Is age of menarche (AOM) associated with subfecundity and/or infertility in adulthood? A late onset of menarche was associated with a slightly increased risk of subfecundity and infertility. Abnormal age at onset of menarche is a risk factor for several diseases later in life, but the effect on infertility is unknown. A cohort study of 73 107 pregnant Danish women enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) between 1996 and 2002 with self-reported data on AOM and waiting time to pregnancy (TTP). Information on AOM and TTP was collected through a computer-assisted telephone interview scheduled in pregnancy Week 12. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariate logistic regression with TTP categorized as subfecundity (TTP ≥6 months) and infertility (TTP >12 months). Multiple imputation was performed to account for missing data. We found trends towards higher odds of subfecundity and infertility with increasing age of menarche, using 13 years as the starting point. Among women reaching menarche at 15 years, the odds for subfecundity were 1.09 (95% CI: 1.03–1.15), and 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09–1.25) for women reaching menarche later than 15 years compared with the reference group of girls reaching menarche at 13 years. Additionally, women reaching menarche older than 15 years had an OR of infertility of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.08–1.29). Women younger than 11 years at menarche had lower odds of subfecundity. The results were generally attenuated when adjusting for women's age of pregnancy, but the significant positive trend of higher OR for subfecundity persisted, as did the higher OR for subfecundity among women experiencing menarche older than 15 years. We used retrospectively collected self-reported information on AOM and TTP. Information on male factors was limited in this cohort. We only included pregnant women and have therefore no data on women with untreated and unsuccessfully treated infertility, limiting the generalizability to women who became pregnant. This study indicates that the onset of menarche at 15 years or later is associated with subfecundity and infertility. The Danish National Research Foundation has established the Danish Epidemiology Science Centre that initiated and created the DNBC. The cohort is furthermore a result of a major grant from this Foundation. Additional support for the DNBC is obtained from the Pharmacy Foundation, the Egmont Foundation, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation and the Health Foundation. This specific study was supported by a scholarship from the Ministry of Science and Innovation. No conflict of interest declared.

Does moderate alcohol intake affect menstrual cycle characteristics among women in the Danish population? Levels of alcohol exposure as seen in this study do not substantially affect the menstrual cycle. Animal studies indicate alcohol-induced disruptions of the reproductive system, but previous epidemiological studies addressing the possible association between alcohol intake and the menstrual cycle are sparse. A cross-sectional study with retrospectively collected data including 82 146 pregnant Danish women in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) enrolled during the years 1996–2002. Information on weekly alcohol consumption and menstrual cycle characteristics before pregnancy was obtained through a computer-assisted telephone interview in pregnancy Week 12–16. The associations between weekly alcohol consumption and menstrual cycle irregularity (≥7 days difference between cycles) and length (short cycle: ≤24 days, long cycle: ≥32 days) were analysed using logistic regression with weekly alcohol intake categorized into abstainers (0 drinks per week), low (0.5–2.0 drinks per week), moderate (2.5–14.0 drinks per week) and high (14.0–86.5 drinks per week). Estimates are given as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The overall participation rate was 60% of the women invited. We found that a high weekly alcohol consumption was not associated with menstrual cycle disturbances. We observed higher odds of irregular and short cycles among abstainers when compared with women with a low weekly alcohol consumption, but found no trend of more cycle disturbances with higher alcohol consumption. Possible limitations in our study include a risk of selection bias due to the moderate participation rate and the use of retrospective information on alcohol exposure and menstrual cycle characteristics before getting pregnant. The higher odds of irregular and short cycles among abstainers may reflect other health problems in these women rather than an actual effect of alcohol on the menstrual cycle. The generalizability of the study results is restricted to women who manage to conceive and women who do not use oral contraceptives within 2 months before getting pregnant. This study suggests that the menstrual cycle is not substantially affected by higher alcohol consumption among the participating women. Supported by a scholarship from Aarhus University Research Foundation. The Danish National Research Foundation has established the Danish Epidemiology Science Centre that initiated and created the DNBC. The cohort is furthermore a result of a major grant from this Foundation. Additional support for the DNBC is obtained from the Pharmacy Foundation, the Egmont Foundation, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation and the Health Foundation. No conflict of interest declared.

Background: Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological cancer, primarily due to its asymptomatic nature in early stages and consequent late diagnosis. Early detection improves survival, but current biomarkers lack sensitivity and specificity. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released from tumor cells captures tumor-associated epigenetic alterations and represents a promising source for minimally invasive biomarkers. Among these, aberrant DNA methylation occurs early in tumorigenesis and may reflect underlying disease biology. This study aimed to investigate genome-wide cfDNA methylation profiles in patients with ovarian cancer, benign ovarian conditions, and healthy controls to identify cancer-associated methylation patterns that may inform future biomarker development. Results: We performed genome-wide cfDNA methylation profiling using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) on plasma samples from 40 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, 38 patients with benign ovarian conditions, and 38 healthy postmenopausal women. A total of 536 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified between ovarian cancer and controls (n = 76), with 97% showing hypermethylation in ovarian cancer. DMRs were enriched in CpG islands and gene bodies and depleted in repetitive elements, consistent with known cancer-associated methylation patterns. Fifteen genes showed robust hypermethylation across analyses. These genes exhibited methylation across intronic, exonic, and upstream regulatory regions. Separate comparisons of ovarian cancer to each control group (benign and healthy) supported the reproducibility of these findings. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed enrichment in gland development, embryonic morphogenesis, and endocrine regulation, suggesting biological relevance to ovarian tumorigenesis. Conclusions: This study identifies consistent cfDNA hypermethylation patterns in ovarian cancer, affecting genes involved in developmental regulation and hormone-related processes. Our findings underscore the potential of cfMeDIP-seq for detecting tumor-specific methylation signatures in plasma and highlight these 15 hypermethylated genes as biologically relevant targets for future studies on cfDNA methylation in ovarian cancer.