Light makes light work of fatty acids: Photosynthetic organisms are notable for their ability to capture light energy and use it to power biosynthesis. Some algae have gone a step beyond photosynthesis and can use light to initiate enzymatic photodecarboxylation of fatty acids, producing long-chain hydrocarbons. To understand this transformation, Sorigué et al. brought to bear an array of structural, computational, and spectroscopic techniques and fully characterized the catalytic cycle of the enzyme. These experiments are consistent with a mechanism starting with electron transfer from the fatty acid to a photoexcited oxidized flavin cofactor. Decarboxylation yields an alkyl radical, which is then reduced by back electron transfer and protonation rather than hydrogen atom transfer. The wealth of experimental data explains how algae harness light energy to produce alka(e)nes and provides an appealing model system for understanding enzyme-catalyzed photochemistry more generally. Science , this issue p. eabd5687
19 May 2021 in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Tyrosine kinases transmit cellular signals through a complex mechanism, involving their phosphorylation and switching between inactive and active conformations. The cancer drug imatinib binds tightly to several homologous kinases, including Abl, but weakly to others, including Src. Imatinib specifically targets the inactive, so-called "DFG-out" conformation of Abl, which differs from the preferred, "DFG-in" conformation of Src in the orientation of a conserved Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG) activation loop. However, recent x-ray structures showed that Src can also adopt the DFG-out conformation and uses it to bind imatinib. The Src/Abl-binding free energy difference can thus be decomposed into two contributions. Contribution i measures the different protein-imatinib interactions when either kinase is in its DFG-out conformation. Contribution ii depends on the ability of imatinib to select or induce this conformation, i.e. on the relative stabilities of the DFG-out and DFG-in conformations of each kinase. Neither contribution has been measured experimentally. We use molecular dynamics simulations to show that contribution i is very small, 0.2 +/- 0.6 kcal/mol; imatinib interactions are very similar in the two kinases, including long range electrostatic interactions with the imatinib positive charge. Contribution ii, deduced using the experimental binding free energy difference, is much larger, 4.4 +/- 0.9 kcal/mol. Thus, conformational selection, easy in Abl, difficult in Src, underpins imatinib specificity. Contribution ii has a simple interpretation; it closely approximates the stability difference between the DFG-out and DFG-in conformations of apo-Src. Additional calculations show that conformational selection also governs the relative binding of imatinib to the kinases c-Kit and Lck. These results should help clarify the current framework for engineering kinase signaling.