Epigenetic modifications are heritable, reversible alterations that causally reshape chromatin architecture and thereby influence DNA repair without changing nucleotide sequence. DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs profoundly influence DNA repair mechanisms and genomic stability. Aberrant epigenetic patterns in cancer compromise DNA damage recognition and repair, therefore impairing homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and base excision repair (BER) by suppressing key repair genes and lowering access to repair sites. Then it is dissected how loss-of-function mutations in Switch/Sucrose non-fermentable, imitation switch and CHD (Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding) chromatin-remodeling complexes impair nucleosome repositioning, preventing effective damage sensing and assembly of repair machinery. Non-coding RNAs contribute to epigenetic silencing at DNA break sites, exacerbating repair deficiencies. This review evaluates recent advances concerning epigenetic dysfunction and DNA repair impairment. It is also highlighted that nanoparticle-mediated delivery strategies are designed to overcome pharmacologic resistance. It is presented how epigenetic dysregulation of DNA repair can guide more effective and drug-resistant cancer therapies.

Endometriosis and endometrial cancer are distinct gynecological conditions that share overlapping biological mechanisms with implications for clinical management. Endometriosis is a chronic, benign disorder characterized by the ectopic implantation of functional tissue lining the uterus, primarily affecting women of reproductive age. It commonly causes chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The disease is marked by persistent inflammation, hormonal dysregulation, and alterations in cellular signaling, which mirror some neoplastic processes despite lacking malignant potential. Endometrial cancer is a malignant tumor of the uterine lining, most frequently diagnosed in postmenopausal women. Its incidence is rising due to aging, obesity, and prolonged estrogen exposure. Epidemiological studies suggest a modest increase in endometrial cancer risk among women with endometriosis. However, detection bias and metabolic confounders may influence this association. Both conditions share estrogen dependence, chronic inflammatory microenvironments, and dysregulated pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Somatic mutations in genes, including PTEN and ARID1A, further underline molecular intersections. Clinical management is tailored to disease type and severity. Endometriosis therapy emphasizes stepwise hormonal treatment, multidisciplinary pain management, and surgery when indicated. Endometrial cancer management relies on staging, with particular emphasis on molecular classification and histopathology to guide surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and immunotherapy in advanced cases. Emerging noninvasive biomarkers and precision medicine strategies may enhance diagnosis, monitoring, and targeted treatment in both conditions. Understanding their shared and divergent mechanisms aids risk stratification, individualized therapy, and improved quality of life. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize patient-specific management and translate mechanistic insights into clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains a major global health burden, with outcomes strongly dependent on stage at diagnosis. Although the oral cavity is directly accessible to clinical examination, many cases are still detected at advanced stages. This narrative review aimed to summarize current trends in OSCC diagnosis and early monitoring, with emphasis on non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques and biomarkers. Methods: A semi-systematic narrative literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined combinations of OSCC-, early-detection-, imaging-, cytology-, liquid-biopsy-, salivaomics-, artificial-intelligence-, and biosensor-related terms. English-language systematic reviews, meta-analyses, reviews of reviews, translational studies, and clinically relevant original articles were prioritized, with explicit attention to oral cavity-specific evidence and clearly identified extrapolation from broader head-and-neck or oropharyngeal cancer settings. Results: Conventional oral examination and histopathological assessment of biopsy specimens remain the diagnostic foundation. Adjunctive methods may support lesion triage, biopsy-site selection, risk stratification, and early monitoring, but cannot replace tissue diagnosis. Narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and molecular brush cytology appear particularly promising for specialist assessment and surveillance. Liquid biopsy and saliva-based biomarker platforms offer translational potential, particularly for repeatable monitoring, but clinical implementation is limited by methodological heterogeneity, pre-analytical variability, inconsistent thresholds, and insufficient external validation. Artificial intelligence and biosensor platforms remain promising but largely developmental. Conclusions: Progress in early OSCC diagnosis and monitoring will most likely depend on integrated diagnostic models combining clinical examination, adjunctive imaging, minimally invasive sampling, molecular biomarkers, and computational decision-support tools, validated in prospective multicenter studies.

Review of the Effects of Anesthetic Techniques and Medications on the Immune Response During the Perioperative Period - Article abstract #951077

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a recurrent but context-dependent feature of neurodegenerative disease, and its position in the pathogenic cascade differs fundamentally between disorders. This narrative review argues that this heterogeneity, rather than mitochondrial biology itself, determines therapeutic tractability. We synthesize evidence on mitochondrial regulation of neuronal development, organelle quality control, redox signaling and neuroinflammation; on oxidative biomarkers, whose clinical use remains constrained by limited disease specificity, methodological heterogeneity and insufficient longitudinal validation; and on therapeutic strategies ranging from antioxidants and NAD+ augmentation to mitochondrial genome engineering, targeted delivery and organelle transfer. A consistent pattern emerges across these domains: broadly acting interventions have repeatedly failed in sporadic disease, whereas the strongest translational signals arise where mitochondrial dysfunction is genetically anchored and pathway-proximal. Mitochondrial modulation is therefore unlikely to provide a universal disease-modifying strategy, but remains a useful, carefully targeted addition for patient groups identified by genetic or specific biological markers.