The purpose of this article is to examine a previously unrecognized role for the vasopressin–oxytocin (VP-OT) system in mammalian “stress-response hormesis.” The current review adds hormesis to the long list of beneficial effects of OT. Hormesis, a biphasic adaptive response to low-level stressors, is introduced here to contextualize the dynamic roles of oxytocin and vasopressin. As with hormesis, the properties of the VP-OT system are context-, time-, and dose-sensitive. Here we suggest that one key to understanding hormesis is the fact that VP and OT and their receptors function as an integrated system. The VP-OT system is capable of changing and adapting to challenges over time, including challenges necessary for survival, reproduction and sociality. Prior research suggests that many beneficial effects of OT are most apparent only following stressful experiences, possibly reflecting interactions with VP, its receptors and other components of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. The release of OT is documented following various kinds of hormetic experiences such as birth, vigorous exercise, ischemic events and the ingestion of emetics, including psychedelics. The phasic or cyclic modulation of VP and related “stress” hormones, accompanied or followed by the release of OT, creates conditions that conform to the core principles of hormesis. This concept is reviewed here in the context of other hormones including corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and urocortin, as well as cytokines. In general, VP and classic “stress hormones” support an active response, helping to quickly mobilize body systems. OT interacts with all of these, and may subsequently re-establish homeostasis and precondition the organism to deal with future stressors. However, the individual history of an organism, including epigenetic modifications of classical stress hormones such as VP, can moderate the effects of OT. Oxytocin’s effects also help to explain the important role of sociality in mammalian resilience and longevity. A hormetic perspective, focusing on a dynamic VP-OT system, offers new insights into emotional and physical disorders, especially those associated with the management of chronic stress, and helps us to understand the healing power of social behavior and perceived safety.

The authors would like to make the following correction to their published paper

In an era marked by rising stress-related disorders and cardiovascular morbidity, understanding how the brain and heart adapt to environmental, physiological, and social stressors has become an urgent biomedical priority. This review advances an integrative framework centered on sociostasis, defined as the dynamic regulation of physiological state through social interaction, and its intersection with hormesis, a biphasic adaptive response to controlled stress that enhances resilience. We focus on four evolutionarily conserved neuropeptides, vasopressin, oxytocin, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and the urocortins, which serve as molecular bridges linking social behavior, neuroendocrine signaling, autonomic regulation, and cardiovascular function. Operating within an organized autonomic architecture, these systems calibrate responses to acute and chronic stress. Their context-dependent synergy enables adaptive flexibility under manageable challenge but may promote maladaptive cardiovascular remodeling when chronically dysregulated. Genetic vulnerability, developmental adversity, and persistent psychosocial stress can shift neuroendocrine–autonomic set points, increasing susceptibility to hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and stress-induced cardiomyopathy. Conditioning and preconditioning paradigms illustrate how repeated exposure to subthreshold stressors primes cardiovascular tissues for future insults, enhancing ischemic tolerance and adaptive gene expression. We propose that cardiovascular hormesis depends not only on stimulus intensity but also on the integrity of neuroautonomic regulatory mechanisms that support recovery and flexibility. Vagal efficiency, a dynamic index of cardioinhibitory regulation, is discussed as a potential translational metric of adaptive capacity. By integrating molecular, physiological, and psychosocial perspectives, this framework conceptualizes cardiovascular resilience as an emergent property of coordinated hormetic signaling, neuropeptidergic modulation, autonomic regulation, and social buffering. Translational implications include peptide-based therapies, autonomic biofeedback, and behavioral interventions designed to enhance stress adaptability.