Introduction: Management of COVID‐19 in kidney transplant recipients should include treatment of the infection, regulation of immunosuppression, and supportive therapy. However, there is no consensus on this issue yet. This study aimed to our experiences with kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID‐19.Material and Methods: Kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID‐19 from five major transplant centers in Istanbul, Turkey, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified as having moderate or severe pneumonia for the analysis. The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury, the average length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mechanical ventilation.Results: Forty patients were reviewed retrospectively over a follow‐up period of 32 days after being diagnosed with COVID‐19. Cough, fever, and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms in all patients. The frequency of previous induction and rejection therapy was significantly higher in the group with severe pneumonia compared to the moderate pneumonia group. None of the patients using cyclosporine A developed severe pneumonia. Five patients died during follow‐up in the intensive care unit. None of the patients developed graft loss during follow‐up.Discussion: COVID‐19 has been seen to more commonly cause moderate or severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppression should be carefully reduced in these patients. Induction therapy with lymphocyte‐depleting agents should be carefully avoided in kidney transplant recipients during the pandemic period.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of complications from COVID-19. However, data on the risk of allograft damage or death in kidney transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19 is limited. In addition, the first and second waves of the pandemic occurred at different times all over the world. In Turkey, the Health Minister confirmed the first case in March 2020; after that, the first wave occurred between March and August 2020; afterward, the second wave began in September 2020. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical presentations of kidney transplant recipients in the first two waves of the pandemic in Turkey and explore the impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes after the initial episode. Methods: Patients with COVID-19 from seven centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Initially, four hundred and eighty-eight kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 were enrolled. The endpoints were the occurrence of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, longer-term outcomes such as mortality, need for dialysis, and allograft function of the surviving patients was analyzed. Results: Four hundred seventy-five patients were followed up for a median of 132 days after COVID-19. Forty-seven patients (9.9%) died after a median length of hospitalization of 15 days. Although the mortality rate (10.1% vs. 9.8%) and intensive care unit admission (14.5% vs. 14.5%) were similar in the first two waves, hospitalization (68.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (44.2% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.8% vs. 16%; p = 0.456), and cytokine storm rate (15.9% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.072) were higher in first wave compared to the second wave. These 47 patients died within the first month of COVID-19. Six (1.4%) of the surviving patients lost allografts during treatment. There was no difference in the median serum creatinine clearance of the surviving patients at baseline (52 mL/min [IQR, 47–66]), first- (56 mL/min [IQR, 51–68]), third- (51 mL/min [IQR,48–67]) and sixth-months (52 mL/min [IQR, 48–81]). Development of cytokine storm and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were independent predictors for mortality. Conclusions: Mortality remains a problem in COVID-19. All the deaths occur in the first month of COVID-19. Also, acute kidney injury is common in hospitalized patients, and some of the patients suffer from graft loss after the initial episode.

Background Each year, millions face natural disasters, encountering mass fatalities and severe medical issues such as crush injuries and crush syndrome. Crush syndrome, marked by acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia, correlates with mortality. This study focuses on presenting epidemiological data on kidney disease resulting from the February 6, 2023 earthquakes centered in Kahramanmaras. Methods This retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with crush syndrome after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes, treated in regional hospitals or referred elsewhere in Turkey. Patient data were documented using the web-based system developed by the Turkish Nephrology Association Renal Disaster Working Group. Results Of the 1024 analyzed patients from 46 centers, 515 (50.3%) were women. The mean age was 41 ± 16 years, with a median duration of 12 h under rubble, and the median presentation time to the first health facility was 4 h after extrication from the rubble. Upon admission, 79.8% received intravenous fluid therapy, all potassium-free. Initial serum creatinine, K⁺, and creatinine kinase levels averaged 2.59 ± 2 mg/dl, 5.1 ± 1 mmol/L 38,305 ± 54,303 U/L, respectively. Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were 53.6%, with mean hospital and ICU stays of 20 and 11 days, respectively. Compartment syndrome occurred in 40.8% of patients, with 75.8% undergoing fasciotomy. Acute kidney injury developed in 67.9% of patients, with 70.3% undergoing hemodialysis, totaling 3016 sessions on 488 patients. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 9.8%. Conclusion Earthquakes have a significant impact on kidney health. Although our study indicates some progress compared to previous earthquake responses, there remains a crucial need for drills emphasizing post-earthquake initial response, fluid-electrolyte balance management, and emergency dialysis protocols. Graphical abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of primary sarcopenia in older patients with normal nutrition and to assess the relationships between the primary sarcopenia with anthropometric measurements.Design and methods: In this prospective clinical cross-sectional study, six-hundred patients who applied to Polyclinic of Geriatrics between dates 2010 and 2011 have been evaluated. The 386 patients who were supposed to have potential secondary sarcopenia were excluded from the study. Age, gender, weight, height, BMI, calf and waist circumference, ongoing medications, additional diseases of the 214 patients included in the study have been surveyed. The sarcopenia criteria of EWSGOP have been applied. Results: Two hundred fourteen cases included in the study were composed of 148 female and 66 male subjects. Mean age was 71.8 ± 2.1 years. Sarcopenia was detected in 105 (49%) subjects while 109 (51%) were normal. Sixty-four female (61%) and 41 (39%) male subjects were sarcopenic. Normal group included 84 female (77%) and 25 male (23%) subjects. Incidence of sarcopenia was found higher in the female patients (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was detected between sarcopenic and normal groups with respect to age, height, weight, calf circumference and evaluation tests. Waist circumference was higher in the sarcopenic group than the normal group (p=0.02). When both groups were analyzed for BMI; 53 (51%) of the 105 sarcopenic patients had BMI over 30 kg/m2 while 29 (27%) and 23 (22%) patients had BMI of 25-30 kg/m2 and below 25 kg/m2, respectively. Incidence of sarcopenia was significantly higher in the group with BMI over 30 kg/m2 when compared with the groups with BMI of 25-30 kg/m2 and below 25 kg/m2 (p=0.01). Conclusion: Sarcopenia that makes older people physically dependent and decreases their quality of life that receive sufficient nutritional support and are also obese should be comprehensively investigated with respect to presence of sarcopenia.

ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) is a leading cause of pauci-immune crescentic GN. Recent evidence indicates that complement activation, marked by C3 deposition in glomeruli, may contribute to more severe renal injury and influence renal outcomes. We aim to evaluate the clinical, histopathological, and prognostic implications of C3 deposition in ANCA-GN. We retrospectively analyzed 195 patients with biopsy-proven ANCA-GN from the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases registry from 2002 to 2022. Patients were classified as C3-positive or C3-negative according to kidney biopsy immunofluorescence findings. Clinical characteristics, histopathologic lesion profiles, and follow-up outcomes (remission, relapse, and survival) were compared between the two groups. Of 195 patients, 54 (27.7%) had C3 deposition. The C3-negative group was more likely to exhibit PR3-ANCA positivity, whereas the C3-positive group was strongly associated with the presence of MPO-ANCAs (22.2% vs. 77.8%; p = 0.001). Compared with C3-negative patients, C3-positive patients had higher levels of proteinuria (2026 mg/day vs. 1790 mg/day; p = 0.049) and lower HDL levels (30 mg/dL vs. 37 mg/dL; p = 0.009). Fibrocellular crescents were more common in C3-positive patients than in C3-negative patients (p < 0.001). Immune complex deposits, including IgG (26.4% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), IgA (14.8% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001), IgM (25.0% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), and C1q (13.7% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the C3-positive group. However, no significant difference was detected in overall survival (85.8% for C3-negative patients vs. 88.9% for C3-positive patients; p = 0.249). Similarly, the remission (62.1% vs. 59.4%; p = 0.786) and relapse rates (14.8% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.532) did not differ between the groups. In ANCA-GN, glomerular C3 deposition is associated with an MPO-ANCA serotype, greater proteinuria, and more severe renal histology (including immune-complex deposition and more fibrocellular crescents), indicating more pronounced complement activation and tissue injury. However, C3 deposition did not predict worse patient or renal survival in our cohort. Not applicable.