Melanoma remains mostly an untreatable fatal disease despite advances in decoding cancer genomics and developing new therapeutic modalities. Progress in patient care would benefit from additional predictive models germane for human disease mechanisms, tumor heterogeneity, and therapeutic responses. Toward this aim, this review documents comparative aspects of human and naturally occurring canine melanomas. Clinical presentation, pathology, therapies, and genetic alterations are highlighted in the context of current basic and translational research in comparative oncology. Somewhat distinct from sun exposure-related human cutaneous melanomas, there is growing evidence that a variety of gene copy number alterations and protein structure/function mutations play roles in canine melanomas, in circumstances more analogous to human mucosal melanomas and to some extent other melanomas with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-Ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS), and neurofibromin 1 tumor suppressor NF1 triple wild-type genotype. Gaps in canine genome annotation, as well as an insufficient number and depth of sequences covered, remain considerable barriers to progress and should be collectively addressed. Preclinical approaches can be designed to include canine clinical trials addressing immune modulation as well as combined-targeted inhibition of Rat Sarcoma Superfamily/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS/MAPK) and/or Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B/Mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) signal transduction, pathways frequently activated in both human and canine melanomas. Future investment should be aimed towards improving understanding of canine melanoma as a predictive preclinical surrogate for human melanoma and for mutually benefiting these uniquely co-dependent species.
Background/objective: Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a poorly responsive, rare and aggressive subtype with few cases having targetable recurrent driver mutations, although Ras/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activations are common. Eventual tumor evasion of targeted therapy continues to limit treatment success. Adequate models are necessary to address therapeutic resistance. The relatively greater incidence of naturally occurring MM in dogs, as well as its comparable clinical and pathological characteristics to human MM, represents an opportunity for study as a human MM patient surrogate. Resistance-promoting crosstalk between Ras/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling under trametinib inhibition of MEK was studied in canine MM. Emphasis was placed on the suppressive effect of trametinib on cell cycle entry and its potential role in drug resistance. Methods: D-type cyclins were investigated following trametinib treatment of five MM cell lines exhibiting differential drug sensitivities. Signaling pathway activation, proliferation, survival, cell death, and cell cycle were analyzed in the context of D-type cyclin expression. Cyclin D2 expression was manipulated using siRNA knockdown or inducible recombinant overexpression. Results: Trametinib diminished cyclin D1 in all cell lines. While relatively trametinib-resistant MM cells exhibited capacity to upregulate cyclin D2, which promoted proliferation, sensitive MM cells lacked similar cyclin D2 compensation. Inhibition of the compensatory cyclin D2 in resistant cells conferred sensitivity. Induced cyclin D2 overexpression in otherwise trametinib-sensitive MM cells promoted survival. Upregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling under trametinib treatment was suppressed by mTORC1/2 inhibition, which similarly diminished cyclin D2 response. Conclusions: The compensatory switch from preferential reliance on cyclin D1 to D2 plays a role in MM resistance to MEK inhibition.