Bozena Gabryel

Dr. Bozena Gabryel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2010 in Pharmacological Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KŁKrzysztof Łabuzek
Krzysztof Łabuzek
DSDariusz Suchy
Dariusz Suchy
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel
ABAnna Bielecka
Anna Bielecka
SLSebastian Liber
Sebastian Liber
BOBogusław Okopień
Bogusław Okopień

1 January 2012 in Pharmacological Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel
AKAlicja Kost
Alicja Kost
DKDaniela Kasprowska
Daniela Kasprowska

1 March 2014 in Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TUTomasz Urbanek
Tomasz Urbanek
WKWacław Kuczmik
Wacław Kuczmik
ABAgnieszka Basta-Kaim
Agnieszka Basta-Kaim
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel

1 September 2010 in Pharmacological Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KŁKrzysztof Łabuzek
Krzysztof Łabuzek
SLSebastian Liber
Sebastian Liber
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel
BOBogusław Okopień
Bogusław Okopień

1 May 2002 in NeuroToxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel
MAMariusz Adamek
Mariusz Adamek
APAnna Pudełko
Anna Pudełko
AMAndrzej Małecki
Andrzej Małecki
HTHenryk I Trzeciak
Henryk I Trzeciak

1 November 2008 in European Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EWEdward Wylegala
Edward Wylegala
DDD. Dobrowolski
D. Dobrowolski
DTD. Tarnawska
D. Tarnawska
DJD. Janiszewska
D. Janiszewska
BGBozena Gabryel
Bozena Gabryel
USU. Siekiera
U. Siekiera
Purpose: To analyze the graft survival rate and stability of the corneal surface in patients who underwent limbal stem cell transplantation. Three surgical techniques were performed based on the origin of the ocular surface lesion: conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU), living-related conjunctival limbal autograft (lr-CLAL), and keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantations. Methods: Nonrandomized consecutive comparative case series study. Eighty-four patients (90 eyes; 31 women and 53 men; age range: 11–78 years) were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 31.2 months (range: 6–72 months). Patients were divided into three groups: CLAU, lr-CLAL, and KLAL, comprising 21, 26, and 43 eyes, respectively. Graft survival rate and clinical success of the stem cell transplantation was confirmed by impression cytology. The Kaplan Meier survival curve and generalized Peto tests were used for the analyses. Results: Graft survival rate and the regularity of the corneal surface differed significantly between the allo- and autografts. The 3-year and 6-year graft survival rates were 76.1% and 61.9%, respectively, for the autologous transplantation group, and 59.4% and 46.3%, respectively, for the allogeneic transplantation group. Corneal surface restoration correlated with positive staining for corneal epithelial cells in impression cytology. Conclusions: Significantly better long-term outcomes were achieved with autotransplantation of the limbus compared with allogeneic limbal grafts from living-related and cadaveric donors.