Background/Objectives: Ovarian and endometrial cancers present significant health burdens due to their substantial morbidity and mortality. Surgery delay is hypothesized to negatively impact patient outcomes, yet evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate current evidence regarding the effects of treatment delay on survival and quality of life in these patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, complemented by a manual screening of reference lists, with studies included up to March 2025. Two independent reviewers screened and assessed the methodological quality using the ROBINS-E tool and extracted the data from the studies. Due to substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity, results were synthesized qualitatively through narrative synthesis. Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising predominantly retrospective cohort analyses. Treatment delays consistently correlated with decreased survival and advanced disease stages. Among studies, optimal intervals from diagnosis to treatment were varied from 2 to 8 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes indicated heightened anxiety, increased distress, and poor satisfaction with prolonged delays. Healthcare system factors such as resource allocation, geographic disparities, and socioeconomic inequalities significantly contributed to delays. Quantitative survival metrics supported a clear negative association between treatment delays and survival, although paradoxical outcomes in select subgroups highlighted underlying complexities. Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the critical importance of minimizing delays in the treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancers to improve patient survival and psychological outcomes. Identified healthcare system barriers demand targeted policy interventions to ensure timely and equitable access to tertiary healthcare infrastructures. Future research should prioritize standardizing delay definitions to strengthen and homogenize evidence.

(1) Background: Hudson first described the procedure that includes en-block removal of an ovarian tumor fixed in the pelvis with the whole pelvic peritoneum and invaded surrounding structures. However, sometimes pelvic peritonectomy (PP) with or without shaving of the bowel serosa is not enough to achieve complete cytoreduction, and en-block rectosigmoid resection (RR) is necessary. This study aims to investigate the impact of bowel surgery on survival rates and morbidity of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced ovarian cancer with cul-de-sac involvement that underwent debulking surgery at the 1st Department of Obstetrics—Gynecology of “Papageorgiou” General Hospital, from 2017–2022. The primary outcomes were the survival rates and morbidity between PP and RR. (3) Results: A total of 93 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group A (34 patients) with RR and Group B (59 patients) with PP. There was no statistically significant difference in the majority of patients’ characteristics and oncological outcomes. On the other hand, patients with RR had a significantly higher surgical complexity score (SCS), peritoneal cancer index (PCI), ICU admission, rate of postoperative complications, longer surgery duration and hospital stay. When comparing the duration of surgery, the RR group has significantly higher operation time during primary compared to interval debulking surgery. Concerning survival rates, there was no significant difference in progression-free (PFS) (p = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.85) between the two groups, while residual disease and postoperative complications were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS; (4) Conclusions: The modified Hudson procedure with RR is a safe and reproductible technique, but when complete gross resection can be achieved with PP, this technique is preferred in order to avoid increased patient’s morbidity.