We sought to determine the effects of the use of a Bioengineered Combo Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent (Combo^® DTS) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) by evaluating clinical outcomes and by performing an optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis. We retrospectively analyzed data from 39 patients who had successfully undergone OCT-guided revascularization of a CTO being treated with a Combo^® DTS. Clinical assessment, angiography (with quantitative coronary angiography analysis) and OCT examination were performed at baseline and at follow-up. The median follow-up period was 189 days, ranging from 157 to 615 days. At follow-up, revascularization was required due to angiographic restenosis in 40% (14 of 35) of patients. OCT analysis detected neointima proliferation in 23 (76.6%) patients. Neointima formation was often associated with microvessels in 18 patients (60%). Neoatheroslcerosis was observed in 2 (6.6%) patients. Malapposition was found in 4 patients (13.3%), and stent fractures were found in 11 patients (36.6%). Rate of strut coverage was 96.3% at follow-up. In conclusion, the implantation of a Combo^® DTS after successful CTO recanalization was associated with a restenosis rate of 40% despite good stent implantation at baseline, proven by OCT. Neointima formation was found as a main contributor to restenosis. Nevertheless, we observed a low rate of major cardiovascular events in our follow-up.

(1) Background: Vascular mural cells reside in the media and outer layers of the vessel wall. Their ability to proliferate and migrate or to change phenotype in response to external cues is a central feature of the vascular response to injury. Genetically engineered mice are used for loss- or gain-of-function analyses or lineage tracing in vivo, their primary cells for mechanistic studies in vitro. Whether and how cultivation conditions affect their phenotype and function is often overlooked. (2) Methods: Here, we systematically studied how the cultivation of primary mural cells isolated from the aorta of adult wild-type mice in either basal medium (DMEM) or special media formulated for the cultivation of fibroblasts or pericytes affects their phenotype and function. (3) Results: Medium composition did not alter cell viability, but the mRNA levels of differentiated smooth muscle cell markers were highest in vascular mural cells expanded in DMEM. Conversely, significantly higher numbers of proliferating and migrating cells were observed in cells expanded in Pericyte medium, and cytoskeletal rearrangements supported increased migratory capacities. Significantly reduced telomere lengths and metabolic reprogramming was observed in aortic mural cells cultured in Fibroblast medium. (4) Conclusions: Our findings underline the plasticity of primary aortic mural cells and highlight the importance of the culture media composition during their expansion, which could be exploited to interrogate their responsiveness to external stimuli or conditions observed in vivo or in patients.

Background—Several methods to reduce radiation exposure in the setting of coronary procedures are available on the market, and we previously showed that additional radiation shields reduce operator exposure during radial interventions. We set out to examine the efficacy of real-time personal dosimetry monitoring in a real-world setting of radial artery catheterization. Methods and Results—In an all-comer prospective, parallel study, consecutive coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures were performed with the use of standard radiation shield alone (control group) or with the addition of a real-time dosimetry monitoring system (Raysafe, Billdal, Sweden, monitoring group). The primary outcome was the difference in exposure of the primary operator among groups. Additional endpoints included patient, nurse, second operator exposure and fluoroscopy time. A total of 700 procedures were included in the analysis (n = 369 in the monitoring group). There were no differences among groups in patients’ body mass index (p = 0.232), type of procedure (intervention vs. diagnostic, p = 0.172), and patient sex (p = 0.784). Fluoroscopy time was shorter in the monitoring group (5.6 (5.1–6.2) min vs. 7.0 (6.1–7.7) min, p = 0.023). Radiation exposure was significantly lower in the monitoring group for the patient (135 (115–151) µSv vs. 208 (176–245) µSv, p < 0.0001) but not for the first operator (9 (7–11) µSv vs. 10 (8–11), p = 0.70) and the assistant (2 (1–2) µSv vs. 2 (1–2) µSv, p = 0.121). Conclusions—In clinical daily practice, the use of a real-time dosimetry monitoring device reduces patient radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time without an effect on operator radiation exposure.