Aim: This study investigates the expression of aberrant salience (AS) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), those at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR‐P) and help‐seeking individuals without formal diagnoses. Methods: Ninety‐nine participants, 44 males and 55 females (age range 17–39 years), met the inclusion criteria of absence of major neurological disorders, intellectual disabilities or substance‐related conditions. None were receiving antipsychotic treatment. Based on clinical evaluations, participants were categorised into three groups: ASD ( n = 23), Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS) ( n = 27) and help‐seekers ( n = 49). The Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) was administered. Results: Significant differences were observed in ASI total and subscale scores among groups. Post hoc analyses showed significantly higher ASI scores in the ASD and APS groups compared to help‐seekers, but no significant differences between ASD and APS. Conclusions: These findings suggest an overlap in AS processing between ASD and psychosis‐spectrum conditions, supporting AS as a transdiagnostic construct.

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex and heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition. Diagnosing ASD in adults, especially in milder forms, remains challenging due to camouflaging strategies, adaptive behaviors, and frequent psychiatric comorbidities. Despite increased awareness, there is a critical need to improve recognition and tailored interventions for adults with ASD. This study aims to examine the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among individuals diagnosed with ASD. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study examined 64 adults diagnosed with ASD (n = 29 females, 45.3%; age: range, 18–57 years; mean ± SD, 30.9 ± 8.92), who accessed two university hospital outpatient units in Rome between September 2023 and January 2025. All participants were assessed using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition–Module 4 (ADOS-2). Psychiatric comorbidities were evaluated using clinical assessments and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) Plus. Results: All patients received an ASD diagnosis without intellectual disability. Forty-four (68.8%) presented with at least one psychiatric comorbidity, most commonly depressive (25.0%) and anxiety disorders (9.4%). Over half of the participants (57.4%) reported at least mild depressive symptoms, and 42.6% exhibited moderate to severe depressive levels. Conclusions: High rates of psychiatric comorbidities, particularly mood and anxiety disorders, were observed, underscoring the importance of comprehensive, multidisciplinary assessment and individualized interventions. Further research using larger samples and rigorous methodologies is warranted to better characterize the ASD phenotype in adults and guide targeted therapeutic strategies.

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a debilitating disorder with substantial societal and economic impacts. The clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P) state generally precedes the onset of SCZ, offering a window for early intervention. However, treatment guidelines for CHR-P individuals remain contentious, particularly regarding antipsychotic (AP) medications. Although several studies have examined the effects of APs on reducing the risk of conversion to psychosis, the novelty of this narrative review lies in its focus on differentiating APs’ effects on positive and negative symptoms, as well as cognitive functioning, in CHR-P individuals. Evidence suggests that APs may be cautiously recommended for attenuated positive symptoms to stabilize individuals for psychological interventions, but their use in treating negative symptoms is generally discouraged due to limited efficacy and potential side effects. Similarly, the effects of APs on cognitive abilities remain underexplored, with results indicating a lack of significant neurocognitive outcomes. In conclusion, APs’ use in CHR-P patients requires careful consideration due to limited evidence and potential adverse effects. Future research should focus on individual symptom domains and treatment modalities to optimize outcomes in this critical population. Until then, a cautious approach emphasizing non-pharmacological interventions is advisable.

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex and heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition. Diagnosing ASD in adults, especially in milder forms, remains challenging due to camouflaging strategies, adaptive behaviors, and frequent psychiatric comorbidities. Despite increased awareness, there is a critical need to improve recognition and tailored interventions for adults with ASD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 64 adults diagnosed with ASD at two university hospital outpatient units in Rome. All participants were assessed using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2). Psychiatric comorbidities were evaluated using clinical assessments and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) Plus. Results: The sample included 45.3% females, with a mean age of 30.9 years. All patients had Level 1 ASD without intellectual disability. Overall, 68.8% presented with at least one psychiatric comorbidity, most commonly depressive (25.0%) and anxiety disorders (9.4%). Over half of the participants (57.4%) reported at least mild depressive symptoms, and 42.6% exhibited moderate to severe levels. Conclusions: High rates of psychiatric comorbidities, particularly mood and anxiety disorders, were observed underscoring the importance of comprehensive, multidisciplinary assessment and individualized interventions. Further research using larger samples and rigorous methodologies is warranted to better characterize the ASD phenotype in adults and guide targeted therapeutic strategies.

Background and Objectives: Psychological resilience is increasingly recognized as a determinant of how patients respond to surgical stress, yet its role in perioperative medicine remains poorly defined. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on resilience in surgical populations from a psychobiological perspective, spanning conceptual models, measurement approaches, clinical correlates, biological mechanisms, and intervention strategies. Materials and Methods: This narrative review was conducted to examine psychological resilience in adult surgical populations from an integrated psychobiological and perioperative perspective. A structured literature search was performed in December 2026 using PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo, combining resilience-related constructs with surgical, perioperative, biological, and clinical outcome keywords. Eligible publications included observational, longitudinal, interventional, translational, and conceptually relevant studies addressing resilience in adult surgical settings. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively across predefined domains, including conceptualization and measurement of resilience, associations with perioperative outcomes, neuroendocrine and inflammatory mechanisms, and resilience-modulating interventions within perioperative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) frameworks. Results: Contemporary models conceptualize resilience as a dynamic, context-dependent process supported by interacting psychological, biological, and social factors. In surgical cohorts, higher resilience is consistently associated with better patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, pain control, and emotional adjustment, and in some studies with survival and functional recovery. Preoperative depression, anxiety, maladaptive coping, and low social support converge as components of a broader “resilience profile” linked to poorer postoperative trajectories. Biologically, resilient phenotypes are characterized by more regulated hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and autonomic responses and reduced inflammatory activation. Psychological therapies, prehabilitation programs, and selected pharmacological strategies show convergent, though heterogeneous, signals of benefit and can be interpreted as indirect resilience-enhancing interventions. Conclusions: Resilience appears to be a clinically meaningful, potentially modifiable construct that links psychosocial functioning, biological vulnerability, and postoperative outcomes. Incorporating resilience assessment into preoperative risk stratification and systematically embedding resilience-building strategies within perioperative and ERAS pathways may support more personalized, psychologically informed surgical care. Prospective, multidomain studies are needed to validate measurement tools, clarify mechanisms, and test resilience-targeted interventions in surgical populations.