Background: The mortality rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) have surged globally over the past two decades. While the underlying reasons remain largely unknown, understanding its epidemiology is crucial to address this escalating trend. This study aimed to identify disparities potentially influencing these rates, enhancing risk assessment tools, and highlighting areas necessitating further research. Methods: Using the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database, this study assessed EOCRC mortality data from 2012 to 2020. Individuals under 50 years who succumbed to EOCRC were identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Data interpretation and representation were performed using R 4.2.2 software. Results: Between 2012 and 2020, EOCRC mortality rates fluctuated marginally between 1.7 and 1.8 per 100,000. Male mortality rates increased from 1.9 to 2.0 per 100,000, while female rates varied between 1.5 and 1.6 per 100,000. Significant variations were observed across age groups, with the 40–49 years category experiencing an increase from 6.34 (2012) to 6.94 (2020) per 100,000. Racial category-based data revealed the highest mortality rates among African Americans. Geographically, Mississippi and Alabama exhibited elevated mortality rates. Age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) assessments indicated a marked decline for both genders from 2012 to 2020, with consistently higher rates for men. Conclusion: The findings highlight the evolving landscape of EOCRC mortality, revealing significant gender, age, and racial disparities. These results underscore the urgent need for tailored health strategies and intensified research efforts targeting these disparities.

Background: Alopecia areata (AA), an autoimmune condition causing non-scarring hair loss, often coexists with atopic dermatitis (AD) due to shared T-helper cell type 2 (Th2)-mediated pathways. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, is a cornerstone treatment for AD but has conflicting reports regarding its impact on AA, with some suggesting therapeutic benefits and others indicating AA induction. Methods: This retrospective study, utilizing the TriNetX Research Network’s de-identified data from over 300 million patient records, investigates the association between dupilumab use and AA risk in AD patients. Results: After propensity score matching, 23,782 dupilumab users were compared with an equal number of controls. Results revealed a statistically significant increased AA risk in dupilumab users (odds ratio: 1.436, 95% CI: 1.066–1.935, p = 0.0167) after 16 weeks. Cases occurring within 16 weeks were excluded. Conclusions: Potential mechanisms include immune rebalancing, with Th2 suppression possibly upregulating Th1/Th17 pathways or unmasking latent AA in predisposed individuals. These findings challenge dupilumab’s potential as an AA treatment and highlight the need for vigilant monitoring, including routine scalp examinations and patient education. Future research should focus on mechanistic pathways, risk stratification, and comparative studies with other biologics to optimize personalized treatment strategies for AD and AA.

Background/Objectives: Demand for dermatologic services exceeds specialist capacity, with average wait times of 26–50 days in the United States. Current triage methods rely on subjective judgment or disease-specific indices that do not generalize across diagnoses or translate to operational decisions. We developed and validated the Dermatologic Complexity Score (DCS), a standardized instrument to guide case prioritization across dermatology care settings and evaluate DCS as a workload-reduction filter, enabling safe delegation of approximately half of routine teledermatology cases (DCS ≤ 40) away from specialist review. Methods: We conducted a prospective validation study of the DCS using 100 consecutive teledermatology cases spanning 30 common conditions. The DCS decomposes complexity into five domains (Diagnostic, Treatment, Risk, Patient Complexity, Monitoring) summed to a 0–100 total with prespecified bands: ≤40 (low) (41–70), (moderate) (71–89), (high), ≥90 (extreme). Five board-certified dermatologists and an automated module independently scored all cases. Two primary care physicians completed all ≤40 cases to assess feasibility. Primary outcomes were interrater reliability using ICC (2,1) and agreement with automation. Secondary outcomes included time-to-decision, referral rates, and primary care feasibility. Results: Mean patient age was 46.2 years; 47% of cases scored ≤40, 33% scored 41–70, 18% scored 71–89, and 2% scored ≥90. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC (1,2)) = 0.979; 95% CI 0.974–0.983), with near-perfect agreement between automated and mean dermatologist scores (r = 0.998). Time-to-decision increased monotonically across DCS bands from 2.11 min (≤40) to 5 (90) min (≥90) (p = 1.36 × 10⁻¹⁴). Referral rates were 0% for ≤40, 3% for 41–70, 27.8% for 71–89, and 100% for ≥90 cases. DCS strongly predicted referral decisions (AUC = 0.919). Primary care physicians successfully managed all ≤40 cases but required 6–8 additional minutes per case compared to dermatologists. Conclusions: The DCS demonstrates excellent reliability and strong construct validity, mapping systematically to clinically relevant outcomes, including decision time and referral patterns. The instrument enables standardized, reproducible triage decisions that can optimize resource allocation across teledermatology, clinic, procedural, and inpatient settings. Implementation could improve access to dermatologic care by supporting appropriate delegation of low-complexity cases to primary care while ensuring timely specialist evaluation for high-complexity conditions.

Translation: The University of Toledo Journal of Medical Sciences is the online journal launched by the University of Toledo. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they report original work and are not under consideration for publication by any other journal. The journal publishes original articles reporting experimental results of basic or clinical research, case reports, and reviews. The journal uses a single blind peer review system and each manuscript, based on the results presented in its original submission, will be evaluated by two student reviewers and one faculty reviewer. This process will provide an opportunity for medical students, graduate students, residents, fellows and faculty to publish research observation in a timely manner.

Translation: The University of Toledo Journal of Medical Sciences is the online journal launched by the University of Toledo. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they report original work and are not under consideration for publication by any other journal. The journal publishes original articles reporting experimental results of basic or clinical research, case reports, and reviews. The journal uses a single blind peer review system and each manuscript, based on the results presented in its original submission, will be evaluated by two student reviewers and one faculty reviewer. This process will provide an opportunity for medical students, graduate students, residents, fellows and faculty to publish research observation in a timely manner.

Skin aging is a complex, multifactorial process influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, which determine the rate of skin aging through signs such as lines, wrinkles, and discoloration. The objective of this literature review is to explore the efficacy of certain anti-aging treatments that have been developed to protect the skin from intrinsic and extrinsic aging factors. This literature review utilized the online publication resource PubMed. Search criteria included “anti-aging” and “skin treatment” with “lotions” or “derma rolling” or “botulinum toxin” or “Red Light Therapy,” including research published from 2014 to the present day. The techniques that this search elucidated were: red light therapy (RLT), topical lotions with vitamin A or Vitamin E and C derivatives, botulinum toxin therapies (BTT), and dermarolling. Review of these treatments showed generally positive efficacy with RLT, BTT, and topical lotions, which were proven advantageous with high patient satisfaction. However, dermarolling yielded few studies with significant control groups, putting its efficacy and clinical relevance in question and exhibiting the necessity for further research to be conducted before considering it as a potential treatment.2 Similarly, limited research exists on the side effect profiles and long-term efficacy of RLT, topical lotions with vitamin A or Vitamin E and C derivatives, and BTT, highlighting the need for further longitudinal studies. Treatment options should additionally be decided on an individualized basis that considers patient goals, treatment adherence, and past medical history. A patient-centered focus will provide optimal treatment courses and minimize potential adverse reactions.