Background: Additional therapies (e.g., laser, photodynamic therapy, and ozone) have been reported to improve mechanical instrumentation and immune response in non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT). With this systematic review we evaluated the effectiveness of ozone therapy in reducing inflammation and progression of periodontal disease. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized and clinical trials on ozone therapy (gas, liquid, gel/oil) combined with NSPT. The study design followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and the risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. Results: Eight of the twenty-two studies reviewed reported on gaseous ozone, nine on ozone water, and five on ozonated oil/gel as an adjunct to mechanical periodontal instrumentation, often with scaling and root planing (SRP). Ozone was found to be more effective than SRP alone in treating inflammation, as measured with the gingival index (VMD −0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) (−0.41; −0.24); p < 0.00001) and compared to chlorhexidine (CHX) (ozone gel; VMD −0.10; 95% CI (−0.20; −0.01); p = 0.03). The study findings were inconsistent, however, with several reporting clinical and microbiological benefit while others observed no marked improvement with the addition of ozone therapy to NSPT. Conclusions: While ozone therapy may represent a useful adjunct to NSPT, further research with larger study groups is warranted to determine its effectiveness.

Fluoride prophylaxis is a cornerstone in preventing dental caries, a disease for which orthodontic patients are at high risk due to the reduced effectiveness of home oral hygiene and increased plaque accumulation. Recent evidence defines caries as polymicrobial, involving Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacilli, and emerging species such as Selenomonas sputigena. This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated professional topical fluoride in the form of gel and varnish in 68 patients aged 8–17 years wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Participants were divided into three equal groups: two intervention groups and one control group. Clinical parameters (DMFT, salivary pH, PCR%) and microbiological analyses of plaque and saliva (oral Streptococci, S. mutans, S. sputigena, Lactobacilli, total bacterial count) were assessed at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1), following professional hygiene and fluoride application for the intervention groups. At T1, salivary pH increased in the gel group, and PCR% decreased significantly in all groups, with the most pronounced decrease observed in the varnish group. PCR analysis showed a higher rate of S. mutans and S. sputigena negativization in intervention groups. Culture-based analyses revealed reductions in oral Streptococci and Lactobacilli in intervention groups, while levels increased in controls. Overall, both clinical and microbiological variables indicated improvements in the fluoride-treated groups compared to controls, highlighting the efficacy of professional fluoride prophylaxis in orthodontic patients.

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of adjunctive gaseous ozone therapy combined with full-mouth ultrasonic debridement and scaling and root planing (FMUD–SRP) in patients with generalized periodontitis. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with stage II–IV generalized periodontitis were enrolled in a randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Quadrants were assigned to receive FMUD–SRP alone or FMUD–SRP plus adjunctive gaseous ozone therapy. Ozone (2100 ppm, 80% oxygen) was applied subgingivally immediately after instrumentation during three treatment sessions. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 45, and 90 days. Subgingival plaque samples were analyzed using qualitative polymerase chain reaction to detect six periodontal pathogens. Results: Both treatments resulted in significant clinical improvements over time (p < 0.05). At 90 days, ozone-treated sites showed greater probing pocket depth reduction (−1.6 ± 0.8 mm vs. −1.2 ± 0.8 mm; p = 0.02) and clinical attachment level gain (−1.1 ± 1.0 mm vs. −0.6 ± 1.0 mm; p = 0.03) compared with control sites. No significant intergroup differences were observed for bleeding on probing, plaque index, or gingival recession. A significantly greater reduction in the detection frequency of periodontal pathogens was observed in the ozone group, including complete suppression of Treponema denticola and marked reductions in other anaerobic species. Conclusions: Adjunctive gaseous ozone therapy enhances the clinical outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatment and exerts a selective antimicrobial effect against anaerobic periodontal pathogens.

Fixed orthodontics presents significant challenges in maintaining proper at-home oral hygiene. The presence of irregular surfaces, which favor bacterial accumulation, makes it difficult to control plaque effectively, thereby increasing the risk of developing various oral diseases. In this context, education and motivation are crucial for improving at-home oral hygiene in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatments. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of education and motivation on the plaque index of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. A search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). They had to assess treatment with fixed and home oral hygiene protocols. The p-value was analyzed by comparing the experimental and control groups, as well as the Plaque Index (PI) of the two groups at each follow-up. After a careful selection process, nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the review. The results from these studies show that repeated educational and motivational strategies, delivered through both traditional and digital methods, lead to a reduction in the plaque index among patients who received support compared to control groups. In fact, six out of nine studies show a statistically significant difference in terms of PI for the experimental group. This systematic review highlights the importance of educational and motivational interventions in helping patients maintain effective plaque control, a crucial aspect of oral health for individuals wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Digital tools offer a promising avenue for enhancing adherence among orthodontic patients and reducing the risk of plaque-related conditions.