Ritchele Redivo Marchese

Ms. Ritchele Redivo Marchese


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKatia Daniele Rech
Katia Daniele Rech
ASAna Paula Salazar
Ana Paula Salazar
RMRitchele Redivo Marchese
Ritchele Redivo Marchese
GSGiulia Schifino
Giulia Schifino
VCVeronica Cimolin
Veronica Cimolin
APAline Souza Pagnussat
Aline Souza Pagnussat

1 February 2018 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAna Paula S. Salazar
Ana Paula S. Salazar
PVPatrícia G. Vaz
Patrícia G. Vaz
RMRitchele Redivo Marchese
Ritchele Redivo Marchese
CSCinara Stein
Cinara Stein
CPCamila Pinto
Camila Pinto
APAline Souza Pagnussat
Aline Souza Pagnussat

8 February 2019 in Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPatricia Graef Vaz
Patricia Graef Vaz
ASAna Paula da Silva Salazar
Ana Paula da Silva Salazar
CSCinara Stein
Cinara Stein
RMRitchele Redivo Marchese
Ritchele Redivo Marchese
JLJanice Luisa Lukrafka
Janice Luisa Lukrafka
APAline Souza Pagnussat
Aline Souza Pagnussat
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques able to modulate cortical excitability. To determine the effects of NIBS combined with other therapies on gait speed after stroke. Electronic databases searched were PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, SCIELO and PEDro. Eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials that reported the effects of tDCS and rTMS combined with other therapies for improving gait speed, walking cadence, functional ambulation category (FAC) and motricity index (MI-LE) after stroke. Risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Quality of evidence was assessed by Grades of Researches, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Ten studies (226 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. NIBS combined with other therapies was effective for improving gait speed (MD 0.09 m/s [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13; I2 0%, p < 0.0001]). Gait speed improved in both acute/subacute (MD 0.08 m/s [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.14]) and chronic phases (MD 0.08 m/s [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.13]). Furthermore, inhibitory (MD 0.09 m/s [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.14]) and excitatory (MD 0.07 m/s [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.12]) protocols were effective to improve gait speed. NIBS was also effective to improve walking cadence but was unable to modify other outcomes (FAC and MI-LE). This systematic review with meta-analysis synthesizes moderate-quality evidence that NIBS combined with other therapies are effective to improve gait speed after stroke. Systematic Review registration number: PROSPERO registration number CDR42015024237.


1 January 2020 in Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAna Paula Salazar
Ana Paula Salazar
VCVeronica Cimolin
Veronica Cimolin
GSGiulia Palermo Schifino
Giulia Palermo Schifino
KRKátia Daniele Rech
Kátia Daniele Rech
RMRitchele Redivo Marchese
Ritchele Redivo Marchese
APAline Souza Pagnussat
Aline Souza Pagnussat

1 December 2018 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAna Francisca Rozin Kleiner
Ana Francisca Rozin Kleiner
APAline Souza Pagnussat
Aline Souza Pagnussat
CPCamila Pinto
Camila Pinto
RMRitchele Redivo Marchese
Ritchele Redivo Marchese
ASAna Paula Salazar
Ana Paula Salazar
MGManuela Galli
Manuela Galli