Purpose: This study investigated the combined effects of mirror therapy involving power and strength exercises of the upper extremities in children with Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy (USCP). Methods: Thirty children were included in either an experimental group or a control group. All participants were evaluated with the Quality of Upper Extremity Skill Test (QUEST), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), and a handheld dynamometer to measure isometric muscle strength. Results: Compared to the control group, greater improvement was found in dissociated movements (p < .001, d = 1.82), grasp (p < .001, d = 1.38), weight bearing (p = .006, d = 0.91), and total scores (p = .001, d = 1.16) of QUEST; performance (p < .001, d = 2.9), satisfaction (p < .001, d = 1.91), and total scores (p < .001, d = 2.87) of COPM; and isometric muscle strength of the biceps brachii (p < .001, d = 1.27) and triceps brachii (p = .002, d = 2.22) of the affected upper limbs in the experimental group. Conclusions: Mirror therapy combined with power and strength exercises is a promising intervention approach to improve activity performance and upper-limb function in children with USCP.

To determine the effect of family-based intervention on motor function in preterm infants. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial between August 2015 and September 2016. Forty-two preterm infants were randomized and split equally between the family-based intervention group, composed of a physiotherapeutic and a familial component (8 males, 8 females; mean age 91+/-3.09 days), and the traditional early intervention group (8 females, 8 males, mean age: 91.06+/-2.4 days). Both groups received a treatment program based on a neurodevelopmental approach during 3- to 12-months-old. The groups were evaluated at corrected ages of the third, sixth, ninth, twelfth, and 24th months using the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III). Within-group changes over time were statistically significant using multivariate tests of fine motor (Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA); F=1515.27, p less than 0.001) and gross motor (MANOVA; F=1950.59, p=0.001) development. However, there was no interaction between groups in fine (MANOVA; F=0.027, p=0.872) and gross motor development (MANOVA; F=0.022, p=0.883). The early intervention approaches might support fine and gross motor function development in preterm infants in the first year of life.