Jeremy Hess

Dr. Jeremy Hess

Center for Health and the Global Environment (CHanGE), University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
HVHolly Vins
Holly Vins
JBJesse Bell
Jesse Bell
SSShubhayu Saha
Shubhayu Saha
Jeremy HessJeremy Hess
Jeremy Hess
Little is understood about the long term, indirect health consequences of drought (a period of abnormally dry weather). In particular, the implications of drought for mental health via pathways such as loss of livelihood, diminished social support, and rupture of place bonds have not been extensively studied, leaving a knowledge gap for practitioners and researchers alike. A systematic review of literature was performed to examine the mental health effects of drought. The systematic review results were synthesized to create a causal process diagram that illustrates the pathways linking drought effects to mental health outcomes. Eighty-two articles using a variety of methods in different contexts were gathered from the systematic review. The pathways in the causal process diagram with greatest support in the literature are those focusing on the economic and migratory effects of drought. The diagram highlights the complexity of the relationships between drought and mental health, including the multiple ways that factors can interact and lead to various outcomes. The systematic review and resulting causal process diagram can be used in both practice and theory, including prevention planning, public health programming, vulnerability and risk assessment, and research question guidance. The use of a causal process diagram provides a much needed avenue for integrating the findings of diverse research to further the understanding of the mental health implications of drought.

13 October 2022 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSCecilia Sorensen
Cecilia Sorensen
Jeremy HessJeremy Hess
Jeremy Hess
This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem. Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented, followed by a review of formal guidelines, when they exist. The article ends with the authors’ clinical recommendations.

KKKim Knowlton
Kim Knowlton
SKSuhas P. Kulkarni
Suhas P. Kulkarni
GAGulrez Azhar
Gulrez Azhar
DMDileep Mavalankar
Dileep Mavalankar
AJAnjali Jaiswal
Anjali Jaiswal
TGThe Ahmedabad Heat and Climate Study Group
The Ahmedabad Heat and Climate Study Group
Recurrent heat waves, already a concern in rapidly growing and urbanizing South Asia, will very likely worsen in a warming world. Coordinated adaptation efforts can reduce heat’s adverse health impacts, however. To address this concern in Ahmedabad (Gujarat, India), a coalition has been formed to develop an evidence-based heat preparedness plan and early warning system. This paper describes the group and initial steps in the plan’s development and implementation. Evidence accumulation included extensive literature review, analysis of local temperature and mortality data, surveys with heat-vulnerable populations, focus groups with health care professionals, and expert consultation. The findings and recommendations were encapsulated in policy briefs for key government agencies, health care professionals, outdoor workers, and slum communities, and synthesized in the heat preparedness plan. A 7-day probabilistic weather forecast was also developed and is used to trigger the plan in advance of dangerous heat waves. The pilot plan was implemented in 2013, and public outreach was done through training workshops, hoardings/billboards, pamphlets, and print advertisements. Evaluation activities and continuous improvement efforts are ongoing, along with plans to explore the program’s scalability to other Indian cities, as Ahmedabad is the first South Asian city to address heat-health threats comprehensively.

1 February 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jeremy HessJeremy Hess
Jeremy Hess
JMJulia Z. McDowell
Julia Z. McDowell
GLGeorge Luber
George Luber
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

1 November 2014 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jeremy HessJeremy Hess
Jeremy Hess
SSShubhayu Saha
Shubhayu Saha
GLGeorge Luber
George Luber
Background: Patients with acute heat illness present primarily to emergency departments (EDs), yet little is known regarding these visits. Objective: We aimed to describe acute heat illness visits to U.S. EDs from 2006 through 2010 and identify factors associated with hospital admission or with death in the ED. Methods: We extracted ED case-level data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for 2006–2010, defining cases as ED visits from May through September with any heat illness diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 992.0–992.9). We correlated visit rates and temperature anomalies, analyzed demographics and ED disposition, identified risk factors for adverse outcomes, and examined ED case fatality rates (CFR). Results: There were 326,497 (95% CI: 308,372, 344,658) cases, with 287,875 (88.2%) treated and released, 38,392 (11.8%) admitted, and 230 (0.07%) died in the ED. Heat illness diagnoses were first-listed in 68%. 74.7% had heat exhaustion, 5.4% heat stroke. Visit rates were highly correlated with annual temperature anomalies (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.882, p = 0.005). Treat-and-release rates were highest for younger adults (26.2/100,000/year), whereas hospitalization and death-in-the-ED rates were highest for older adults (6.7 and 0.03/100,000/year, respectively); all rates were highest in rural areas. Heat stroke had an ED CFR of 99.4/10,000 (95% CI: 78.7, 120.1) visits and was diagnosed in 77.0% of deaths. Adjusted odds of hospital admission or death in the ED were higher among elders, males, urban and low-income residents, and those with chronic conditions. Conclusions: Heat illness presented to the ED frequently, with highest rates in rural areas. Case definitions should include all diagnoses. Visit rates were correlated with temperature anomalies. Heat stroke had a high ED CFR. Males, elders, and the chronically ill were at greatest risk of admission or death in the ED. Chronic disease burden exponentially increased this risk. Citation: Hess JJ, Saha S, Luber G. 2014. Summertime acute heat illness in U.S. emergency departments from 2006 through 2010: analysis of a nationally representative sample. Environ Health Perspect 122:1209–1215; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306796

3 April 2023 in Annual Review of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jeremy HessJeremy Hess
Jeremy Hess
NENicole A. Errett
Nicole A. Errett
GMGlenn McGregor
Glenn McGregor
TITania Busch Isaksen
Tania Busch Isaksen
ZWZachary S. Wettstein
Zachary S. Wettstein
KEKristie L. Ebi
Kristie L. Ebi
Heat is a dangerous hazard that causes acute heat illness, chronic disease exacerbations, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and a range of injuries. Risks are highest during extreme heat events (EHEs), which challenge the capacity of health systems and other critical infrastructure. EHEs are becoming more frequent and severe, and climate change is driving an increasing proportion of heat-related mortality, necessitating more investment in health protection. Climate-resilient health systems are better positioned for EHEs, and EHE preparedness is a form of disaster risk reduction. Preparedness activities commonly take the form of heat action plans (HAPs), with many examples at various administrative scales. HAP activities can be divided into primary prevention, most important in the pre-event phase; secondary prevention, key to risk reduction early in an EHE;and tertiary prevention, important later in the event phase. After-action reports and other postevent evaluation activities are central to adaptive management of this climate-sensitive hazard.