Laura Hänninen

Laura Hänninen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTCassandra Tucker
Cassandra Tucker
MJMargit Bak Jensen
Margit Bak Jensen
APAnne Marie de Passillé
Anne Marie de Passillé
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen
JRJeffrey Rushen
Jeffrey Rushen
Adequate time lying down is often considered an important aspect of dairy cow welfare. We examine what is known about cows' motivation to lie down and the consequences for health and other indicators of biological function when this behavior is thwarted. We review the environmental and animal-based factors that affect lying time in the context of animal welfare. Our objective is to review the research into the time that dairy cows spend lying down and to critically examine the evidence for the link with animal welfare. Cows can be highly motivated to lie down. They show rebound lying behavior after periods of forced standing and will sacrifice other activities, such as feeding, to lie down for an adequate amount of time. They will work, by pushing levers or weighted gates, to lie down and show possible indicators of frustration when lying behavior is thwarted. Some evidence suggests that risk of lameness is increased in environments that provide unfavorable conditions for cows to lie down and where cows are forced to stand. Lameness itself can result in longer lying times, whereas mastitis reduces it. Cow-based factors such as reproductive status, age, and milk production influence lying time, but the welfare implications of these differences are unknown. Lower lying times are reported in pasture-based systems, dry lots, and bedded packs (9 h/d) compared with tiestalls and freestalls (10 to 12 h/d) in cross-farm research. Unfavorable conditions, including too few lying stalls for the number of cows, hard or wet lying surfaces, inadequate bedding, stalls that are too small or poorly designed, heat, and rain all reduce lying time. Time constraints, such as feeding or milking, can influence lying time. However, more information is needed about the implications of mediating factors such as the effect of the standing surface (concrete, pasture, or other surfaces) and cow behavior while standing (e.g., being restrained, walking, grazing) to understand the effect of low lying times on animal welfare. Many factors contribute to the difficulty of finding a valid threshold for daily lying time to use in the assessment of animal welfare. Although higher lying times often correspond with cow comfort, and lower lying times are seen in unfavorable conditions, exceptions occur, namely when cows lie down for longer because of disease or when they spend more time standing because of estrus or parturition, or to engage in other behaviors. In conclusion, lying behavior is important to dairy cattle, but caution and a full understanding of the context and the character of the animals in question is needed before drawing firm conclusions about animal welfare from measures of lying time.

1 May 2009 in Behavior Research Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen
MPMatti Pastell
Matti Pastell

1 July 2011 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJutta Siivonen
Jutta Siivonen
STSuvi Taponen
Suvi Taponen
MHMari Hovinen
Mari Hovinen
MPMatti Pastell
Matti Pastell
BLB. Joop Lensink
B. Joop Lensink
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen

1 December 2008 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHM. Hovinen
M. Hovinen
JSJ. Siivonen
J. Siivonen
STSuvi Taponen
Suvi Taponen
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen
MPMatti Pastell
Matti Pastell
SPS. Pyörälä
S. Pyörälä
Increasing dairy farm size and increase in automation in livestock production require that new methods are used to monitor animal health. In this study, a thermal camera was tested for its capacity to detect clinical mastitis. Mastitis was experimentally induced in 6 cows with 10 microg of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The LPS was infused into the left forequarter of each cow, and the right forequarters served as controls. Clinical examination for systemic and local signs and sampling for indicators of inflammation in milk were carried out before morning and evening milking throughout the 5-d experimental period and more frequently on the challenge day. Thermal images of experimental and control quarters were taken at each sampling time from lateral and medial angles. The first signs of clinical mastitis were noted in all cows 2 h postchallenge and included changes in general appearance of the cows and local clinical signs in the affected udder quarter. Rectal temperature, milk somatic cell count, and electrical conductivity were increased 4 h postchallenge and milk N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity 8 h postchallenge. The thermal camera was successful in detecting the 1 to 1.5 degrees C temperature change on udder skin associated with clinical mastitis in all cows because temperature of the udder skin of the experimental and control quarters increased in line with the rectal temperature. Yet, local signs on the udder were seen before the rise in udder skin and body temperature. The udder represents a sensitive site for detection of any febrile disease using a noninvasive method. A thermal camera mounted in a milking or feeding parlor could detect temperature changes associated with clinical mastitis or other diseases in a dairy herd.

1 December 2009 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMatti Pastell
Matti Pastell
JTJ. Tiusanen
J. Tiusanen
MHM. Hakojärvi
M. Hakojärvi
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen

23 August 2011 in Animal Cognition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSanni Somppi
Sanni Somppi
HTHeini Törnqvist
Heini Törnqvist
LHLaura Hänninen
Laura Hänninen
CKChristina Krause
Christina Krause
OVOuti Vainio
Outi Vainio