Lorena Medina

Dr. Lorena Medina


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
M. Pilar MatudM. Pilar Matud
M. Pilar Matud
LMLorena Medina
Lorena Medina
IIIGNACIO IBANEZ
IGNACIO IBANEZ
María José del Pino EspejoMaría José del Pino Espejo
María José del Pino Espejo
Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has had severe and far-reaching repercussions for health systems and societies, creating a global mental health crisis that has persisted after the pandemic. This study examined differences in mental health (i.e., psychological distress and well-being) by gender and pandemic period (i.e., lockdown, second and third pandemic waves, the last year of the pandemic, and the post-pandemic period) among Spanish individuals in two stages of adulthood: established adulthood and midlife. The second objective was to identify the risk and protective factors for psychological distress and well-being during the post-pandemic period. Materials and Methods: The study design was repeated cross-sectionally. The non-probability sample included 3677 people (66.2% women) from the general Spanish population, aged 30 to 59 years. Participants were assessed between 1 June 2020 and 23 May 2024 using the following self-reports: the General Health Questionnaire-12 item version, the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience, the Brief Inventory of Thriving, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Social Support Scale, the Stressful Events Questionnaire, the Brief Resilience Scale, and the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Questionnaire. Results: Although rates of psychological distress varied across pandemic periods, women consistently experienced higher rates than men. During the post-pandemic period, the rates of psychological distress were 47.5% for women in established adulthood and 34.7% for midlife women, compared to 28.6% and 22% for men, respectively. Low self-esteem was the main predictor of greater psychological distress and lower well-being for both genders and age groups in the post-pandemic period. Another significant predictor was lower stress resilience. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic threatened women’s mental health and well-being more than men’s, and this threat persists after the pandemic, especially among women in established adulthood. The study’s findings are relevant for the design of policies, programs, and strategies to achieve better mental health and well-being among citizens and greater gender equality.

18 May 2026 in Sexes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
M. Pilar MatudM. Pilar Matud
M. Pilar Matud
LMLorena Medina
Lorena Medina
CRCarmen Rodríguez-Wangüemert
Carmen Rodríguez-Wangüemert
IIIGNACIO IBANEZ
IGNACIO IBANEZ
Sexual objectification is the treatment of a person as a body or a collection of body parts that are valued primarily for their sexual appeal. The main purpose of this study was to determine the relevance of sexual objectification to women’s health and well-being across the life cycle, from middle adolescence to old age. Additionally, the relevance of age and education to sexual objectification and its association with traditional gender role attitudes was examined. This study was cross-sectional and the sample consisted of 6112 Spanish women between the ages of 16 and 85, who were assessed using seven questionnaires and scales. The results show that lower age and lower number of children were associated with greater importance of sexual and physical attractiveness and with a more sexualized image, although there were no differences between adolescent and emerging adult women. Greater importance placed on sexual and physical attractiveness, as well as total sexual objectification, was associated with greater mental distress, lower psychological well-being, lower life satisfaction, and lower self-esteem at every life stage. Greater importance placed on sexual and physical attractiveness was associated with more traditional gender role attitudes among all age groups, except for older women. We conclude that sexual objectification is a threat to women’s mental health and well-being.

3 March 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
M. Pilar MatudM. Pilar Matud
M. Pilar Matud
LMLorena Medina
Lorena Medina
CRCarmen Rodríguez-Wangüemert
Carmen Rodríguez-Wangüemert
IIIGNACIO IBANEZ
IGNACIO IBANEZ
Sexual objectification is the treatment of a person as a body or a collection of body parts that are valued primarily for their sexual appeal. The main purpose of this study was to determine the relevance of sexual objectification to women's health and well-being across the life cycle, from middle adolescence to old age. Additionally, the relevance of age and education to sexual objectification and its association with traditional gender role attitudes was examined. The study was cross-sectional and the sample consisted of 6,112 Spanish women between the ages of 16 and 85, who were assessed using seven questionnaires and scales. The results showed that lower age and lower number of children were associated with greater importance of sexual and physical attractiveness and with a more sexualized image, although there were no differences between adolescent and emerging adult women. Greater importance placed on sexual and physical attractiveness, as well as total sexual objectification, was associated with greater mental distress, lower psychological well-being, lower life satisfaction, and lower self-esteem at every life stage. Greater importance placed on sexual and physical attractiveness was associated with more traditional gender role attitudes among all age groups, except for older women. We conclude that sexual objectification is a threat to women's mental health and well-being.