Utkucan Ayeser

Dr. Utkucan Ayeser

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 October 2025 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMustafa Onel
Mustafa Onel
Hayriye Kırkoyun UysalHayriye Kırkoyun Uysal
Hayriye Kırkoyun Uysal
EEEv Ev
Ev Ev
UAUtkucan Ayeser
Utkucan Ayeser
Kutay SarsarKutay Sarsar
Kutay Sarsar
AAAli Agacfidan
Ali Agacfidan
(1) Background: This study investigated the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV), HPV genotypes, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) in patients with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) at both molecular and serological levels. (2) Methods Fifty patients with histopathologically confirmed HNC who were admitted to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Viral DNA was detected using quantitative real-time PCR, and serological IgM and IgG antibodies were analyzed using the CMIA method; (3) Results: In blood samples, CMV and HSV DNA were not detected, whereas EBV DNA was identified in 2% and HPV DNA in 4% of patients. In tumor tissues, CMV DNA was detected in 8%, EBV DNA in 10%, and HPV DNA in 6%; HSV DNA is 6%. HPV genotypes 18, 45, and 69 were found in tissue samples. Serologically, IgG positivity for CMV, EBV, and HSV-1 exceeded 90%, whereas IgM positivity was low and not statistically significant; (4) Conclusions: HPV, EBV, and CMV DNA were detected at low frequencies in patients with HNC, while HSV DNA was absent. These findings underline the need for larger multi-center studies and support the consideration of routine viral screening, particularly for HPV, in specific tumor subtypes.

27 February 2026 in Balkan ORL-HNS
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSaid Sönmez
Said Sönmez
ÖOÖmer Orak
Ömer Orak
YGYahya Güldiken
Yahya Güldiken
UAUtkucan Ayeser
Utkucan Ayeser
MÇMehmet Çelik
Mehmet Çelik
KOKadir Serhan Orhan
Kadir Serhan Orhan
Background: To compare patient-reported outcomes following percutaneous and transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent BAHA implantation at a tertiary university center between 2011 and 2023, with a median follow-up of 95.50 months [IQR: 37.00-132.00] (range, 16-158 months). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the validated GBI, which evaluates general benefit, social benefit, physical health, and a total score. Glasgow Benefit Inventory scores were compared between percutaneous and transcutaneous BAHA users. Owing to the limited number of patients, the softband group was evaluated descriptively only. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: A total of 46 patients were included: 33 transcutaneous and 13 percutaneous BAHA users. The general benefit score was significantly higher in the percutaneous group than in the transcutaneous group (median [IQR]: 83.34 [37.50-89.58] vs. 41.67 [20.83-70.83], P = .032). Total GBI scores were numerically higher in the percutaneous group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .069). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of social benefit (P = .157) or physical health (P = .502). Conclusion: Both percutaneous and transcutaneous BAHA implantation provided meaningful patient-reported benefit. Percutaneous BAHA was associated with a significantly higher general benefit score, while total, social, and physical health benefits were comparable between techniques. These findings emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up and individualized device selection. Cite this article as: Sönmez S, Orak Ö, Güldiken Y, et al. Long-term glasgow benefit inventory outcomes in patients using transcutaneous versus percutaneous bone-anchored hearing devices. Balkan ORL-HNS. 2026, 3, 0135, 10.5152/bohns.2026.25135.

19 June 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MOMustafa Onel
Mustafa Onel
Hayriye Kırkoyun UysalHayriye Kırkoyun Uysal
Hayriye Kırkoyun Uysal
EEEv Ev
Ev Ev
UAUtkucan Ayeser
Utkucan Ayeser
Kutay SarsarKutay Sarsar
Kutay Sarsar
AAAli Ağaçfidan
Ali Ağaçfidan
Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the prevalence of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) in patients with head and neck cancer, in relation to age, sex, tumor type, and risk factors, at both molecular and serological levels. Materials and Methods: Data from 50 patients diagnosed histopathologically with head and neck cancer who were admitted to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, between April 2023 and April 2024 were reviewed. At the time of diagnosis, venous blood and tumor biopsy tissue were collected from all cases. CMV, EBV, HPV, and HSV DNA were investigated in both blood and biopsy samples using quantitative real-time PCR. Serologically, IgM and IgG levels were measured using the CMIA method. The data were analyzed along with demographic and clinical parameters. Results: In blood samples, CMV and HSV DNA were not detected, while EBV DNA was found to be positive in 2% and HPV DNA in 4% of the cases. In biopsy tissues, CMV DNA was detected in 8%, EBV DNA in 10%, and HPV DNA in 6% of the samples; HSV DNA was also not detected in tissue samples. HPV DNA positivity showed a statistically significant variation according to tumor type and was more frequently detected in the subtypes of tongue SCC and retromolar SCC (p = 0.005). In serological evaluation, IgG positivity for CMV, EBV, and HSV-1 was above 90%, whereas IgM positivity for all viruses was low and not statistically significant. Conclusion: Among patients with head and neck cancer, the overall positivity rates for HPV, EBV, and CMV DNA were low, and HSV DNA was not detected. The higher prevalence of HPV in specific tumor subtypes suggests a selective role of this virus in head and neck cancers. These findings highlight that the viral etiology of head and neck cancers may vary depending on tumor subtype and individual factors, emphasizing the importance of regional epidemiological data.