Besides the physiological regulation of water, sodium, and potassium homeostasis, aldosterone modulates several physiological and pathological processes in the cardiovascular system. At the vascular level, aldosterone excess stimulates endothelial dysfunction and infiltration of inflammatory cells, enhances the development of the atherosclerotic plaque, and favors plaque instability, arterial stiffness, and calcification. At the cardiac level, aldosterone increases cardiac inflammation, fibrosis, and myocardial hypertrophy. As a clinical consequence, high aldosterone levels are associated with enhanced risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, especially when aldosterone secretion is inappropriate for renin levels and sodium intake, as in primary aldosteronism. Several clinical trials showed that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, but inconclusive results were reported for other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. In patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenalectomy or treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists significantly mitigate adverse aldosterone effects, reducing the risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, and incident atrial fibrillation. In this review, we will summarize the major preclinical and clinical studies investigating the cardiovascular damage mediated by aldosterone and the protective effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for the reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with cardiovascular diseases and primary aldosteronism.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) including plasma membrane–derived microvesicles and endosomal-derived exosomes aggregate by unknown mechanisms, forming microcalcifications that promote cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Here, we show a framework for assessing cell-independent EV mechanisms in disease by suggesting that annexin A1 (ANXA1)–dependent tethering induces EV aggregation and microcalcification. We present single-EV microarray, a method to distinguish microvesicles from exosomes and assess heterogeneity at a single-EV level. Single-EV microarray and proteomics revealed increased ANXA1 primarily on aggregating and calcifying microvesicles. ANXA1 vesicle aggregation was suppressed by calcium chelation, altering pH, or ANXA1 neutralizing antibody. ANXA1 knockdown attenuated EV aggregation and microcalcification formation in human cardiovascular cells and acellular three-dimensional collagen hydrogels. Our findings explain why microcalcifications are more prone to form in vulnerable regions of plaque, regulating critical cardiovascular pathology, and likely extend to other EV-associated diseases, including autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized membrane-bound structures released by cells that are able to transfer nucleic acids, protein cargos, and metabolites to specific recipient cells, allowing cell-to-cell communications in an endocrine and paracrine manner. Endothelial, leukocyte, and platelet-derived EVs have emerged both as biomarkers and key effectors in the development and progression of different stages of vascular damage, from earliest alteration of endothelial function, to advanced atherosclerotic lesions and cardiovascular calcification. Under pathological conditions, circulating EVs promote endothelial dysfunction by impairing vasorelaxation and instigate vascular inflammation by increasing levels of adhesion molecules, reactive oxygen species, and proinflammatory cytokines. Platelets, endothelial cells, macrophages, and foam cells secrete EVs that regulate macrophage polarization and contribute to atherosclerotic plaque progression. Finally, under pathological stimuli, smooth muscle cells and macrophages secrete EVs that aggregate between collagen fibers and serve as nucleation sites for ectopic mineralization in the vessel wall, leading to formation of micro- and macrocalcification. In this review, we summarize the emerging evidence of the pathological role of EVs in vascular damage, highlighting the major findings from the most recent studies and discussing future perspectives in this research field.

Aldosterone producing adenoma and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are the two most common subtypes of primary aldosteronism (PA) that require targeted and distinct therapeutic approaches: unilateral adrenalectomy or lifelong medical therapy with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. According to the 2016 Endocrine Society Guideline, adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard test to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral aldosterone overproduction and therefore, to safely refer patients with PA to surgery. Despite significant advances in the optimization of the AVS procedure and the interpretation of hormonal data, a standardized protocol across centers is still lacking. Alternative methods are sought to either localize an aldosterone producing adenoma or to predict the presence of unilateral disease and thereby substantially reduce the number of patients with PA who proceed to AVS. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in subtyping PA for the diagnosis of unilateral and bilateral disease. We focus on the developments in the AVS procedure, the interpretation criteria, and comparisons of the performance of AVS with the alternative methods that are currently available.

Hypertension (HTN) affects about 1 billion people worldwide and the lack of a single identifiable cause complicates its treatment. Blood pressure (BP) levels are influenced by environmental factors, but there is a strong genetic component. Linkage analysis has identified several genes involved in Mendelian forms of HTN and the associated pathophysiological mechanisms have been unravelled, leading to targeted therapies. The majority of these syndromes are due to gain-of-function or loss-of-functions mutations, resulting in an alteration of mineralocorticoid, glucocorticoid, or sympathetic pathways. The diagnosis of monogenic forms of HTN has limited practical implications on the population and a systematic genetic screening is not justifiable. Genome-wide linkage and association studies (GWAS) have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which influence BP. Forty-three variants have been described with each SNP affecting systolic and diastolic BP by 1.0 and 0.5 mmHg, respectively. Taken together Mendelian inheritance and all GWAS-identified HTN-associated variants explain 2–3% of BP variance. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs, have become increasingly recognized as important players in BP regulation and may justify a further part of missing heritability. In this review, we will discuss how genetics and genomics may assist clinicians in managing patients with HTN.

BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients with arterial hypertension have a positive screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA) and 50% to 70% of them have a negative confirmatory test: the appropriate follow-up of these patients is currently unknown. We investigated the incidence of PA in patients with previous negative confirmatory testing, after at least a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: One hundred eighty-four patients with a previously elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio followed by a negative confirmatory test were recruited in 2 hypertension centers (Torino and Munich). We repeated the screening test for PA and, if positive, the confirmatory test (seated saline infusion test or captopril challenge test). Primary end point of the study was the incidence of newly diagnosed overt PA, as defined by a positive confirmatory test. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 5 years, 20% of patients developed overt PA. When subtype diagnosis was offered systematically, one-third of patients displayed unilateral PA. Patients who developed PA showed worsening of blood pressure control and a higher rate of cardiac organ damage, despite similar implementation of antihypertensive therapy, compared with patients without PA. A mild progression of autonomous aldosterone secretion was evident even in patients without confirmed PA but with relatively stable control of blood pressure levels over time. CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth of patients with a negative confirmatory test develop overt PA over time. A clinical follow-up of patients with a negative confirmatory test is advisable, along with the repetition of PA investigation, primarily in patients with worsening of blood pressure control.