Zhenhuang Wu

Zhenhuang Wu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZhen Li
Zhen Li
WSW.G. Sun
W.G. Sun
GWG. Wang
G. Wang
ZWZhenhuang Wu
Zhenhuang Wu

1 December 2023 in Underground Space
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJie He
Jie He
MYMei Yin
Mei Yin
XWXiangyang Wei
Xiangyang Wei
ZWZhenhuang Wu
Zhenhuang Wu

20 August 2025 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZWZhenhuang Wu
Zhenhuang Wu
YRYi Rui
Yi Rui
XLXiaojun Li
Xiaojun Li
YZYueyue Zhu
Yueyue Zhu
PLPengcheng Liu
Pengcheng Liu
MYMei Yin
Mei Yin

31 July 2025 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMei Yin
Mei Yin
Pengcheng LiuPengcheng Liu
Pengcheng Liu
ZWZhenhuang Wu
Zhenhuang Wu
Both ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) and energy underground structures are engineered systems that utilize shallow geothermal energy. However, due to the construction complexity and associated costs of energy tunnels, their heat exchange efficiency relative to GSHPs remains a topic worthy of in-depth investigation. In this study, a thermal–hydraulic (TH) coupled finite element model was developed based on a section of the Torino Metro Line in Italy to analyze the differences in and influencing factors of heat transfer performance between energy tunnels and GSHPs. The model was validated by comparing the outlet temperature curves under both winter and summer loading conditions. Based on this validated model, a parametric analysis was conducted to examine the effects of the tunnel air velocity, heat carrier fluid velocity, and fluid type. The results indicate that, under identical environmental conditions, energy tunnels exhibit higher heat exchange efficiency than conventional GSHP systems and are less sensitive to external factors such as fluid velocity. Furthermore, a comparison of different heat carrier fluids, including alcohol-based fluids, refrigerants, and water, revealed that the fluid type significantly affects thermal performance, with the refrigerant R-134a outperforming ethylene glycol and water in both heating and cooling efficiency.