AD is the highly severe part of the dementia spectrum and impairs cognitive abilities of individuals, bringing economic, societal and psychological burdens beyond the diseased. A promising approach in AD research is the analysis of structural and functional brain connectomes, i.e., sNETs and fNETs, respectively. We propose to use tensor representation (B-tensor) of uni-modal and multi-modal brain connectomes to define a low-dimensional space via tensor factorization. We show on a cohort of 47 subjects, spanning the spectrum of dementia, that diagnosis with an accuracy of 77% to 100% is achievable in a 5D connectome space using different structural and functional connectome constructions in a uni-modal and multi-modal fashion. We further show that multi-modal tensor factorization improves the results suggesting complementary information in structure and function. A neurological assessment of the connectivity patterns identified largely agrees with prior knowledge, yet also suggests new associations that may play a role in the disease progress.
Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia (ADD) progresses along a continuum of cognitive decline, typically from Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI) to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and eventually to dementia. While many studies have focused on classifying these clinical stages, fewer have examined whether brain connectomes encode this continuum in a low-dimensional, interpretable form. Motivated by the hypothesis that structural brain connectomes undergo complex yet compact changes across cognitive decline, we propose a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based framework that embeds these connectomes into a two-dimensional manifold to capture the evolving patterns of structural connectivity associated with cognitive deterioration. Using attention-based graph aggregation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), we find that MCI subjects consistently occupy an intermediate position between SCI and ADD, and that the observed transitions align with known clinical biomarkers of ADD pathology. This hypothesis-driven analysis is further supported by the model’s robust separation performance, with ROC-AUC scores of 0.93 for ADD vs. SCI and 0.81 for ADD vs. MCI. These findings offer an interpretable and neurologically grounded representation of dementia progression, emphasizing structural connectome alterations as potential markers of cognitive decline.