Marcela Nour (Cârlig)

Dr. Marcela Nour (Cârlig)


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGabriela Calin
Gabriela Calin
MCMihnea Costescu
Mihnea Costescu
M(Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
CSCamer Salim
Camer Salim
NLNicu Ovidiu Lungu
Nicu Ovidiu Lungu
LDLetiția Doina Duceac
Letiția Doina Duceac
Fractures are becoming a bigger and bigger global health problem, with an estimated 178 million new cases each year and 455 million people living with disabilities caused by fractures. Donor site morbidity, the risk of immune rejection, and limited functional integration all make current grafting techniques less effective. Biomaterials that come from nature, like collagen, gelatin, chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid (HA), and silk fibroin, have become promising scaffolds because they are bioactive, mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), and can be broken down by enzymes. Crosslinking and composite reinforcement can greatly change how well they work. For example, collagen scaffolds that are highly crosslinked with glutaraldehyde keep up to 51.9% of their tensile strength after being exposed to enzymes, while non-crosslinked scaffolds only keep 12% of their strength. Chitosan–hydroxyapatite matrices, on the other hand, can reach compressive strengths of 2–12 MPa, which is close to the strength of cancellous bone. Additive manufacturing and 4D printing allow for precise control of structures and the ability to change their shape over time, which helps with vascularization and mechanical adaptation. Injectable and in situ-forming hydrogels show clinically important results, such as filling 85% of osteochondral defects in rabbits, improving left ventricular ejection fraction by up to 9% in large-animal cardiac models, and speeding up healing by 25–40% in chronic wounds. Even with these improvements, it is still hard to get batch consistency, a standardized way to test mechanical properties, and production that meets GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) standards and can be scaled up.

2 March 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSimona Irina Damian
Simona Irina Damian
SDSofia Mihaela David
Sofia Mihaela David
M(Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
LHLiliana Gabriela Halitchi
Liliana Gabriela Halitchi
SCSorina Alexandra Ciurlea
Sorina Alexandra Ciurlea
DSDoina Spaiuc
Doina Spaiuc
Intranasal drug delivery represents a transformative “backdoor” to the brain, bypassing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) that bars 98% of small molecules and nearly all large biopharmaceuticals. By harnessing the unique anatomy of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, therapeutics can travel directly from the nasal cavity to the central nervous system, achieving therapeutic concentrations without the systemic toxicity of traditional routes. Clinical and preclinical evidence highlight the efficacy of intranasal insulin (INI) in treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and delirium, with studies showing significant improvements in cognitive scores and reduced hospital stays (7.9 vs. 12.9 days; p = 0.014). Additionally, other peptides can be administered intranasally like oxytocin, neuropeptide Y, and novel metabolic modulators for neuroprotection and affective disorders (AD, autism, Down syndrome). Despite these promises, critical translational gaps remain, including anatomical differences between macrosmatic rodents and microsmatic humans, and significant sex-based dosing dimorphism. The ease of intranasal administration introduces profound bioethical dilemmas regarding neuroenhancement, authenticity, and informed consent in vulnerable populations. The current literature concludes that realizing the full potential of nose-to-brain (N2B) therapy requires a commitment to precision medicine, utilizing specialized delivery devices and objective biomarkers to ensure safe and equitable clinical application.

30 July 2025 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GABRIELA CALIN (MIHALACHE)GABRIELA CALIN (MIHALACHE)
GABRIELA CALIN (MIHALACHE)
MCMihnea Costescu
Mihnea Costescu
M(Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
Marcela Nour (Cârlig)
TCTudor Ciuhodaru
Tudor Ciuhodaru
DBDenisa Batir-Marin
Denisa Batir-Marin
DDDaniela Liliana Damir
Daniela Liliana Damir
According to the World Health Organization, musculoskeletal injuries affect more than 1.71 billion people around the world. These injuries are a major public health issue and the leading cause of disability. There has been a recent interest in hydrogels as a potential biomaterial for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. This is due to their high water content (70–99%), ECM-like structure, injectability, and controllable degradation rates. Recent preclinical studies indicate that they can enhance regeneration by modulating the release of bioactive compounds, growth factors, and stem cells. Composite hydrogels that combine natural and synthetic polymers, like chitosan and collagen, have compressive moduli that are advantageous for tendon–bone healing. Some of these hydrogels can even hold up to 0.8 MPa of tensile strength. In osteoarthritis models, functionalized systems such as microspheres responsive to matrix metalloproteinase-13 have demonstrated disease modulation and targeted drug delivery, while intelligent in situ hydrogels have exhibited a 43% increase in neovascularization and a 50% enhancement in myotube production. Hydrogel-based therapies have been shown to restore contractile force by as much as 80%, increase myofiber density by 65%, and boost ALP activity in bone defects by 2.1 times in volumetric muscle loss (VML) models. Adding TGF-β3 or MSCs to hydrogel systems improved GAG content by about 60%, collagen II expression by 35–50%, and O’Driscoll scores by 35–50% in cartilage regeneration.