Youngmee Kim

Dr. Youngmee Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2005 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFrederick M. E. Grouzet
Frederick M. E. Grouzet
TKTim Kasser
Tim Kasser
AAAaron Ahuvia
Aaron Ahuvia
JDJosé Miguel Fernández Dols
José Miguel Fernández Dols
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
KSKennon M. Sheldon
Kennon M. Sheldon
The authors investigated the structure of goal contents in a group of 1,854 undergraduates from 15 cultures around the world. Results suggested that the 11 types of goals the authors assessed were consistently organized in a circumplex fashion across the 15 cultures. The circumplex was well described by positioning 2 primary dimensions underlying the goals: intrinsic (e.g., self-acceptance, affiliation) versus extrinsic (e.g., financial success, image) and self-transcendent (e.g., spirituality) versus physical (e.g., hedonism). The circumplex model of goal contents was also quite similar in both wealthier and poorer nations, although there were some slight cross-cultural variations. The relevance of these results for several theories of motivation and personality are discussed.

1 June 2008 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
BGBarbara A. Given
Barbara A. Given

17 April 2008 in Journal of Aging and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
RSRichard Schulz
Richard Schulz
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of cancer from family caregivers' perspective, based on a comparative analysis of caregiving burden and distress, among four types of caregivers. Methods: The sample included caregivers of persons with cancer, dementia, diabetes, or frail elderly from a nationally representative sample of 606 caregivers. Results: Although the four different types of caregivers were comparable in most sociodemographic characteristics, caregiving involvement and caregiving outcomes differed among the caregiving groups. Both cancer and dementia caregivers reported greater levels of physical burden and psychological distress than other caregivers, after controlling for sociodemographic and caregiving involvement (i.e., level of burden and caregiving duration) factors. Discussion: The comparative analysis provided a systematic review of cancer caregiving in the context of three other types of caregiving. Given the high levels of burden and distress, greater emphasis should be placed on developing social service policy and practice for cancer caregivers.

1 November 2001 in Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAndrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot
VCValary I. Chirkov
Valary I. Chirkov
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
KSKennon M. Sheldon
Kennon M. Sheldon

4 September 2009 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KYK. Robin Yabroff
K. Robin Yabroff
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, little work has been done to estimate the time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors.METHODS: Data from a national survey of caregivers of cancer patients in 2003 to 2006 were used to estimate the time associated with informal caregiving in the 2 years after patient diagnosis with bladder, breast, colorectal, kidney, lung, melanoma of the skin, ovarian, prostate, or uterine cancer, or non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). Caregivers reported the duration and daily intensity of caregiving as well as the types and frequency of support provided. The median wage rate in 2006 ($16.28) was used to value caregiver time, and other methods to value time were evaluated with sensitivity analyses.RESULTS: On average, caregivers provided care for 8.3 hours per day for 13.7 months. The number of months and daily hours spent caregiving were the highest for cancer survivors diagnosed with distant disease compared with survivors with regional or localized disease (P < .05). Approximately half of caregivers provided emotional, instrumental, tangible, or medical support, although the frequency varied dramatically. Informal caregiver time costs over the 2‐year period after diagnosis were the highest for caregivers of patients diagnosed with lung ($72,702; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], $56,814‐$88,590) and ovarian ($66,210; 95% CI, $40,750‐$91,670) cancers and NHL ($59,613; 95% CI, $43,423‐$75,803) and the lowest for caregivers of patients with breast cancer ($38,334; 95% CI, $31,442‐$45,226).CONCLUSIONS: Time spent by informal caregivers was substantial and was an important component of the burden of cancer care. Incorporation of the value of informal caregiver time will be important when evaluating the costs and benefits of cancer control interventions. Cancer 2009;115(18 suppl):4362–73. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

1 March 2004 in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKennon M. Sheldon
Kennon M. Sheldon
AEAndrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot
RRRichard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan
VCValery Chirkov
Valery Chirkov
YKYoungmee Kim
Youngmee Kim
ZSZhigang Sun
Zhigang Sun
Sheldon and colleagues have recently focused research attention on the concept of self-concordance, in which people feel that they pursue their goals because the goals fit with their underlying interests and values rather than because others say they should pursue them. Self-concordant individuals typically evidence higher subjective well-being (SWB). But is this also true in non-Western cultures, which emphasize people’s duty to conform to societal expectations and group-centered norms? To address this question, this study assessed goal self-concordance and SWB in four different cultures. U.S., Chinese, and South Korean samples evidenced equal levels of self-concordance, whereas a Taiwanese sample evidenced somewhat less self-concordance. More importantly, self-concordance predicted SWB within every culture. It appears that “owning one’s actions”—that is, feeling that one’s goals are consistent with the self—may be important for most if not all humans.