Jinglin Mo

Mr. Jinglin Mo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2026 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CZChenyi Zhu
Chenyi Zhu
XLXiaoxi Lyu
Xiaoxi Lyu
DWDongnan Wang
Dongnan Wang
JMJinglin Mo
Jinglin Mo
YHYunyu Huang
Yunyu Huang
MMMingyue Ma
Mingyue Ma
Karst critical zones in Southwest China are highly vulnerable to soil–water loss because thin soils, exposed carbonate bedrock, well-developed epikarst, and strong surface–subsurface connectivity promote both surface erosion and subsurface leakage. Although soil erosion, subsurface leakage, karst rocky desertification, and ecological restoration have been widely studied, the coupling between landscape structural patterns and soil–water loss remains insufficiently synthesized. This semi-systematic critical review synthesizes evidence from karst hydrology, soil erosion, karst rocky desertification, landscape structure, and critical zone studies, with a primary focus on Southwest China. The reviewed evidence indicates that geomorphic setting, land use vegetation structure, bare-rock exposure, and epikarst development jointly regulate runoff generation, infiltration, sediment detachment, subsurface leakage, and sediment connectivity. Peak–cluster depressions commonly favor internal sediment storage and vertical leakage, whereas valley and canyon systems tend to enhance surface runoff connectivity and channelized sediment export. However, pathway dominance varies with rainfall intensity, soil moisture, soil thickness, land use, karst rocky desertification degree, and fracture–conduit connectivity. Long-term soil–water loss may further reshape landscape structure through soil thinning, vegetation degradation, bedrock exposure, and karst rocky desertification feedbacks. Current research is limited by insufficient quantification of subsurface soil loss, weak integration between landscape metrics and hydrological models, and scarce long-term monitoring data. Future studies should integrate field monitoring, tracers, remote sensing, landscape metrics, and coupled surface–subsurface models to support geomorphic-setting-specific karst rocky desertification control.

14 May 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJinglin Mo
Jinglin Mo
XLXiaoxi Lyu
Xiaoxi Lyu
SJShulin Jiao
Shulin Jiao
CZChenyi Zhu
Chenyi Zhu
DWDongnan Wang
Dongnan Wang
This study investigated spring water in the core area and buffer zone of the Shibing Dolomite Karst World Heritage Site using one-year monthly monitoring, hydrochemistry, nitrate dual isotopes, and the MixSIAR model. The buffer zone spring exhibits shallow fissure-conduit flow with rapid hydrological response, anthropogenic nitrate dominance (>62%), nitrification as the main process, and limited denitrification. Its nitrate concentration shows seasonal peaks. In contrast, the core area spring is recharged by deep fissure water, with natural nitrate sources (>80%), stable nitrate levels (5–7.4 mg/L), and potential local denitrification. Nitrogen export in the buffer zone increases 4.5 times in the rainy season (NO3− accounting for 93% of TN). The core area shows higher TN export flux per unit area (3.34 vs. 0.4 g/m2/a) and greater DON proportion. Nitrogen export far exceeds that from rocky desertified areas, suggesting that dissolved nitrogen leaching drives karst rocky desertification evolution.