Lei Su

Dr. Lei Su


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLei Su
Lei Su
LTLiang Tang
Liang Tang
XLXianzhang Ling
Xianzhang Ling
CLChunhui Liu
Chunhui Liu
XZXiaoyu Zhang
Xiaoyu Zhang

1 November 2018 in Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLei Su
Lei Su
Huaping WanHuaping Wan
Huaping Wan
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li
XLXian-Zhang Ling
Xian-Zhang Ling
Extensive damage to offshore and port structures supported on piles behind a quay wall has been frequently reported as a result of soil liquefaction and lateral spreading in earthquakes. This study aims to explore the dynamic behavior of a soil-pile-quay wall (SPQW) system subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in terms of experimental investigation, numerical simulation, and global sensitivity analysis (GSA). A large-scale (1g ) shake-table experiment on a SPQW system is presented in detail, including sensor arrangement, model configuration, and experimental results. Typical liquefaction phenomena, such as sand boils and ground settlement, were observed during the test. The shake-table experiment results were used to validate a three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear finite-element (FE) model developed for dynamic analysis of a fully coupled soil-water system. This FE model accounts for the interactions of the soil, pile, and quay wall through explicitly modeling them as an integrated system. Based on the validated FE model, a GSA was performed to further investigate how variations in system properties influence the dynamic responses of the SPQW system. The GSA with high computational efficiency was implemented using the polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) surrogate model, and the GSA results indicate the relative importance of modeling parameters, which provides insightful information about the system behavior. The presented work provides useful guidance on experimental and numerical simulations of typical SPQW system.

16 July 2024 in Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiaoyu Zhang
Xiaoyu Zhang
YPYingyi Pan
Yingyi Pan
LSLei Su
Lei Su
EOEntong Ou
Entong Ou
HLHai Liu
Hai Liu
JCJie Cui
Jie Cui

1 June 2021 in Journal of Bridge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HWHua-Ping Wan
Hua-Ping Wan
LSLei Su
Lei Su
DFDan M. Frangopol
Dan M. Frangopol
ZCZhiwang Chang
Zhiwang Chang
WRWei-Xin Ren
Wei-Xin Ren
XLXianzhang Ling
Xianzhang Ling
Previous seismic events have shown that bridges are more susceptible to severe damage when subjected to near-fault ground motions. Near-fault ground motions usually possess obvious pulse-like features in their velocity time histories. The velocity pulses are further distinguished by either a distinct acceleration pulse (acceleration-pulse) or a succession of high-frequency one-sided acceleration spikes (non-acceleration-pulse). The acceleration-pulse ground motions will probably cause more damage to structures compared with non-acceleration-pulse ground motions. This study will focus on assessing the effects of acceleration-pulse ground motions on the seismic response of a pile-supported bridge at a canyon site. A refined three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) model will be developed for the nonlinear time history response analysis of this ground–bridge system, in which enhanced modeling of free field boundary and soil–pile interactions will be considered. To investigate the seismic response of the ground–bridge system, six pairs of acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions will be used, and each pair has the same peak ground acceleration (PGA). The seismic response of this ground–bridge system will be subjected to acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions and will be fully evaluated considering two aspects. First, the seismic time history responses of the ground–bridge system will be assessed under a single representative acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions. Second, the mean of the maximum seismic response of the ground–bridge system under multiple acceleration-pulse and non-acceleration-pulse ground motions will be explored. The results from this study show that compared with the non-acceleration-pulse ground motions, the acceleration-pulse ground motions had a more significant impact on the seismic response of the ground–bridge system. Therefore, special care should be taken on the acceleration-pulse effect of ground motion, because bridge structures are more vulnerable to damage when subjected to acceleration-pulse ground motions.

1 August 2021 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YWYonghong Wang
Yonghong Wang
SSSongkui Sang
Songkui Sang
MZMingyi Zhang
Mingyi Zhang
XBXiaoyu Bai
Xiaoyu Bai
LSLei Su
Lei Su

19 February 2023 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZQZhijian Qiu
Zhijian Qiu
ZYZhiquan Yu
Zhiquan Yu
LSLei Su
Lei Su
APAthul Prabhakaran
Athul Prabhakaran
AEAhmed Elgamal
Ahmed Elgamal
XWXiang Wang
Xiang Wang