To identify systematic biases across groups in objectively and subjectively measured sleep duration. We investigated concordance of self-reported habitual sleep duration compared with actigraphy- and single-night in-home polysomnography (PSG) across white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Among 1910 adults, self-reported sleep duration, determined by differences between bed and wake times, was overestimated in all racial groups compared with PSG and actigraphy. Compared with whites (ρ = 0.45), correlations were significantly lower only in blacks (ρ = 0.28). Self-reporting bias for total sleep time compared with wrist actigraphy was 66 min (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61–71) for whites, 58 min (95% CI: 48–69) for blacks, 66 min (95% CI: 57–74) for Hispanics, and 60 min (95% CI: 49–70) for Chinese adults. Compared with PSG, self-reporting bias in whites at 73 min (95% CI: 67–79) was higher than in blacks (54 min [95% CI: 42–65]) and Chinese (49 min [95% CI: 37–61]) but not different from Hispanics (67 min [95% CI: 56–78]). Slight agreement/concordance was observed between self-reported and actigraphy-based total sleep time (k_w = 0.14 for whites, 0.10 for blacks, 0.17 for Hispanics, and 0.11 for Chinese) and PSG (k_w = 0.08 for whites, 0.04 for blacks, 0.05 for Hispanics, and 0.01 for Chinese) across race/ethnicity. Self-reported sleep duration overestimated objectively measured sleep across all races, and compared with PSG, overestimation is significantly greater in whites compared with blacks. Larger reporting bias reduces the ability to identify significant associations between sleep duration and health among blacks compared with whites. Sleep measurement property differences should be considered when comparing sleep indices across racial/ethnic groups.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major source of morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Magnesium, phosphorus, and calcium are m

Rationale: Growing evidence suggests that compromised lung health may be linked to dementia and worsening cognitive ability. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that impaired lung function or lung disease in midlife is associated with greater risk of incident dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) later in life. Methods: A total of 14,184 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants who underwent spirometry and were asked about lung health (1987–1989) were followed. Dementia and MCI were defined by hospitalization diagnosis codes (1987–2013) in the whole cohort and with adjudication among 42% who attended a comprehensive neurocognitive examination (2011–2013). Measurements and Main Results: In analysis using adjudicated outcomes, odds of dementia or MCI were higher among participants with restrictive (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.19) and obstructive lung disease (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.64), compared with those without disease or respiratory symptoms. Associations were similar in analyses restricted to nonsmokers, and present for both Alzheimer’s disease–related dementia and cerebrovascular etiologies. Low FEV₁% predicted and FVC% predicted were also associated with increased dementia risk. Conclusions: Midlife lung disease and reduced lung function were associated with modestly increased odds of dementia and MCI later in life. Magnitudes of association were more pronounced for restrictive impairment than for obstructive lung disease. These associations were present in smokers and nonsmokers. If the observed associations are causal, policy and public health efforts to reduce smoking and improve air quality may have the added benefit of preventing the development of dementia and MCI.