Forest soils play a key role in the global carbon (C) pool and in mitigating climate change. The mechanisms by which understory and litter management affect soil organic C (SOC) concentrations are unclear in subtropical forests. We collected soils along a 60 cm profile in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation treated by only aboveground litter removal and understory vegetation preservation (Only-ALR), both aboveground litter and understory vegetation removal (ALR+UVR), and both aboveground litter and understory vegetation preservation (control) for 7 consecutive years. Five SOC fractions, physico-chemical properties, the biomass of microbial communities and the activities of C-acquiring enzymes were measured, and their correlations were analyzed for each of four soil layers (0–10, 10–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm). Compared with control, Only-ALR decreased labile C pool I (LP-C I), labile C pool II (LP-C II) and dissolved organic C (DOC) in topsoil (0–20 cm) but had no effect on soil C fractions in subsoil (20–60 cm). A higher fungi and bacteria biomass in LP-C II and microbial biomass C (MBC) stock was observed in Only-ALR compared to ALR+UVR treatment. Soil pH and Gram-positive bacteria generally had impact on the variation of soil C fractions in topsoil and subsoil, respectively. Understory vegetation preservation offsets the declines of SOC and recalcitrant C but not the decreases in labile C caused by aboveground litter removal. Understory vegetation helps sustain SOC stock mainly via decreased C input and elevated soil pH which would change microbial biomass and activities when litter is removed. Our findings highlight the potential influence of long-term understory manipulation practices on C pool within a soil profile in subtropical plantation forests.

Understanding the interplay between plant leaf functional traits and plant and soil factors under different soil thicknesses is significant for quantifying the interaction between plant growth and the environment. However, in the context of ecological restoration of vegetation in mining areas, there has been a lot of research on trees, shrubs, and grasses, but the characteristics and correlations of leaf functional traits of vines have not been fully studied to a large extent. Here, we report the differences in leaf functional traits of six vine plants (Parthenocissus quinquefolia, Pueraria lobata, Hedera nepalensis, Campsis grandiflora, Mucuna sempervirens, and Parthenocissus tricuspidata) with distinct growth forms in different soil cover thicknesses (20 cm, 40 cm, and 60 cm). In addition, soil factor indicators under different soil cover thicknesses were measured to elucidate the linkages between leaf functional traits of vine plants and soil factors. We found that P. lobata showed a resource acquisition strategy, while H. nepalensis demonstrated a resource conservation strategy. C. grandiflora and P. tricuspidata shifted toward more conservative resource allocation strategies as the soil cover thickness increased, whereas M. sempervirens showed the opposite trend. In the plant trait–trait relationships, there were synergistic associations between specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf nitrogen content (LNC); leaf moisture content (LMC) and leaf nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio (LN/P); and leaf specific dry weight (LSW), leaf succulence degree (LSD), and leaf dry matter content (LDMC). Trade-offs were observed between SLA and LSW, LSD, and LDMC; between leaf phosphorus content (LPC) and LN/P; and between LMC, LSW, and LDMC. In the plant trait–environment relationships, soil nutrients (pH, soil total phosphorus content (STP), and soil ammonium nitrogen content (SAN)) and soil enzyme activities (cellulase (CB), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), enzyme C/N activity ratio, and enzyme N/P activity ratio) were identified as the primary drivers of variation in leaf functional traits. Interestingly, nitrogen deficiency constrained the growth of vine plants in the mining area. Our study revealed that the responses of leaf functional traits of different vines under different soil thicknesses have significant species specificity, and each vine shows different resource acquisition and conservation strategies. Furthermore, soil cover thickness primarily influences plant functional traits by directly affecting soil enzyme activities and nutrients. However, the pathways through which soil thickness impacts these traits differ among various functional traits. Our findings provide a theoretical basis and practical reference for selecting vine plants and optimizing soil cover techniques for ecological restoration in mining areas.