Gang Bao

Dr. Gang Bao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 March 2016 in Nanomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNazanin Hoshyar
Nazanin Hoshyar
SGSamantha Gray
Samantha Gray
HHHongbin Han
Hongbin Han
GBGang Bao
Gang Bao
Nanoparticle-based technologies offer exciting new approaches to disease diagnostics and therapeutics. To take advantage of unique properties of nanoscale materials and structures, the size, shape and/or surface chemistry of nanoparticles need to be optimized, allowing their functionalities to be tailored for different biomedical applications. Here we review the effects of nanoparticle size on cellular interaction and in vivo pharmacokinetics, including cellular uptake, biodistribution and circulation half-life of nanoparticles. Important features of nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging and modeling of nanoparticle size effects are also discussed.

8 August 2015 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZSulin Zhang
Sulin Zhang
HGHuajian Gao
Huajian Gao
GBGang Bao
Gang Bao

22 June 2017 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHong-Xia Wang
Hong-Xia Wang
Mingqiang LiMingqiang Li
Mingqiang Li
CLCiaran M. Lee
Ciaran M. Lee
SCSyandan Chakraborty
Syandan Chakraborty
Hae-Won KimHae-Won Kim
Hae-Won Kim
KLKam W Leong
Kam W Leong

21 June 2017 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSheng Tong
Sheng Tong
CQChristopher A. Quinto
Christopher A. Quinto
LZLinlin Zhang
Linlin Zhang
PMPriya Mohindra
Priya Mohindra
GBGang Bao
Gang Bao

1 March 2016 in Molecular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCiaran M Lee
Ciaran M Lee
TCThomas J Cradick
Thomas J Cradick
GBGang Bao
Gang Bao
The clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)—CRISPR-associated (Cas) system from Streptococcus pyogenes (Spy) has been successfully adapted for RNA-guided genome editing in a wide range of organisms. However, numerous reports have indicated that Spy CRISPR-Cas9 systems may have significant off-target cleavage of genomic DNA sequences differing from the intended on-target site. Here, we report the performance of the Neisseria meningitidis (Nme) CRISPR-Cas9 system that requires a longer protospacer-adjacent motif for site-specific cleavage, and present a comparison between the Spy and Nme CRISPR-Cas9 systems targeting the same protospacer sequence. The results with the native crRNA and tracrRNA as well as a chimeric single guide RNA for the Nme CRISPR-Cas9 system were also compared. Our results suggest that, compared with the Spy system, the Nme CRISPR-Cas9 system has similar or lower on-target cleavage activity but a reduced overall off-target effect on a genomic level when sites containing three or fewer mismatches are considered. Thus, the Nme CRISPR-Cas9 system may represent a safer alternative for precision genome engineering applications.

1 June 2020 in Molecular Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAng Li
Ang Li
MTMark R. Tanner
Mark R. Tanner
CLCiaran M. Lee
Ciaran M. Lee
AHAyrea E. Hurley
Ayrea E. Hurley
MGMarco De Giorgi
Marco De Giorgi
WLWilliam R. Lagor
William R. Lagor
Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are a leading candidate for the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for therapeutic genome editing in vivo. However, AAV-based delivery involves persistent expression of the Cas9 nuclease, a bacterial protein. Recent studies indicate a high prevalence of neutralizing antibodies and T cells specific to the commonly used Cas9 orthologs from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) and Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) in humans. We tested in a mouse model whether pre-existing immunity to SaCas9 would pose a barrier to liver genome editing with AAV packaging CRISPR-Cas9. Although efficient genome editing occurred in mouse liver with pre-existing SaCas9 immunity, this was accompanied by an increased proportion of CD8+ T cells in the liver. This cytotoxic T cell response was characterized by hepatocyte apoptosis, loss of recombinant AAV genomes, and complete elimination of genome-edited cells, and was followed by compensatory liver regeneration. Our results raise important efficacy and safety concerns for CRISPR-Cas9-based in vivo genome editing in the liver.