Sunil Singhal

Dr. Sunil Singhal

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2021 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FVFilippo Veglia
Filippo Veglia
AHAyumi Hashimoto
Ayumi Hashimoto
HDHarsh Dweep
Harsh Dweep
ESEmilio Sanseviero
Emilio Sanseviero
ALAlessandra De Leo
Alessandra De Leo
DGDmitry Gabrilovich
Dmitry Gabrilovich
In this study, using single-cell RNA-seq, cell mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, and functional analysis, we characterized the heterogeneity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in cancer. We describe three populations of PMNs in tumor-bearing mice: classical PMNs, polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs), and activated PMN-MDSCs with potent immune suppressive activity. In spleens of mice, PMN-MDSCs gradually replaced PMNs during tumor progression. Activated PMN-MDSCs were found only in tumors, where they were present at the very early stages of the disease. These populations of PMNs in mice could be separated based on the expression of CD14. In peripheral blood of cancer patients, we identified two distinct populations of PMNs with characteristics of classical PMNs and PMN-MDSCs. The gene signature of tumor PMN-MDSCs was similar to that in mouse activated PMN-MDSCs and was closely associated with negative clinical outcome in cancer patients. Thus, we provide evidence that PMN-MDSCs are a distinct population of PMNs with unique features and potential for selective targeting opportunities.

13 February 2019 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSunil Singhal
Sunil Singhal
JSJason Stadanlick
Jason Stadanlick
MAMichael J. Annunziata
Michael J. Annunziata
ARAbhishek S. Rao
Abhishek S. Rao
PBPratik S. Bhojnagarwala
Pratik S. Bhojnagarwala
EEEvgeniy B. Eruslanov
Evgeniy B. Eruslanov
PD-L1 + tumor cells, but not macrophages, are likely responsible for inhibiting tumor-specific T cells in early-stage human lung tumors.

27 December 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJarrod Predina
Jarrod Predina
EEEvgeniy Eruslanov
Evgeniy Eruslanov
BJBrendan Judy
Brendan Judy
VKVeena Kapoor
Veena Kapoor
GCGuanjun Cheng
Guanjun Cheng
SSSunil Singhal
Sunil Singhal
Each year, more than 700,000 people undergo cancer surgery in the United States. However, more than 40% of those patients develop recurrences and have a poor outcome. Traditionally, the medical community has assumed that recurrent tumors arise from selected tumor clones that are refractory to therapy. However, we found that tumor cells have few phenotypical differences after surgery. Thus, we propose an alternative explanation for the resistance of recurrent tumors. Surgery promotes inhibitory factors that allow lingering immunosuppressive cells to repopulate small pockets of residual disease quickly. Recurrent tumors and draining lymph nodes are infiltrated with M2 (CD11b + F4/80 hi CD206 hi and CD11b + F4/80 hi CD124 hi ) macrophages and CD4 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells. This complex network of immunosuppression in the surrounding tumor microenvironment explains the resistance of tumor recurrences to conventional cancer vaccines despite small tumor size, an intact antitumor immune response, and unaltered cancer cells. Therapeutic strategies coupling antitumor agents with inhibition of immunosuppressive cells potentially could impact the outcomes of more than 250,000 people each year.

1 October 2014 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OOOlugbenga Okusanya
Olugbenga Okusanya
DHDavid Holt
David Holt
DHDaniel Heitjan
Daniel Heitjan
CDCharuhas Deshpande
Charuhas Deshpande
OVOllin Venegas
Ollin Venegas
SSSunil Singhal
Sunil Singhal

1 February 2010 in Annual Review of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSunil Singhal
Sunil Singhal
SNShuming Nie
Shuming Nie
MWMay D. Wang
May D. Wang
Surgery is currently the most effective and widely used procedure in treating human cancers, and the single most important predictor of patient survival is a complete surgical resection. Major opportunities exist to develop new and innovative technologies that could help the surgeon to delineate tumor margins, to identify residual tumor cells and micrometastases, and to determine if the tumor has been completely removed. Here we discuss recent advances in nanotechnology and optical instrumentation, and how these advances can be integrated for applications in surgical oncology. A fundamental rationale is that nanometer-sized particles such as quantum dots and colloidal gold have functional and structural properties that are not available from either discrete molecules or bulk materials. When conjugated with targeting ligands such as monoclonal antibodies, peptides, or small molecules, these nanoparticles can be used to target malignant tumor cells and tumor microenvironments with high specificity and affinity. In the “mesoscopic” size range of 10–100 nm, nanoparticles also have large surface areas for conjugating to multiple diagnostic and therapeutic agents, opening new possibilities in integrated cancer imaging and therapy.

1 September 2013 in Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFDavid Fedor
David Fedor
WJW. Rainey Johnson
W. Rainey Johnson
SSSunil Singhal
Sunil Singhal