Gastrointestinal manifestations in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are extremely common and have recently become a research focus. Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is poorly understood in the CF population, despite many speculations including the role of luminal pH, bacterial overgrowth, and abnormal microbiome. Nevertheless, dysmotility is emerging as a possible key player in CF intestinal symptoms. Our review article aims to explore the sequelae of defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) genes on the GI tract as studied in both animals and humans, describe various presentations of intestinal dysmotility in CF, review newer diagnostic motility techniques including intraluminal manometry, and review the current literature regarding the potential role of dysmotility in CF-related intestinal pathologies.

Objectives: We sought data on the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) as a measure of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) efficacy in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and reviewed the literature for alternative measures. Methods: We searched PubMed for the Medical Subject Heading cystic fibrosis and the key words cystic fibrosis, fat absorption, CFA, and fecal fat imbalance; historical articles; and citations in bibliographies. Results: The lower the CFA, the greater its variability; thus, it is less variable in healthy individuals who have higher CFA than pwCF. In addition, the test-retest values for CFA are more variable in pwCF than the general population. There is no correlation between CFA and body mass index or PERT dose but CFA is related to gastrointestinal signs and symptoms. Research-quality CFA studies are expensive, time consuming, and odious to pwCF and research staff. Sparse stool tests, breath tests, and blood tests of fat absorption have been studied as potential alternatives to CFA to measure PERT efficacy. Conclusions: Based on the evidence, we conclude that CFA as a measure of the efficacy of PERT is more of a “coal standard” than a gold standard; developing suitable alternatives should be a priority.