With increasing global climate change, extreme weather threats to indoor environments are growing. Heatwave events provide essential data for building thermal resilience analysis. However, existing heatwave definition indicators vary widely and lack standardized criteria. To more accurately evaluate indoor overheating risks, this study compared indoor overheating responses under different heatwave definition indicators, considering the temporal disconnect between indoor and outdoor heat conditions. Focusing on Beijing, this study established an indoor–outdoor coupled heatwave evaluation framework using 1951–2021 meteorological data and the heat index as an overheating metric. By analyzing indoor overheating degree and overlap degree to characterize indoor–outdoor correlations, we concluded that different definitions of heatwaves lead to variations in identifications, while multidimensional indicators better capture extreme events. Heatwaves with prolonged duration and high intensity pose greater health risks. Although Beijing’s indoor thermal conditions are generally safe, peak heat indices during summer heatwaves exceed danger thresholds in some buildings, highlighting thermal safety concerns. The metrics for heatwave 6 and heatwave 7 optimally integrate indoor–outdoor characteristics with higher thresholds identifying more extreme events. These findings support the design of building thermal resilience, overheating early warnings, and climate-adaptive electrification strategies.