Nadia Rucci

Dr. Nadia Rucci

Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMattia Capulli
Mattia Capulli
RPRiccardo Paone
Riccardo Paone
Nadia RucciNadia Rucci
Nadia Rucci

30 October 2006 in Arthritis & Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFabrizio De Benedetti
Fabrizio De Benedetti
Nadia RucciNadia Rucci
Nadia Rucci
ANDREA DEL FATTOREANDREA DEL FATTORE
ANDREA DEL FATTORE
BPBarbara Peruzzi
Barbara Peruzzi
RPRita Paro
Rita Paro
Anna Maria TetiAnna Maria Teti
Anna Maria Teti

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco PonzettiMarco Ponzetti
Marco Ponzetti
Nadia RucciNadia Rucci
Nadia Rucci
Osteoblasts, the cells that build up our skeleton, are remarkably versatile and important cells that need tight regulation in all the phases of their differentiation to guarantee proper skeletal development and homeostasis. Although we know many of the key pathways involved in osteoblast differentiation and signaling, it is becoming clearer and clearer that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and we are constantly discovering novel concepts in osteoblast physiology. In this review, we discuss well-established pathways of osteoblastic differentiation, i.e., the classical ones committing mesenchymal stromal cells to osteoblast, and then osteocytes as well as recently emerged players. In particular, we discuss micro (mi)RNAs, long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, circular (circ)RNAs, and extracellular vesicles, focusing on the mechanisms through which osteoblasts are regulated by these factors, and conversely, how they use extracellular vesicles to communicate with the surrounding microenvironment.

18 April 2019 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco PonzettiMarco Ponzetti
Marco Ponzetti
Nadia RucciNadia Rucci
Nadia Rucci
The term osteoimmunology was coined many years ago to describe the research field that deals with the cross-regulation between bone cells and the immune system. As a matter of fact, many factors that are classically considered immune-related, such as InterLeukins (i.e., IL-6, -11, -17, and -23), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, Receptor-Activator of Nuclear factor Kappa B (RANK), and its Ligand (RANKL), Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cell, cytoplasmatic-1 (NFATc1), and others have all been found to be crucial in osteoclast and osteoblast biology. Conversely, bone cells, which we used to think would only regulate each other and take care of remodeling bone, actually regulate immune cells, by creating the so-called “endosteal niche.” Both osteoblasts and osteoclasts participate to this niche, either by favoring engraftment, or mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSCs). In this review, we will describe the main milestones at the base of the osteoimmunology and present the key cellular players of the bone-immune system cross-talk, including HSCs, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, bone marrow macrophages, osteomacs, T- and B-lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and neutrophils. We will also briefly describe some pathological conditions in which the bone-immune system cross-talk plays a crucial role, with the final aim to portray the state of the art in the mechanisms regulating the bone-immune system interplay, and some of the latest molecular players in the field. This is important to encourage investigation in this field, to identify new targets in the treatment of bone and immune diseases.

1 October 2004 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAntonella Tacconelli
Antonella Tacconelli
AFAntonietta Rosella Farina
Antonietta Rosella Farina
LCLucia Annamaria Cappabianca
Lucia Annamaria Cappabianca
GDGiuseppina DeSantis
Giuseppina DeSantis
ATAlessandra Tessitore
Alessandra Tessitore
AMAndrew Mackay
Andrew Mackay

23 August 2005 in Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ANDREA DEL FATTOREANDREA DEL FATTORE
ANDREA DEL FATTORE
BPBarbara Peruzzi
Barbara Peruzzi
Nadia RucciNadia Rucci
Nadia Rucci
IRI Recchia
I Recchia
ACAlfredo Cappariello
Alfredo Cappariello
Anna Maria TetiAnna Maria Teti
Anna Maria Teti
Background: Osteopetrosis, a genetic disease characterised by osteoclast failure, is classified into three forms: infantile malignant autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO), intermediate autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (IRO), and autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (ADO). Methods: We studied 49 patients, 21 with ARO, one with IRO, and 27 with type II ADO (ADO II). Results: Most ARO patients bore known or novel (one case) ATP6i (TCIRG1) gene mutations. Six ADO II patients had no mutations in ClCN7, the only so far recognised gene implicated, suggesting involvement of yet unknown genes. Identical ClCN7 mutations produced differing phenotypes with variable degrees of severity. In ADO II, serum tartrate resistant acid phosphatase was always elevated. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) was generally low, but osteocalcin was high, suggesting perturbed osteoblast differentiation or function. In contrast, BALP was high in ARO patients. Elevated osteoclast surface/bone surface was noted in biopsies from most ARO patients. Cases with high osteoclasts also showed increased osteoblast surface/bone surface. ARO osteoclasts were morphologically normal, with unaltered formation rates, intracellular pH handling, and response to acidification. Their resorption activity was greatly reduced, but not abolished. In control osteoclasts, all resorption activity was abolished by combined inhibition of proton pumping and sodium/proton antiport. Conclusions: These findings provide a rationale for novel therapies targeting pH handling mechanisms in osteoclasts and their microenvironment.