Sho Kanzaki

Prof. Sho Kanzaki

Keio university
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2006 in Bone
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki
MIMasako Ito
Masako Ito
YTYasunari Takada
Yasunari Takada
KOKaoru Ogawa
Kaoru Ogawa
KMK. Matsuo
K. Matsuo

28 August 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki
MSMasafumi Sakagami
Masafumi Sakagami
HHHiroshi Hosoi
Hiroshi Hosoi
SMShingo Murakami
Shingo Murakami
KOKaoru Ogawa
Kaoru Ogawa
We used hearing tests and peripheral blood sample analyses to characterize the pathology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and to identify possible prognostic factors for predicting recovery of hearing loss. A retrospective, multicenter trial was conducted. Two hundred three patients examined within 7 days after the onset of ISSNHL received prednisone with lipo-prostaglandin E1. Pure-tone auditory tests were performed before and after treatment with these drugs. Blood tests were performed on blood samples collected during the patients’ initial visit to our clinic. In all patients, elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts, fasting blood sugar levels, HgbA1c, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) significantly correlated with high hearing threshold measurements obtained on the initial visit. High fibrinogen levels, WBC counts, ESR, and low concentrations of fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) were associated with lower hearing recovery rates. Additionally, different audiogram shapes correlated with different blood test factors, indicating that different pathologies were involved. High fibrinogen levels measured within seven days after ISSNHL onset correlated with poorer hearing recovery. This may be a consequence of ischemia or infections in the inner ear. The high WBC counts also observed may therefore reflect an immune response to inner ear damage induced by ischemic changes or infections. Our data indicate that therapeutic strategies should be selected based on the timing of initial treatment relative to ISSNHL onset.

1 February 2020 in Auris Nasus Larynx
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KOKaoru Ogawa
Kaoru Ogawa
HSHiroaki Sato
Hiroaki Sato
MTMariko Takahashi
Mariko Takahashi
TWTetsuro Wada
Tetsuro Wada
YNYasushi Naito
Yasushi Naito
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki
MTMasashi Toyoda
Masashi Toyoda
AUAkihiro Umezawa
Akihiro Umezawa
KOKaoru Ogawa
Kaoru Ogawa
Inner and middle ear disorders are the leading cause of hearing loss, and are said to be among the greatest risk factors of dementia. The use of regenerative medicine for the treatment of inner ear disorders may offer a potential alternative to cochlear implants for hearing recovery. In this paper, we reviewed recent research and clinical applications in middle and inner ear regeneration and cell therapy. Recently, the mechanism of inner ear regeneration has gradually been elucidated. “Inner ear stem cells,” which may be considered the precursors of various cells in the inner ear, have been discovered in the cochlea and vestibule. Research indicates that cells such as hair cells, neurons, and spiral ligaments may form promising targets for inner ear regenerative therapies by the transplantation of stem cells, including mesenchymal stem cells. In addition, it is necessary to develop tests for the clinical monitoring of cell transplantation. Real-time imaging techniques and hearing rehabilitation techniques are also being investigated, and cell therapy has found clinical application in cochlear implant techniques.

29 September 2020 in Surgical Innovation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki
STSatoshi Takahashi
Satoshi Takahashi
MTMasahiro Toda
Masahiro Toda
KYKazanari Yoshida
Kazanari Yoshida
KOKaoru Ogawa
Kaoru Ogawa
Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exoscope was retrospectively assessed in 6 otologic surgeries by 8 surgeons postoperatively. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions was designed and used for evaluation. Results. All the otologic surgeons agreed that the exoscope is useful as an educational tool; the exoscope had the highest score in the questionnaire (average: 4.75). The question “Will the ORBEYETM exoscope replace the conventional tympanoplasty or stapes surgery?” had the lowest score (average: 3.13). Conclusions. The quality of the images and movies in the exoscope was considered to be high and improved; therefore, the exoscope was considered as a useful educational tool in otologic surgery. Similar to otologic endoscopic surgery, all the members such as the operator and assistants could head up and share 1 image.

12 December 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sho KanzakiSho Kanzaki
Sho Kanzaki
MFMasato Fujioka
Masato Fujioka
AYAkimasa Yasuda
Akimasa Yasuda
SSShinsuke Shibata
Shinsuke Shibata
MNMasaya Nakamura
Masaya Nakamura
HOHideyuki Okano
Hideyuki Okano
Systemic steroid injections are used to treat idiopathic sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) and some inner ear disorders. Recent studies show that transtympanic (TT) steroid injections are effective for treating ISSHL. As in vivo monitoring of drug delivery dynamics for inner ear is lacking, its time course and dispersion of drugs is unknown. Here, we used a new in vivo imaging system to monitor drug delivery in live mice and to compare drug concentrations over time after TT and systemic injections. Luciferin delivered into the inner ears of GFAP-Luc transgenic mice reacted with luciferase in GFAP-expressing cells in the cochlear spiral ganglion, resulting in photon bioluminescence. We used the Xenogen IVIS® imaging system to measure how long photons continued to be emitted in the inner ear after TT or systemic injections of luciferin, and then compared the associated drug dynamics. The response to TT and IP injections differed significantly. Photons were detected five minutes after TT injection, peaking at ∼20 minutes. By contrast, photons were first detected 30 minutes after i.p. injection. TT and i.p. drug delivery time differed considerably. With TT injections, photons were detected earlier than with IP injections. Photon bioluminescence also disappeared sooner. Delivery time varied with TT injections. We speculate that the drug might enter the Eustachian tube from the middle ear. We conclude that inner-ear drug concentration can be maintained longer if the two injection routes are combined. As the size of luciferin differs from that of therapeutics like dexamethasone, combining drugs with luciferin may advance our understanding of in vivo drug delivery dynamics in the inner ear.