Introduction: Changing opiate prescribing practices in surgical fields without guidelines or standardizations can be a daunting task. An encouraging amount of literature has shown the benefits of reducing opioid use, but many plastic surgeons hesitate to initiate this directive. We present a practice modification designed to reduce the number of opiates prescribed and highlight the steps needed to implement a new prescribing algorithm. Methods: In October of 2023, we implemented a new opiate algorithm for patients undergoing breast surgery. In the preintervention group, patients received 30 pills of postoperative opiates and recorded their consumption. Following the intervention, patients were given a maximum of 10 pills. To guide this new prescribing practice, we relied on pill consumption analysis from our preintervention group. In each cohort, data were collected on postoperative analgesic use per procedure. Results: Forty-one survey responses were included in our preintervention cohort and 10 in our postintervention cohort. A median of 5.5 pills was consumed by patients who received implant or tissue expanders, 4.75 pills for pedicled flaps, 12 pills for fat grafting, 5 pills for breast reduction, and 12.5 pills for gender affirming mastectomies. Before and after the intervention, median opiate consumption was similar at 6 pills and 5.5 pills, respectively. Patients in both cohorts would consume pills for a median of 4 days. In the preintervention group, patients had a median of 24 unused pills. This was significantly reduced to 0.5 unused pills in the postintervention cohort (P < 0.000). Refill requirements and analgesic use by the 2 groups was not significantly different (P = 0.063 and P = 0.545). Conclusion: We have outlined a pathway for updating opioid prescribing algorithms in plastic surgery. Our opiate intervention significantly diminished opiate excess, reducing the risk for abuse. With growing research demonstrating the benefits of regulating prescriptions, and the best ways to implement change, surgeons can feel confident to just say yes to this meaningful reform.

Background: Lipedema is a progressive adipofascial disorder marked by painful nodular fat deposition that is often mistaken for obesity. While tumescent liposuction reduces limb volume with relative lymphatic safety, persistent large, painful lobules frequently remain, and excisional strategies risk iatrogenic lymphatic injury. We evaluated the application of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography to identify and preserve lymphatic channels during debulking surgery for symptomatic lipedema. Methods: We conducted a single-center case series (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, July 2023–December 2024) of adults with lipedema refractory to conservative therapy who underwent a selective dermato-lipectomy (lobule/skin excision) with or without tumescent liposuction. Patients with clinical lymphedema or dermal backflow in ICG were excluded. Near-infrared ICG (SPY-PHI) was used for pre-incision mapping and real-time intraoperative guidance; lymphatic trajectories were marked and spared during lobule excision. Primary measures included dermal backflow patterns and lymph node transit time; secondary outcomes were complications and symptom burden (Lymphedema Life Impact Scale, LLIS) through ≥24 months. Results: Eight patients (five female/three male; mean age 49.5 ± 14.4 years; median BMI 52.65 kg/m²) underwent ICG-guided surgery. Preoperatively, linear lymphatic patterns were visualized up to the knee in all patients, but dermal backflow patterns could not be visualized in 83% from the level of the knee to the groin. Still, 67% demonstrated inguinal nodal uptake (mean transit 24 min), suggesting preserved lymphatic transport. All cases achieved intraoperative confirmation of intact lymphatic flow after debulking. The mean liposuction aspirate was 925 ± 250 mL per lower extremity; the mean excision mass was 2209 ± 757 g per lower extremity. Complications included two superficial cellulitis events (25%) and one wound dehiscence (12.5%); no hematomas or skin necrosis occurred. No patient developed clinical or imaging evidence of iatrogenic lymphedema during follow-up. Conclusions: Intraoperative ICG lymphography is a practical adjunct for lymphatic-sparing debulking of symptomatic lipedema, enabling real-time identification and preservation of superficial collectors while addressing focal lobules. This hybrid approach—targeted tumescent liposuction followed by ICG-guided superficial dermato-lipectomy—was associated with meaningful symptom improvement and a low morbidity in this early series.

Introduction: Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) aims to reduce the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) by preserving and limiting dissection of arm-draining lymphatics. The ideal type of dye and the location of injection, which maximize the sparing of lymphatics and improve outcomes of immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR), remain under-studied. The current literature reports inconsistent visualization of lymphatics using blue dye alone, whereas indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared (NIR) lymphography has shown improved rates. However, optimized dual-dye workflows integrating breast–plastics co-surgery are lacking. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ILR following ALND for breast cancer between June 2021 and June 2023 was conducted. Patients who underwent ARM using our dual-dye technique were included, utilizing intradermal injections of indocyanine green (ICG) into the wrist and isosulfan blue (ISB) into the upper arm. Axillary reverse mapping channels were categorized by the type of dye used to visualize. Dye injection site, number of lymphatic channels visualized, channel diameter (mm), time-to-first channel, coordinates relative to fixed landmarks, ILR configuration, and pathologic findings were reviewed. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare channel visualization rates between types of dye. Results: Of 26 patients, 21 underwent dual-dye mapping and were included. A total of 115 ARM channels were identified: 99 (86%) via ICG and 29 (25%) via ISB. A total of 64 lymphaticovenous anastomoses were performed (mean: 2.46 per patient). Both dyes were identified in the axilla in only 11.7% of patients. At the end of the study, the lymphedema rate was 12%. Conclusions: We developed a reproducible dual-dye ARM technique for ALND with planned ILR, reducing lymphedema risk while maintaining oncologic safety. Dual-dye mapping reveals that proximal and distal lymphatics exhibit both overlapping and divergent drainage to axillary nodes. ICG’s higher axillary detection rate may reflect true anatomical differences or dye properties. These findings support the need for individualized lymphatic mapping during breast cancer surgery to guide preservation techniques and reduce the risk of BCRL.