Assel Kabibulatova

Dr. Assel Kabibulatova


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAssel Kabibulatova
Assel Kabibulatova
MKMehzabin Kazi
Mehzabin Kazi
PBPeter Berglund
Peter Berglund
MBMalin Båtsman
Malin Båtsman
UOUlrika Ottander
Ulrika Ottander
SSSara Strandberg
Sara Strandberg
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of imaging-based biomarkers from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of malignant and borderline malignant ovarian tumours. Methods: 195 consecutive patients with suspected primary epithelial ovarian cancer were included from the retrospective “Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynaecological Cancer” (PRODIGYN) study. The radiological stage, according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics system (rFIGO), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS-MRI) score, and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) were investigated for prediction of ovarian malignancy, with histopathology as reference. The same imaging biomarkers were applied to the borderline tumour cohort (n = 33) to predict malignant/adverse features, such as micro-invasion. Results: The rFIGO stage demonstrated high accuracy for ovarian malignancy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97–0.99). On lesion level, the sensitivity and specificity of the O-RADS-MRI score to predict ovarian malignancy, after adjusting for correlated data structure, was 1 (CI: 0.96–1) and 0.82 (CI: 0.70–0.90), respectively. The performance of ADCmean to predict ovarian malignancy on lesion level was moderately high, with AUC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.68, 0.88). Discrimination of adverse features in borderline tumours was not improved. Conclusions: rFIGO and O-RADS-MRI showed excellent performance and outperformed ADCmean as predictive tools for ovarian malignancy but could not predict adverse features in borderline tumours.