Metastatic dissemination defines a complex phenomenon driven by genetic forces and, importantly, determined by interaction between cancer cells and the surrounding stroma. Although the biologic and immune reactions which characterize the process have been widely and extensively evaluated, fewer data are available regarding the mechanical and physical forces to which circulating neoplastic clones are exposed. It should be hypothesized that this interaction can be modified in case of concomitant pathologic conditions, such as chronic vasculopathy, which frequently occurs in lung cancer patients. We here aim at analyzing and discussing the complex interplay between lung malignant transformation and arteriopathy, mainly focusing on the immune–inflammatory systemic reaction. Notably—in most instances—smoking-related fixed airflow obstruction, including but not limited to COPD, frequently coexists and contributes to both tumor progression and vascular complications. Attention is paid mainly to the analysis of the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their interaction with triple bronchodilation and antiaggregants. Understanding the biomechanical and molecular dynamics of lung cancer progression in altered vascular territories has several translational implications in defining risk stratification and in surgical planning and therapeutic targeting. Moreover, computational modeling of the physical forces which regulate the transit and extravasation of metastatic clones in altered contexts could be of help in deciphering the whole process and in determining more effective blockade strategies.

Specific molecular and inflammatory endotypes have been identified for chronic respiratory disorders, including asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). These endotypes correspond with clinical aspects of disease, enabling targeted medicines to address certain pathophysiologic pathways, often referred to as “precision medicine”. With respect to bronchiectasis, many comorbidities and underlying causes have been identified. Inflammatory endotypes have also been widely studied and reported. Additionally, several genes have been shown to affect disease progression. However, the lack of a clear classification has also hampered our understanding of the disease’s natural course. The aim of this review is, thus, to summarize the current knowledge on biomarkers and actionable targets of this complex pathologic condition and to point out unmet needs, which are required in the design of effective diagnostic and therapeutic trials.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most common sleep disorders in the general population. It is characterized by recurrent alterations in nocturnal oxygenation, which have wide-ranging consequences on health. Beyond its well-established links to cardiovascular, neurocognitive, and metabolic diseases, recent evidence suggests a possible association between OSA and cancer, particularly lung cancer, one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The advent of immunotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for lung cancer patients in both early and advanced stages. However, immunotherapy is frequently associated with endocrine toxicities, which may overlap or interact with the metabolic alterations observed in OSA. This perspective aims to emphasize the clinical relevance of diagnosing and treating OSA in lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy, as proper management could help optimize both therapeutic efficacy and overall health.

Background: Scedosporium apiospermum is a filamentous fungus increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised hosts, though rare infections in immunocompetent individuals with structural lung disease have been reported. Its diagnosis and management remain challenging due to non-specific clinical presentation and intrinsic resistance to multiple antifungal agents. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 66-year-old immunocompetent woman with idiopathic bilateral non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, who presented with subacute cough and increased sputum production. Chest high-resolution CT revealed new subsolid and ground-glass infiltrates superimposed on stable bronchiectatic changes. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures isolated S. apiospermum as the sole pathogen. The patient was treated with oral voriconazole (200 mg BID) for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week course of aerosolized amphotericin B. Clinical and radiological improvement was observed, and no relapse occurred during follow-up. Discussion: This case highlights the potential for S. apiospermum to cause clinically relevant pulmonary infection in structurally abnormal but immunocompetent lungs. Non-CF bronchiectasis may facilitate fungal colonization due to impaired mucociliary clearance and chronic mucus retention. Combined antifungal therapy involving systemic voriconazole and inhaled amphotericin B (though not yet standardized) was employed based on clinical rationale and the available literature, resulting in favorable outcomes. Conclusions:S. apiospermum pulmonary infection, although rare in immunocompetent hosts with bronchiectasis, should be considered in cases of new or persistent infiltrates. Early recognition and individualized antifungal strategies, including the potential role of inhaled agents, may improve clinical outcomes. This case reinforces the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the management of complex fungal infections in chronic airway disease.

Background: Exophiala dermatitidis is a dematiaceous, thermotolerant, yeast-like fungus increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen in chronic airway diseases. While commonly associated with cystic fibrosis, its clinical significance in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) remains unclear. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 66-year-old immunocompetent woman with a history of breast cancer in remission and NCFB, who presented with chronic cough and dyspnea. Chest CT revealed bilateral bronchiectasis with new pseudonodular opacities. Bronchoalveolar lavage cultures identified E. dermatitidis, along with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Given clinical stability and the absence of systemic signs, initial therapy included oral voriconazole, levofloxacin, doxycycline, and inhaled amikacin. Despite persistent fungal isolation on repeat bronchoscopy, the patient remained asymptomatic with stable radiologic and functional findings. Antifungal therapy was discontinued, and the patient continued under close monitoring. The patient exhibited clinical and radiological stability despite repeated fungal isolation, reinforcing the hypothesis of persistent colonization rather than active infection. Discussion: This case underscores the diagnostic challenges in distinguishing fungal colonization from true infection in structurally abnormal lungs. In NCFB, disrupted mucociliary clearance and microbial dysbiosis may facilitate fungal persistence, even in the absence of overt immunosuppression. The detection of E. dermatitidis should prompt a comprehensive evaluation, integrating clinical, radiologic, and microbiologic data to guide management. Voriconazole is currently the antifungal agent of choice, though therapeutic thresholds and duration remain undefined. Conclusions: This report highlights the potential role of E. dermatitidis as an under-recognized respiratory pathogen in NCFB and the importance of a multidisciplinary, individualized approach to diagnosis and treatment. This case underscores the need for further research on fungal colonization in NCFB and the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the pathogenic significance, optimal management, and long-term outcomes of E. dermatitidis in non-CF chronic lung diseases.

Metastatic dissemination defines a complex phenomenon driven by genetic forces and importantly determined by interaction between cancer cells and the surrounding stroma. Although the biologic and immune reactions which characterize the process have been widely and extensively evaluated, fewer data are available regarding the mechanic and physical forces to which circulating neoplastic clones are exposed. It should be hypothesized that this interaction can be modified in case of concomitant pathologic conditions, such as chronic vasculopathy which frequently occurs in lung cancer patients. We here aim at analysing and discussing the complex interplay between lung malignant transformation and artheriopathy, mainly focusing on the immune-inflammatory sistemic reaction. Notably - in most instances – smoking history and a consequent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohexists. A main attention is payed to the analysis of the role of immunecheckpoint inhibitors and their interaction with triple bronchodilation and antiaggreagants. Understanding the biomechanical and molecular dynamics of lung cancer progression in altered vascular territories has several translational implications in defining risk stratification, in surgical planning and therapeutic targeting: Moreover, computational modelling of the physical forces which regulate the transit and extravasation of metastatic clones in altered contexts could be of help in deciphering the whole process and in determining more effective blockade strategies.