Background: C4d deposits are present in a substantial proportion of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), indicating the activation of the lectin pathway (LP) of the complement system. It seems that patients with activated LP have worse renal prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of C4d in our cohort of patients with primary IgA nephropathy (pIgAN). Methods: Patients with pIgAN were recruited from a hospital register of kidney biopsies of the Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb. Additional immunohistochemistry staining for C4d was performed on paraffin-embedded kidney tissue, and patients were stratified into being C4d positive or C4d negative. The clinical and histologic features of patients were analyzed and compared regarding C4d positivity. The primary outcome was defined as kidney failure (KF), and predictor variables of KF and renal survival were analyzed. Results: Of a total of 95 patients with pIgAN included in the study, C4d was present in 43 (45.3%). C4d-positive patients had a higher value of systolic (p = 0.039) and diastolic (p = 0.006) blood pressure at diagnosis as well as higher 24 h proteinuria (p = 0.018), serum urate (p = 0.033), and lower eGFR (p < 0.001). C4d-positive patients had worse renal survival (p < 0.001), higher rates of disease progression to KF (p < 0.001), and higher proteinuria (p < 0.001) and lower eGFR (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Glomerular C4d was an independent predictor of disease progression to KF (HR = 5.87 [0.95 CI 1.06–32.44], p = 0.032). Conclusions: C4d is an independent predictor of disease progression in patients with pIgAN. C4d may be used as an additional marker of progressive disease course in IgAN. The therapeutic implications of C4d status in IgAN, particularly in terms of complement inhibitors application, are not yet known.

Background: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency associated with neuronal injury and activation of apoptotic pathways. While these mechanisms are well described in experimental models, evidence in humans is limited. This study evaluated Bcl-2 and FAS—key apoptosis-related proteins—in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with convulsive SE. Methods: Between February 2024 and January 2025, CSF and serum samples were collected from 18 adults with convulsive SE within 48 h of onset, and from 15 control subjects. Patients with acute brain injury, stroke, tumors, or central nervous system infections were excluded. Bcl-2 and FAS concentrations were quantified using ELISA. Serum samples were obtained at diagnosis (S1), 24 h (S2), and 7 days (S3). Results: CSF Bcl-2 levels were significantly higher in SE patients compared with controls (z = 4.1, p < 0.001). CSF FAS levels did not differ significantly (z = 0.07, p = 0.94). No differences in serum Bcl-2 were observed. In contrast, serum FAS concentrations were significantly elevated at all three time points in SE patients compared with controls (S1–S3; all p < 0.001). Conclusions: Convulsive SE is associated with distinct apoptotic responses in the central nervous system and periphery. Elevated CSF Bcl-2 may reflect acute neuroprotective or stress-related responses, whereas persistently increased serum FAS suggests systemic apoptotic activation. These findings highlight the potential prognostic and therapeutic relevance of apoptosis-related biomarkers in SE.

Background and Objectives: Physical activity represents a cornerstone in the management of diabetes mellitus; however, the majority of persons with diabetes remain insufficiently active. Current guidelines emphasise the need to educate individuals with diabetes on physical activity at each clinical visit. The aim of the study was to develop an adequate instrument and test diabetologists’ knowledge on physical activity and related guidelines in diabetes, as well as investigate their prescribing habits. Materials and Methods: The instrument was developed with four diabetologists using Delphi and RAND appropriateness methods, then distributed to diabetologist societies in 12 Southeast European countries for anonymous completion by their members. Data were analysed using Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson ${ x}^2$ test. Results: Out of 302 analysed respondents, 123 (41%) worked at university hospitals, at average four days a week in outpatient departments, mean number of patients was 16 a day; 95 (32%) had a PhD, and 105 (35%) university teaching positions. Median overall knowledge was 15 (Q1–Q3, 13–17) out of 22 maximum points. 26% diabetologists knew recommended level of physical activity for people with diabetes. Physical activity goals were discussed during check-ups in 53.0% of cases; re-education and goal adjustments were provided in 33.4% when health status changed; and clear instructions were documented in 25.5% of medical records. Conclusions: Diabetologists’ overall knowledge of physical activity was found to be at least satisfactory in 90% of participants. Knowledge of the guidelines is insufficient in 75% of participants. The prescribing habits are inadequate in half of the participants.