John Seeley

Dr. John Seeley


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 March 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJeannette Milgrom
Jeannette Milgrom
BDBrian G Danaher
Brian G Danaher
AGAlan W. Gemmill
Alan W. Gemmill
CHCharlene Holt
Charlene Holt
CHChristopher J Holt
Christopher J Holt
JEJennifer Ericksen
Jennifer Ericksen
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

8 December 2021 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJeannette Milgrom
Jeannette Milgrom
BDBrian G Danaher
Brian G Danaher
JSJohn Seeley
John Seeley
CHChristopher J Holt
Christopher J Holt
CHCharlene Holt
Charlene Holt
AGAlan W. Gemmill
Alan W. Gemmill
Background: Previous research has confirmed that symptoms of postnatal depression (PND) can be ameliorated through internet-delivered psychological interventions. Advantages of internet-delivered treatment include anonymity, convenience, and catering to women who are unable to access face-to-face (FTF) treatments. To date, no research has examined the efficacy of such interventions compared directly with FTF treatments in women clinically diagnosed with PND.Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy of one of the first web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions (internet CBT+coach calls) for PND (MumMoodBooster [MMB]) with FTF-CBT in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).Methods: In this study, 116 postnatal women with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of major or minor depression were randomized to MMB (39/116, 33.6%), FTF-CBT (39/116, 33.6%), or a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition (38/116, 32.8%). Diagnostic status was determined at baseline and at 21-week follow-up using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV. Severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms was evaluated using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and the revised Beck Depression Inventory at baseline, 12-week follow-up (after treatment), and 21-week follow-up.Results: Of the 116 participants, 107 (92.2%) had a diagnosis of major depression at baseline. Rates of remission from a major or minor depressive episode at 21 weeks in both the FTF-CBT and MMB groups were superior to that of the TAU group (56.6% and 47.7% less likely to be depressed, respectively) and they were not significantly different from each other. Although remission rates differed between TAU and FTF-CBT, growth models showed that, in terms of symptom reduction across time, the FTF-CBT treatment was not significantly better than TAU. By comparison, MMB was statistically superior to both TAU and FTF-CBT in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress from baseline to the 21-week follow-up (large and moderate effect sizes). Thus, after 21 weeks, the average symptom scores for depression and anxiety of women receiving MMB were approximately half those of women in both the TAU and FTF-CBT groups.Conclusions: In this RCT, MMB was at least as effective as FTF-CBT in achieving remission from a diagnosed PND episode. MMB was superior to TAU and FTF-CBT in encouraging and maintaining reduction of symptom severity over the 21-week follow-up for depressed postnatal women. These findings replicate results of prior studies on MMB that showed clinically significant improvements in depressive symptoms, and they provide direct empirical support that internet-delivered treatment for depressed postnatal women is a viable alternative to FTF treatment. The generalizability of the results needs to be examined in future research, as RCTs of internet-based versus FTF treatments necessarily involve a subset of people who are willing to undertake either modality of treatment.Trial Registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12613000881730; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364683&isReview=true

1 July 2016 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRichard F. Farmer
Richard F. Farmer
JGJeff M. Gau
Jeff M. Gau
JSJohn Seeley
John Seeley
DKDerek Kosty
Derek Kosty
KSKenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher
PLPeter M. Lewinsohn
Peter M. Lewinsohn

6 June 2019 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BDBrian G Danaher
Brian G Danaher
MTMilagra S Tyler
Milagra S Tyler
RCRyann C Crowley
Ryann C Crowley
HBHåvar Brendryen
Håvar Brendryen
JSJohn Seeley
John Seeley
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

1 January 2019 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJohn Seeley
John Seeley
RFRichard F. Farmer
Richard F. Farmer
DKDerek B. Kosty
Derek B. Kosty
JGJeff M. Gau
Jeff M. Gau

7 June 2013 in Advances in School Mental Health Promotion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAndy J. Frey
Andy J. Frey
JLJon Lee
Jon Lee
JSJason W. Small
Jason W. Small
JSJohn Seeley
John Seeley
HWHill M. Walker
Hill M. Walker
EFEDWARD FEIL
EDWARD FEIL
There is a critical need to engage theory-driven research related to the deployment of mental health promotion initiatives and student outcomes. A growing body of research supporting the use of motivational interviewing and engagement strategies in education suggests that this approach may be promising to better understand mechanisms through which coaches, mentors or consultants influence the change in behaviour and improve the implementation of effective practices. Motivational interviewing is a specific approach to engagement that works to raise motivation for fostering change, and may also serve as a useful approach for maximizing teachers' roles within school-based mental health promotion efforts. In this article, we describe the Motivational Interviewing Navigation Guide (MING), which consists of a five-step process to motivate teachers to implement critical features of an intervention with fidelity. In addition, the potential barriers to implement the MING approach, as well as recommendations for future research were discussed.