Excess body weight constitutes one of the major health challenges for societies and healthcare systems worldwide. Besides the type of diet, calorie intake and the lack of physical exercise, recent data have highlighted a possible association between endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as bisphenol A, phthalates and their analogs, and obesity. EDCs represent a heterogeneous group of chemicals that may influence the hormonal regulation of body mass and adipose tissue morphology. Based on the available data from mechanistic, animal and epidemiological studies including meta-analyses, the weight of evidence points towards the contribution of EDCs to the development of obesity, associated disorders and obesity-related adipose tissue dysfunction by (1) impacting adipogenesis; (2) modulating epigenetic pathways during development, enhancing susceptibility to obesity; (3) influencing neuroendocrine signals responsible for appetite and satiety; (4) promoting a proinflammatory milieu in adipose tissue and inducing a state of chronic subclinical inflammation; (5) dysregulating gut microbiome and immune homeostasis; and (6) inducing dysfunction in thermogenic adipose tissue. Critical periods of exposure to obesogenic EDCs are the prenatal, neonatal, pubertal and reproductive periods. Interestingly, EDCs even at low doses may promote epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult obesity in subsequent generations. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the role of obesogenic EDCs, specifically BPA and phthalate plasticizers, in the development of obesity, taking into account in vitro, animal and epidemiologic studies; discuss mechanisms linking EDCs to obesity; analyze the effects of EDCs on obesity in critical chronic periods of exposure; and present interesting perspectives, challenges and preventive measures in this research area.

Aberrant circulating omentin-1, which is an anti-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic adipokine, has been reported in various solid tumors. Therefore, we investigated whether or not circulating omentin-1 could be associated with postmenopausal BC (PBC) and could be used as a potential diagnostic and clinical tool taking into consideration clinicopathologic features, tumor markers, as well as anthropometric, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters. Serum omentin-1, tumor markers (CA15-3 and CEA); metabolic (insulin, glucose, HOMA index, and serum lipids), anthropometric (BMI, waist circumference, and fat mass), and inflammatory (TNF-α, IL-6, hsCRP) parameters; classic adipokines (leptin and adiponectin); the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) score; and cardiovascular (CVD) risk were determined in 103 postmenopausal women with pathologically confirmed incident invasive BC, 103 controls matched on age, 51 patients with benign breast lesions (BBL), and 50 obese postmenopausal women of similar age. The mean serum omentin-1 was significantly lower in cases than in controls and patients with BBL (p < 0.001). In the patients, omentin-1 was inversely associated with tumor, metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers, cancer stage, and the number of infiltrated lymph nodes (p < 0.05). In all study participants, omentin-1 was negatively correlated with CVD risk and positively correlated with MedDiet score. Lower circulating omentin-1 was independently associated with PBC occurrence above and beyond known risk factors. According to the ROC curve analysis, the overall diagnostic performance of omentin-1 (0.84, 95% CI 0.79–0.89) is similar to CA15-3. Circulating omentin-1 may be a biomarker at the intersection of PBC and cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women, and could be modulated by the adoption of a MedDiet. Further mechanistic and large multicentric prospective and longitudinal studies are required to elucidate the ontological role of omentin-1 in BC and CVD risks, as well as its diagnostic and prognostic ability and its therapeutic potential.

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are foods that have undergone extensive industrial processing, with the addition of emulsifiers and sweeteners together with various chemicals originating during preparation and the packaging procedures. UPFs are intended to be more palpable, long lasting, and easier to find and consume. However, their widespread use has been linked to various disorders, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and lately metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Given that MASLD is primarily driven by excessive fat accumulation in the liver and considering the high energy density and poor nutritional quality of UPFs, a plausible link has emerged between elevated UPF intake and increased MASLD risk. The aim of this review is to synthesize current data regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MASLD, the role of UPF overconsumption in its development, and potential strategies to prevent disease progression towards metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Special focus is placed on the contribution of UPFs to these processes, highlighting the importance of minimizing their consumption as supported by contemporary research.

Irisin, a novel adipo-myokine with metabolic regulatory functions, exerts anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic actions that may confer protection against sepsis-induced organ injury in experimental studies. Until now, only one human study has explored circulating irisin at sepsis onset. We aimed to examine serum irisin and its kinetics in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock with regard to sepsis severity and outcome. We enrolled 102 critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock within 48 h of diagnosis and 102 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Irisin was determined in serum upon enrollment in all participants and one week later in patients using an immunoenzymatic method. The outcome of sepsis was recorded 28 days after enrollment. At enrollment, circulating irisin was significantly lower in patients than controls (22.3 ± 6.8 μg/L vs. 28.1 ± 6.7 μg/L, p < 0.001), and increased significantly one week later (22.3 ± 6.8 μg/L vs. 26.6 ± 9.5 μg/L, p < 0.001). Irisin was significantly lower in patients who presented with septic shock than those with sepsis, and in non-survivors than survivors both at enrollment and one week later. However, kinetics of irisin did not differ between the groups (p > 0.05). Patients with higher circulating irisin during the first week of sepsis had a better outcome (p < 0.001). Lower irisin was independently associated with 28-day mortality (sepsis onset: HR 0.44, 95% C.I. 0.26–0.77, p = 0.004 and one week after: HR 0.37, 95% C.I. 0.23–0.58, p < 0.001). Irisin was negatively correlated with severity scores, metabolic, and inflammatory biomarkers. Circulating irisin decreases early in sepsis and is an independent predictor of 28-day mortality. Irisin may be a promising diagnostic and prognostic sepsis biomarker; nevertheless, larger studies are needed to explore its role in sepsis.