cytogenetics (45% vs 35%), extramedullary disease (51% vs 43%), performance status ≥2 (18% vs 2%), and worse comorbidity index (3 vs 1). While patients in the frail group experienced more immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (39% vs 17%), incidence of all grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), as well as high grade CRS and ICANS were similar between the two groups. With a median follow up of 7 months, median progression-free survival was 6.9 months in the frail group vs 11.1 months (p=0.028) in the non-frail group. Median overall survival was 14 months in the frail group and was not reached (p=0.025) in the non-frail group. This study highlights the tolerable safety and reasonable efficacy of CAR T for frail myeloma patients in a real-world practice. While frail patients did not experience any excessive high-grade toxicities, they did have inferior efficacy outcomes.