Roberto Caracciolo

Prof. Roberto Caracciolo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2002 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BAB. Aubert
B. Aubert
ABA. Bazan
A. Bazan
ABA. Boucham
A. Boucham
DBD. Boutigny
D. Boutigny
IBI. De Bonis
I. De Bonis
HNH. Neal
H. Neal

1 January 2013 in Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni BoschettiGiovanni Boschetti
Giovanni Boschetti
RCRoberto Caracciolo
Roberto Caracciolo
Dario RichiedeiDario Richiedei
Dario Richiedei
ATAlberto Trevisani
Alberto Trevisani

1 May 2004 in Journal of Sound and Vibration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRoberto Caracciolo
Roberto Caracciolo
AGA. Gasparetto
A. Gasparetto
MGM. Giovagnoni
M. Giovagnoni

19 May 2021 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIrene Mirandola
Irene Mirandola
GBGuido Andrea Berti
Guido Andrea Berti
RCRoberto Caracciolo
Roberto Caracciolo
SLSeungro Lee
Seungro Lee
NKNak Soo Kim
Nak Soo Kim
Luca QuagliatoLuca Quagliato
Luca Quagliato
This research provides an insight on the performances of machine learning (ML)-based algorithms for the estimation of the energy consumption in metal forming processes and is applied to the radial-axial ring rolling process. To define the mutual influence between ring geometry, process settings, and ring rolling mill geometries with the resulting energy consumption, measured in terms of the force integral over the processing time (FIOT), FEM simulations have been implemented in the commercial SW Simufact Forming 15. A total of 380 finite element simulations with rings ranging from 650 mm < DF < 2000 mm have been implemented and constitute the bulk of the training and validation datasets. Both finite element simulation settings (input), as well as the FI (output), have been utilized for the training of eight machine learning models, implemented with Python scripts. The results allow defining that the Gradient Boosting (GB) method is the most reliable for the FIOT prediction in forming processes, being its maximum and average errors equal to 9.03% and 3.18%, respectively. The trained ML models have been also applied to own and literature experimental cases, showing a maximum and average error equal to 8.00% and 5.70%, respectively, thus proving once again its reliability.

4 March 2014 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giovanni BoschettiGiovanni Boschetti
Giovanni Boschetti
RCRoberto Caracciolo
Roberto Caracciolo
Dario RichiedeiDario Richiedei
Dario Richiedei
ATAlberto Trevisani
Alberto Trevisani

1 June 2014 in Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni BoschettiGiovanni Boschetti
Giovanni Boschetti
RCRoberto Caracciolo
Roberto Caracciolo
Dario RichiedeiDario Richiedei
Dario Richiedei
ATAlberto Trevisani
Alberto Trevisani