Isabella Palumbo

Prof. Dr. Isabella Palumbo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco BianconiFrancesco Bianconi
Francesco Bianconi
IPIsabella Palumbo
Isabella Palumbo
ASAngela Spanu
Angela Spanu
Susanna Maria Francesca NuvoliSusanna Maria Francesca Nuvoli
Susanna Maria Francesca Nuvoli
MFMario luca Fravolini
Mario luca Fravolini
BPBarbara Palumbo
Barbara Palumbo
Quantitative extraction of imaging features from medical scans (‘radiomics’) has attracted a lot of research attention in the last few years. The literature has consistently emphasized the potential use of radiomics for computer-assisted diagnosis, as well as for predicting survival and response to treatment. Radiomics is appealing in that it enables full-field analysis of the lesion, provides nearly real-time results, and is non-invasive. Still, a lot of studies suffer from a series of drawbacks such as lack of standardization and repeatability. Such limitations, along with the unmet demand for large enough image datasets for training the algorithms, are major hurdles that still limit the application of radiomics on a large scale. In this paper, we review the current developments, potential applications, limitations, and perspectives of PET/CT radiomics with specific focus on the management of patients with lung cancer.

1 February 2016 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IPIsabella Palumbo
Isabella Palumbo
BPB. Palumbo
B. Palumbo
MFM.L. Fravolini
M.L. Fravolini
MMM. Marcantonini
M. Marcantonini
EPE. Perrucci
E. Perrucci
CAC. Aristei
C. Aristei

15 September 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBarbara Palumbo
Barbara Palumbo
Francesco BianconiFrancesco Bianconi
Francesco Bianconi
IPIsabella Palumbo
Isabella Palumbo
MFMario luca Fravolini
Mario luca Fravolini
MMMatteo Minestrini
Matteo Minestrini
ASAngela Spanu
Angela Spanu
In this paper, we investigate the role of shape and texture features from 18F-FDG PET/CT to discriminate between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. To this end, we retrospectively evaluated cross-sectional data from 111 patients (64 males, 47 females, age = 67.5 ± 11.0) all with histologically confirmed benign (n=39) or malignant (n=72) solitary pulmonary nodules. Eighteen three-dimensional imaging features, including conventional, texture, and shape features from PET and CT were tested for significant differences (Wilcoxon-Mann-Withney) between the benign and malignant groups. Prediction models based on different feature sets and three classification strategies (Classification Tree, k-Nearest Neighbours, and Naïve Bayes) were also evaluated to assess the potential benefit of shape and texture features compared with conventional imaging features alone. Eight features from CT and 15 from PET were significantly different between the benign and malignant groups. Adding shape and texture features increased the performance of both the CT-based and PET-based prediction models with overall accuracy gain being 3.4–11.2 pp and 2.2–10.2 pp, respectively. In conclusion, we found that shape and texture features from 18F-FDG PET/CT can lead to a better discrimination between benign and malignant lung nodules by increasing the accuracy of the prediction models by an appreciable margin.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBarbara Palumbo
Barbara Palumbo
TBTommaso Buresta
Tommaso Buresta
Susanna Maria Francesca NuvoliSusanna Maria Francesca Nuvoli
Susanna Maria Francesca Nuvoli
ASAngela Spanu
Angela Spanu
OSOrazio Schillaci
Orazio Schillaci
IPIsabella Palumbo
Isabella Palumbo
Nuclear medicine techniques (single photon emission computerized tomography, SPECT, and positron emission tomography, PET) represent molecular imaging tools, able to provide in vivo biomarkers of different diseases. To investigate brain tumours and metastases many different radiopharmaceuticals imaged by SPECT and PET can be used. In this review the main and most promising radiopharmaceuticals available to detect brain metastases are reported. Furthermore the diagnostic contribution of the combination of SPECT and PET data with radiological findings (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) is discussed.

8 July 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luca FilippiLuca Filippi
Luca Filippi
IPIsabella Palumbo
Isabella Palumbo
OBOreste Bagni
Oreste Bagni
OSOrazio Schillaci
Orazio Schillaci
CACynthia Aristei
Cynthia Aristei
BPBarbara Palumbo
Barbara Palumbo
The aims of the present systematic review are to: (1) assess the diagnostic performance of somatostatin receptor (SSR)targeted positron emission tomography (PET) with different tracers and devices in patients affected by meningiomas; and (2) to evaluate the theranostic applications of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in meningiomas. A systematic literature search according to PRISMA criteria was made by using two main databases. Only studies published from 2011 up to March 2022 in the English language with ≥10 enrolled patients were selected. Following our research strategy, 17 studies were included for the assessment. Fourteen studies encompassed 534 patients, harboring 733 meningiomas, submitted to SSR-targeted PET/CT (n = 10) or PET/MRI (n = 4) for de novo diagnosis, recurrence detection, or radiation therapy (RT) planning (endpoint 1), while 3 studies included 69 patients with therapy-refractory meningiomas submitted to PRRT (endpoint 2). A relevant variation in methodology was registered among diagnostic studies, since only a minority of them reported histopathology as a reference standard. PET, especially when performed through PET/MRI, resulted particularly useful for the detection of meningiomas located in the skull base (SB) or next to the falx cerebri, significantly influencing RT planning. As far as it concerns PRRT studies, stable disease was obtained in the 66.6% of the treated patients, being grade 1–2 hematological toxicity the most common side effect. Of note, the wide range of the administered activities, the various utilized radiopharmaceuticals (90Y-DOTATOC and/or 177Lu-DOTATATE), the lack of dosimetric studies hamper a clear definition of PRRT potential on meningiomas’ management.

23 May 2017 in Acta Oncologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDelia Ciardo
Delia Ciardo
AAAngela Argenone
Angela Argenone
GBGenoveva Ionela Boboc
Genoveva Ionela Boboc
FCFrancesca Cucciarelli
Francesca Cucciarelli
FRFiorenza De Rose
Fiorenza De Rose
O(on the behalf of the Breast Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO)
on the behalf of the Breast Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO)
Aim: To quantify the variability between radiation oncologists (ROs) when outlining axillary nodes in breast cancer. Material and methods: For each participating center, three ROs with different levels of expertise, i.e., junior (J), senior (S) and expert (E), contoured axillary nodal levels (L1, L2, L3 and L4) on the CT images of three different patients (P) of an increasing degree of anatomical complexity (from P1 to P2 to P3), according to contouring guidelines. Consensus contours were generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method. Results: Fifteen centers and 42 ROs participated. Overall, the median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.66. Statistically significant differences were observed according to the level of expertise (better agreement for J and E, worse for S); the axillary level (better agreement for L1 and L4, worse for L3); the patient (better agreement for P1, worse for P3). Statistically significant differences in contouring were found in 18% of the inter-center comparison. Less than a half of the centers could claim to have a good agreement between the internal ROs. Conclusions: The overall intra-institute and inter-institute agreement was moderate. Central lymph-node levels were the most critical and variability increased as the complexity of the patient’s anatomy increased. These findings might have an effect on the interpretation of results from multicenter and even mono-institute studies.