Liver diseases are the major predisposing conditions for the development of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty. Recently, the mechanism of the onset of these complications has been better established. Regardless of the etiology of the underlying liver disease, the clinical manifestations are common. The main consequences are impaired dietary intake, altered macro- and micronutrient metabolism, energy metabolism disturbances, an increase in energy expenditure, nutrient malabsorption, sarcopenia, frailty, and osteopathy. These complications have direct effects on clinical outcomes, survival, and quality of life. The nutritional status should be assessed systematically and periodically during follow-up in these patients. Maintaining and preserving an adequate nutritional status is crucial and should be a mainstay of treatment. Although general nutritional interventions have been established, special considerations are needed in specific settings such as decompensated cirrhosis, alcohol-related liver disease, and metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. In this review, we summarize the physiopathology and factors that impact the nutritional status of liver disease. We review how to assess malnutrition and sarcopenia and how to prevent and manage these complications in this setting.

Metabolic-associated steatohepatitis liver disease (MASLD) currently impacts a quarter of the global population, and its incidence is expected to increase in the future. As a result, hepatocellular carcinoma associated with MASLD is also on the rise. Notably, this carcinoma does not always develop alongside liver cirrhosis, often leading to a more advanced stage at diagnosis. The challenge lies in accurately identifying patients who are at a higher risk to tailor screening processes effectively. Additionally, several therapeutic approaches are being explored to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma, although there are no universally accepted guidelines yet.

Obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are two chronic conditions whose prevalence continues to rise globally. Emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional interplay between them, mediated by shared pathophysiological pathways. This narrative review explores the mechanisms Ilinking obesity to IBD development and progression, focusing on the role of adipose tissue dysfunction. Both diseases exhibit intestinal dysbiosis, low-grade systemic inflammation, and impaired epithelial barrier integrity, contributing to immune activation. Visceral adiposity, particularly mesenteric fat, acts as an immunometabolic organ producing cytokines and adipokines that may exacerbate intestinal inflammation. In Crohn’s disease, mesenteric fat expansion, or “creeping fat”, is associated with transmural inflammation, fibrosis, and luminal narrowing. Epidemiological data on obesity as a risk factor for IBD remain inconsistent due to methodological heterogeneity and confounders. Similarly, the impact of obesity on IBD outcomes, including disease activity, phenotype, and the need for surgery, is debated. While mesenteric surgical approaches like Kono-S anastomosis showed initial promise in reducing recurrence, recent randomized trials offer conflicting results. Finally, metabolic drugs such as statins, metformin, and GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties with potential utility in IBD management. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical significance of obesity and metabolic dysfunction in IBD and evaluate targeted therapeutic strategies.

Metabolic Associated Steatohepatitis Liver Disease (MASLD) currently impacts a quarter of the global population and its prevalence is expected to increase in the future. As a result, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with MASLD is also on the rise. Notably, hepatocellular carcinoma in this group does not always develop alongside liver cirrhosis, often leading to a more advanced stage at diagnosis. The challenge lies in accurately identifying patients who are at a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma to tailor screening processes effectively. Additionally, several therapeutic approaches are being explored to prevent hepatocellular carcinoma, although there are yet no universally accepted guidelines

Background: There are conflicting studies reporting both an increase and a decrease in vitamin B12 (VB12) levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this study, we aimed to dissect the effects of steatosis and fibrosis on VB12. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study including all patients with a vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) performed at the Hospital Miguel Servet (Zaragoza, Spain) between 2019 and 2022 for a chronic liver disease and having a recent blood test for VB12 levels. Liver fibrosis was assessed by VCTE and hepatic steatosis by ultrasonography and/or through controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Results: 1195 patients (NAFLD n = 441, other chronic liver disease n = 754) were included. Median age was 57 years, 53% female. Patients with NAFLD had lower levels of VB12 compared to the rest of chronic liver diseases (289 vs. 313 pg/mL, p < 0.001). A significant negative correlation was observed between VB12 levels and hepatic steatosis measured by CAP (r = −0.13, p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between VB12 levels and liver stiffness in patients with NAFLD in both sexes (men r = 0.31, p < 0.001 and women r = 0.15, p = 0.016). A significant association between VB12 levels and liver fibrosis in cirrhosis stage was observed in patients with NAFLD (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.025–1.098, p = 0.001). Conclusion: VB12 levels were lower with greater hepatic steatosis. In NAFLD, VB12 levels were lower compared to other chronic liver diseases but their levels increased with higher liver stiffness and in cirrhosis stage.