Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors have become a key component of adjuvant treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrence. The addition of abemaciclib and ribociclib to standard endocrine therapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in invasive disease-free survival, supported by the monarchE and NATALEE trials, respectively. With expansion of patient eligibility for CDK4/6 inhibitors, multidisciplinary coordination among medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care providers is critical to optimizing patient identification, monitoring, and management of adverse events. This expert guidance document provides practical recommendations for implementing adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in routine clinical practice, incorporating insights from multiple specialties and with patient advocacy representation. Key considerations include patient selection based on clinical trial data, treatment duration, dosing schedules, adverse event profiles, monitoring requirements, drug–drug interactions, and patient-specific factors such as tolerability, cost, and quality of life. This guidance aims to support Canadian clinicians in effectively integrating CDK4/6 inhibitors into clinical practice, ensuring optimal patient outcomes through a multidisciplinary and patient-centric approach.

Half of all Canadians will develop cancer at some point in their lifetimes. These rates have increased substantially over the last decade alongside increasing effectiveness and complexity of treatment options. Therefore, the need for patients to receive both an early diagnosis and ongoing care has never been so important. In Alberta, referrals to oncology specialty care have increased 18% in the last 7 years with no commensurate increase in the number of oncology health care professionals. Challenges with oncologic care access and provider recruitment are not unique to Alberta. In 2004, Cancer Care Alberta, specifically the Cross Cancer Institute (CCI), embarked on an initiative focusing on nurse practitioner (NP) care provision, aiming to address these gaps. The purpose of this article is a description of four distinct NP care models: the Assigned model, Consultative model, Partner model, and Most Responsible Provider (MRP model) significantly contributing to enhanced and expanded cancer care delivery at CCI. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate how NPs can significantly address the rapidly expanding demands for specialist oncology care. This work highlights roles and exemplars of NP care to meet the evolving needs of cancer patients, the multidisciplinary care team and the health system.

The adjuvant treatment landscape for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC) is rapidly evolving, with a diverse range of therapeutic options—including endocrine therapies, bisphosphonates, ovarian function suppression, olaparib, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and emerging agents such as immunotherapy. While these advances have markedly improved patient outcomes, they also introduce challenges related to implementation, monitoring, and resource allocation. Notably, therapies like CDK4/6 inhibitors require particularly close monitoring, creating logistical and capacity challenges for medical oncologists, whose workloads are already stretched due to rising cancer incidence and treatment complexities. These challenges underscore the need for innovative care delivery solutions to ensure patients with EBC continue to receive optimal care. This paper offers a comprehensive guide—a playbook—of multidisciplinary-team-based care models designed to optimize adjuvant treatment delivery in EBC. Drawing on real-world evidence and successful applications across Canadian centers, we explore models led by nurses, nurse practitioners (NPs), general practitioners in oncology (GPO), and pharmacists. Each model leverages the unique expertise of its team to manage treatment toxicities, facilitate adherence, and enhance patient education, thereby promoting effective and sustainable care delivery. Importantly, these models are not intended to compete with one another, but rather to serve as a flexible recipe book from which breast cancer care teams can draw strategies tailored to their local resources and patient needs. By detailing implementation strategies, benefits, and challenges—in many instances supported by quantitative metrics and economic evaluations—this work aims to inspire care teams nationwide to optimize the adjuvant management of patients with HR+, HER2– EBC.