Kuo-Piao Chung

Kuo-Piao Chung


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2011 in Annals of Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBahar Bassiri Md Gharb
Bahar Bassiri Md Gharb
ARAntonio Md Rampazzo
Antonio Md Rampazzo
SSStefano Spanio di Spilimbergo
Stefano Spanio di Spilimbergo
EXEnny-Sonia Xu
Enny-Sonia Xu
KCKuo-Piao Chung
Kuo-Piao Chung
HCHung-Chi Chen
Hung-Chi Chen
Background: Maintenance of the blood supply to the lymph nodes is necessary for survival and function. We report the outcome of vascularized lymph node transfer with hilar perforators compared with the conventional technique. Patients: A total of 21 patients affected by early stage II upper limb lymphedema were included in this study. Of them, 11 patients received a free groin flap containing lymph nodes, and 10 patients received vascularized inguinal lymph nodes with hilar perforators. Mean follow-up was 46 and 40 months, respectively. Complications, secondary procedures, circumference of the limb, and subjective symptomatology were registered. The differences were evaluated statistically. Results: The limb circumferences decreased significantly in the new group. The number of secondary procedures was significantly higher in the standard group. There were 2 cases of partial flap loss and donor site lymphorrhea in the standard group. In both the groups, visual analog scale scores improved after the operation. Conclusions: Transfer of vascularized inguinal lymph nodes based on the hilar perforators improves the outcomes in the treatment of early lymphedema of the upper extremity.


21 April 2010 in World Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChin‐Ta Lin
Chin‐Ta Lin
KHKuo-Feng Hsu
Kuo-Feng Hsu
TCTeng‐Wei Chen
Teng‐Wei Chen
JYJyh‐Cherng Yu
Jyh‐Cherng Yu
DCDe‐Chuan Chan
De‐Chuan Chan
CHChung‐Bao Hsieh
Chung‐Bao Hsieh

15 July 2015 in Microsurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPedro Ciudad
Pedro Ciudad
Michele MarucciaMichele Maruccia
Michele Maruccia
JSJuan Socas
Juan Socas
MLMing‐Hsien Lee
Ming‐Hsien Lee
KCKuo-Piao Chung
Kuo-Piao Chung
HCHung-Chi Chen
Hung-Chi Chen

1 September 2015 in Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLi-Ju Chen
Li-Ju Chen
KCKuo-Piao Chung
Kuo-Piao Chung
YCYao-Jen Chang
Yao-Jen Chang
YCYun-Jau Chang
Yun-Jau Chang

23 August 2016 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCY J Chang
Y J Chang
KCKuo-Piao Chung
Kuo-Piao Chung
LCL J Chen
L J Chen
This study aimed to assess long-term survival after liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with stage I–III HCC who underwent hepatectomy from 2002 to 2010 were identified retrospectively from prospective national databases and followed until December 2012. Patients were assigned into four groups according to tumour size: less than 3·0 cm (small), 3·0–4·9 cm (medium), 5·0–10·0 cm (large) and over 10·0 cm (huge). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival analysis. A total of 11 079 patients with HCC (mean(s.d.) age 59·7 (12·0) years) were eligible for this study. Median follow-up was 72·5 months. Patients with huge HCC had the worst prognosis; overall survival rates for patients with small, medium, large and huge HCC were 72·0, 62·1, 50·8 and 35·0 per cent respectively at 5 years, and 52·6, 41·8, 35·8 and less than 20·0 per cent at 10 years (P < 0·001). Multivariable analysis showed that tumour size affected long-term survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1·31, 1·55 and 2·38 for medium, large and huge HCC respectively versus small HCC). Prognostic factors for huge HCC were surgical margin larger than 0·2 cm (HR 0·70; P = 0·025), poor differentiation (HR 1·34; P = 0·004), multiple tumours (HR 1·64; P < 0·001), vascular invasion (HR 1·52; P = 0·008), cirrhosis (HR 1·37; P = 0·013) and the use of nucleoside analogues (HR 0·69; P = 0·004). Huge HCCs have a worse prognosis than smaller HCCs after liver resection. A wide resection margin and antiviral therapy with nucleoside analogues may be associated with favourable long-term survival.