Fluidized solidified soil (FSS) has emerged as a promising material for marine pile scour remediation, yet its limited construction window and vulnerability to hydraulic erosion before sufficient curing constrain its broader application. This study systematically evaluates FSS formulations based on dredged sediment, cement partially replaced by silica fume (i.e., 0%, 4%, 8%, and 12%), and quicklime activation under three water–solid ratios (WSR, i.e., 0.525, 0.55, and 0.575). Experimental assessments included flowability tests, unconfined compressive strength, direct shear tests, and microstructural analysis via XRD and SEM. The results indicate that SF substitution significantly mitigates flowability loss during the 90–120 min interval, thereby extending the operational period. Moreover, the greatest enhancement in mechanical performance was achieved at an 8% SF replacement: at WSR = 0.55, the 3-day UCS increased by 22.78%, while the 7-day cohesion and internal friction angle rose by 13.97% and 2.59%, respectively. Microscopic analyses also confirmed that SF’s pozzolanic reaction generated additional C-S-H gel. However, the SF substitution exhibits a pronounced threshold effect, with levels above 8% introducing unreacted particles that disrupt the cementitious network. These results underscore the critical balance between flowability and early-age strength for stable marine pile scour repair, with WSR = 0.525 and 8% SF substitution identified as the optimal mix.