Natural orifice specimen extraction has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and wound complications, and provide better cosmetic outcome. However, whether transvaginal specimen extraction affects sexual function remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term outcomes, sexual function, cosmetic outcomes and prognosis after colon cancer surgery with transvaginal specimen extraction. This study was a propensity score-matched comparative retrospective study, based on prospectively collected data in a single center. This study included 70 pairs of propensity score-matched female patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for stage I-III colon cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction and conventional specimen extraction between November 2015 and November 2020. Covariates used in the propensity score included age, tumor diameter, tumor differentiation, T stage and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage. Outcome measures included postoperative complication, postoperative sexual function, cosmetic result, disease-free survival and overall survival. Patients in transvaginal group were administered with less additional analgesics (P = 0.008), and had fewer wound complications (P = 0.028). None of patient in the two groups underwent anastomotic leakage, incisional disruption or vaginal fistula. The baseline pre-operative Female Sexual Function Index scores in two groups were the same, and no difference was found in postoperative score between the two groups (P = 0.790). The cosmetic score was significantly better in transvaginal group than that of conventional laparoscopy group (P = 0.000). During the follow-up period, there were no differences in OS or DFS between the two groups (P = 0.658, P = 0.663). Compared with laparoscopic colon cancer radical resection with specimen extraction, transvaginal specimen extraction is oncologically safe, brings better short-term outcomes, improved cosmetic results and has limited adverse effect on female's sexual function. This procedure can be further carried out in more appropriate patients.

As science and technology have advanced, surgical techniques have become increasingly sophisticated. A revolution was triggered by the appearance of new electrical and optical instruments, shifting the field of surgery in the direction of “minimally invasive” and “noninvasive” procedures. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery has emerged as a rising star in the field of minimally invasive surgery. It has increased rapidly, and it has become a hot topic in recent years. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery has shown advantages in alleviating postoperative pain, improving bowel movements, providing a cosmetic effect, and improving psychological state without adversely affecting cancer outcomes. Different approaches have been classified and summarized for natural orifice specimen extraction surgery based on the procedure for specimen extraction and the location of the tumor, and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery can be used in resection all parts of the colorectum. The international natural orifice specimen extraction surgery consensus and monograph have also been published to improve the standardization of the application of this technique. Additional steps need to be taken to standardize natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, such as conducting large-scale randomized controlled trials, establishing a training system, and developing specific tools. Still, the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery procedure continues to follow the development of minimally invasive surgery and may be one of the future treatment options.

Totally laparoscopic right colectomy has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible. Two manners of anastomosis, namely, antiperistaltic and isoperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis, have been described before. However, research concerning the influence of different peristaltic orientations on anastomosis is rare and, if there is, included relatively small cases without long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis and antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis for right colectomy. We retrospectively reviewed 214 consecutive patients who underwent totally laparoscopic right colectomy from January 2017 to December 2020 at our medical center. Two modalities of anastomosis were used: isoperistaltic totally side-to-side anastomosis and antiperistaltic totally side-to-side anastomosis. Data on demographics, disease features, pathological characteristics, operative details, and short-term outcomes were collected and analyzed. We found that operative features such as operating time, intraoperative bleeding, length of resected intestine, number of harvested lymph nodes, and length of incision, as well as measures of postoperative recovery such as time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and length of stay, were statistically comparable between the 2 groups. The postoperative complication rate was also similar between the 2 groups. The median follow-up time was 35.6 months, and no differences were observed in the long-term outcomes. Intracorporeal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis can achieve short- and long-term outcomes similar to those of antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis. Both techniques are safe and feasible.

Introduction: While intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) has been widely used in totally laparoscopic right colectomy, its application in laparoscopic segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer remains underexplored, particularly in large-scale studies with long-term outcomes. This research aims to assess the technical feasibility and oncological efficacy of IA in treating colonic splenic flexure carcinoma, drawing insights from both short-term and long-term outcomes of a retrospective cohort. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 342 patients diagnosed with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma in three Chinese medical centers. These patients underwent laparoscopic segmental left colectomy between December 2014 and December 2019 across three medical institutions. Comprehensive data encompassing demographics, disease features, pathological characteristics, operative details, and both short-term and long-term outcomes were gathered and scrutinized. Using propensity scores, each patient from the IA cohort was paired with a counterpart from the extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) cohort. Results: IA was performed on 129 patients, while 213 underwent EA. Post-propensity score matching resulted in 129 matched pairs. After matching, many baseline characteristics were balanced. The IA cohort exhibited several advantages, including shorter incision lengths (P<0.001) and more extensive proximal and distal resection margins (P=0.003, P<0.001). Additionally, the IA method facilitated a more rapid postoperative recovery as indicated by quicker return of bowel movements (resumption of passing flatus [2.7 (1.0–7.0) days vs. 3.3 (2.0–8.0) days, P<0.001] and defecation [3.7 (1.0–9.0)] days vs. 4.5 (2.0–9.0) days, P<0.001]), faster discharges [6.6 (3.0–15.0) days vs. 8.3 (5.0–20.0) days, P<0.001], and decreased need for rescue analgesics (P<0.001). The rate of postoperative complications, as rated by the Clavien–Dindo classification, remained consistent across both techniques (P=0.087). Furthermore, the cosmetic outcome rated by Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire and Scoring System (PSAQ) was markedly superior in the IA group (P<0.001). Both approaches demonstrated equivalent 5-year overall (82.7% vs. 82.1%, P=0.419) and disease-free survival (80.9% vs. 78.1%, P=0.476). Subsequent stratification analysis revealed that IA achieved comparable 5-year overall (80.7% vs. 82.0%, P=0.647) and disease-free survival (78.1% vs. 76.4%, P=0.734) in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Conclusion: Employing IA for laparoscopic segmental left colectomy in cases of splenic flexure carcinoma is not only safe but also offers enhanced cosmetic results and expedited postoperative recovery. Oncologically speaking, IA in left segmental colectomy for splenic flexure carcinoma can yield therapeutic outcomes comparable to those of EA, even in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models are increasingly used for medical information retrieval, due to their accessibility and efficiency. However, the accuracy and readability of their responses, specifically for upper gastrointestinal cancers, remain inadequately evaluated. This gap highlights the need for rigorous assessment to ensure reliable patient education and clinical integration. Objective: This study aimed to assess the accuracy and readability of responses generated by four prominent GenAI models (Kimi, DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and Gemini) when addressing patient-focused questions related to esophageal and gastric cancers. Methods: Twenty-five standardized medical questions about esophageal and gastric cancer covering domains of disease definition, treatment and management were posed to each model. Responses were assessed by four oncologists for accuracy by a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed for readability using Flesch–Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, and SMOG metrics. High-interest questions for patients were identified via questionnaires. Results: Comparing the accuracy of GenAI-generated responses, DeepSeek achieved the highest overall accuracy score and outperformed other models in questions about definitions and treatments, while ChatGPT excelled in management-related inquiries. In subgroup analysis, GenAI models exhibited higher accuracy in answering definition and management questions, which patients preferred to inquire, compared with questions about cancer therapies. The responses produced by all models required a reading capacity from 11th-grade to college level. Conclusions: This study revealed that in this comparative evaluation application of GenAI models, DeepSeek provides the most accurate responses for upper GI cancer inquiries about definition and treatment, while ChatGPT showed superiority in management-related questions. However, all models generate texts requiring advanced reading levels, highlighting a need for readability optimization without compromising accuracy. GenAI shows promise for patient education but requires rigorous validation for clinical integration.