David A. Gudis

Dr. David A. Gudis

Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 November 2020 in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RORichard R. Orlandi
Richard R. Orlandi
TKTodd T. Kingdom
Todd T. Kingdom
TSTimothy L. Smith
Timothy L. Smith
BBBenjamin Bleier
Benjamin Bleier
ADAdam DeConde
Adam DeConde
BZBing Zhou
Bing Zhou
I. Executive Summary: Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document.Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided.Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

1 January 2012 in American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David A. GudisDavid A. Gudis
David A. Gudis
KZKe-Qing Zhao
Ke-Qing Zhao
NCNoam A. Cohen
Noam A. Cohen
Background: Cilia are complex and powerful cellular structures of the respiratory mucosa that play a critical role in airway defense. Respiratory epithelium is lined with cilia that perform an integrated and coordinated mechanism called mucociliary clearance. Mucociliary clearance is the process by which cilia transport the mucus blanket overlying respiratory mucosa to the gastrointestinal tract for ingestion. It is the primary means by which the airway clears pathogens, allergens, debris, and toxins. The complex structure and regulatory mechanisms that dictate the form and function of normal cilia are not entirely understood, but it is clear that ciliary dysfunction results in impaired respiratory defense. Methods: A literature review of the current knowledge of cilia dysfunction in chronic rhinosinsusitis was conducted. Results: Ciliary dysfunction may be primary, the result of genetic mutations resulting in abnormal cilia structure, or, more commonly, secondary, the result of environmental, infectious, or inflammatory stimuli that disrupt normal motility or coordination. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been found to have impaired mucociliary clearance. Many biochemical, environmental, and mechanical stimuli have been shown to influence ciliary beat frequency, and common microbial pathogens of respiratory mucosa such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae have developed toxins that appear to interrupt normal mucociliary function. Furthermore, inflammatory mediators known to be present in patients with CRS appear to impair secondarily mucociliary clearance. Conclusion: The goal of this article is to summarize the recent developments in the understanding of cilia dysfunction and mucociliary clearance in CRS.

3 April 2022 in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZPZara Patel
Zara Patel
EHEric H. Holbrook
Eric H. Holbrook
JTJustin H. Turner
Justin H. Turner
NANithin D. Adappa
Nithin D. Adappa
MAMark W. Albers
Mark W. Albers
CYCarol H. Yan
Carol H. Yan

20 May 2013 in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeorge A. Scangas
George A. Scangas
David A. GudisDavid A. Gudis
David A. Gudis
DKDavid W. Kennedy
David W. Kennedy

1 November 2009 in Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarcelo B. Antunes
Marcelo B. Antunes
David A. GudisDavid A. Gudis
David A. Gudis
NCNoam A. Cohen
Noam A. Cohen

1 August 2016 in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRodney J. Schlosser
Rodney J. Schlosser
JMJennifer K. Mulligan
Jennifer K. Mulligan
JHJ. Madison Hyer
J. Madison Hyer
TKTom T. Karnezis
Tom T. Karnezis
David A. GudisDavid A. Gudis
David A. Gudis
ZSZachary M. Soler
Zachary M. Soler
Olfactory dysfunction is a cardinal symptom of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), a disease that affects 12.5% of the adult population across all racial and ethnic groups.1,2 The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in CRS ranges from 30% to 80%; however, the mechanisms by which olfactory loss occurs are not always clear.3,4 Some patients have significant nasal obstruction and impaired airflow into the olfactory cleft due to polyps or edematous mucosa. Other patients have olfactory loss but without obvious airflow restriction, suggesting additional mechanisms may also be contributory.