Background: Seroma formation is a common postoperative complication. Fibrin-based glues are typically employed in an attempt to seal the cavity. Recently, the first nanoparticle (NP)-based treatment approaches have emerged. Nanoparticle dispersions can be used as tissue glues, capitalizing on a phenomenon known as ‘nanobridging’. In this process, macromolecules such as proteins physically adsorb onto the NP surface, leading to macroscopic adhesion. Although significant early seroma reduction has been shown, little is known about long-term efficacy of NPs. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effects of NPs in reducing seroma formation, and to understand their underlying mechanism.Methods: Seroma was surgically induced bilaterally in 20 Lewis rats. On postoperative day (POD) 7, seromas were aspirated on both sides. In 10 rats, one side was treated with NPs, while the contralateral side received only NP carrier solution. In the other 10 rats, one side was treated with fibrin glue, while the other was left untreated. Seroma fluid, blood and tissue samples were obtained at defined time points. Biochemical, histopathological and immunohistochemical assessments were made.Results: NP-treated sides showed no macroscopically visible seroma formation after application on POD 7, in stark contrast to the fibrin-treated sides, where 60% of the rats had seromas on POD 14, and 50% on POD 21. At the endpoint (POD 42), sides treated with nanoparticles (NPs) exhibited significant macroscopic differences compared to other groups, including the absence of a cavity, and increased fibrous adhesions. Histologically, there were more macrophage groupings and collagen type 1 (COL1) deposits in the superficial capsule on NP-treated sides.Conclusion: NPs not only significantly reduced early manifestations of seroma and demonstrated an anti-inflammatory response, but they also led to increased adhesion formation over the long term, suggesting a decreased risk of seroma recurrence. These findings highlight both the adhesive properties of NPs and their potential for clinical therapy.

AI, especially ChatGPT, is impacting healthcare through applications in research, patient communication, and training. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine ChatGPT-4’s ability to analyze images of lower leg defects and assesses its understanding of complex case reports in comparison to the performance of board-certified surgeons and residents. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria, where 52 participants reviewed images depicting lower leg defects within fictitious patient profiles and selected the optimal reconstruction techniques. The questionnaire included cases with varied difficulty, and answer options did not always include the most obvious choices. Findings highlight that ChatGPT-4 successfully evaluated various reconstruction methods but struggled to determine the optimal solution based on the available information in visual and written forms. A chi-squared test of independence was performed to investigate the overall association between answer options (A, B, C, and D) and rater group (board-certified surgeons, ChatGPT-4, and resident). Inter-group rater associations showed significant overall test results (p < 0.001), with high agreement among board-certified surgeons. Our results suggest that board-certified plastic surgeons remain essential for patient-specific treatment planning, while AI can support decision-making. This reaffirms the role of AI as a supportive tool, rather than a replacement, in reconstructive surgery.

Background: The traditional management of acute burn wounds using eschar debridement followed by split-thickness skin grafting has notable drawbacks. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), derived from autologous adipose tissue, promotes epithelialization and angiogenesis, while platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), obtained via centrifugation of patient blood, enhances wound healing. This study retrospectively analyzes the outcomes of patients with thermal injuries treated with a combination of topical SVF and PRF at the University Hospital Zurich Burn Center. Methods: From 2018 to 2020, 13 patients with deep partial-thickness burns (DPTBs) or mixed-pattern burns (MPBs) received combined topical SVF and PRF treatment. Eschar removal was performed enzymatically or surgically following hydrotherapy. SVF was collected via liposuction, and PRF from centrifuged blood. Healing progress, additional surgeries, and scar outcomes (assessed by the Manchester Scar Scale, MSS) were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The mean total body surface area burned was 29.6%, with 6.3% treated using SVF and PRF. Five patients required further surgical intervention for residual defects. Complete healing occurred within 20 days in patients without residual defects and within 51 days in those with defects. Higher MSS scores were observed in patients requiring additional surgery. No adverse effects were noted. Conclusions: Topical SVF and PRF offer a potentially less-invasive treatment for MPB and DPTB. However, due to frequent residual defects and regulatory concerns around SVF use, this approach cannot yet be considered a standard treatment.

The distance between the mid-clavicle and nipple (MCN) is crucial in planning reduction mammoplasties. MCN has been shown to be superior in achieving nipple-areola complex symmetry. However, there is great variability in clavicle anatomy. Detecting clavicle asymmetries is crucial for achieving optimal postoperative breast symmetry. This study assessed clavicle asymmetries in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasties and used correlation analyses to understand the outcome measures, including variations in resection weight and clavicle angles. We included 100 patients who underwent reduction mammoplasties with wise-pattern skin resections. Clavicle height asymmetries were identified through preoperative anthropometric measurements. Clavicle angles were assessed from pre- and postoperative images to differentiate between fixed and dynamic asymmetries. Statistical analyses used frequency distributions, generalized linear models, and logistic regression. Clavicle height differences were identified in 78% of the patients using preoperative anthropometric measurements. Pre- and postoperative images revealed fixed clavicle angle differences in 45% of the cases and dynamic differences in 16%. Dynamic clavicle height asymmetries were significantly associated with differences in resection weight between the breasts (p = 0.012), smaller differences in clavicle angles (p = 0.006), and patients aged 40 to 64 years (p = 0.038). Fixed asymmetries correlated with larger differences in clavicle angles (p = 0.023). Clavicle height asymmetry is common in reduction mammoplasty patients. Differentiating dynamics from fixed asymmetries preoperatively is important, as this study demonstrates significant correlations with resection weight, clavicle angles, and age. These findings suggest that compensatory clavicular asymmetries play a significant role in cases of pre-existing breast asymmetry, affecting surgical planning.