Accurate streamflow forecasting at fine temporal and spatial scales is essential to manage the diverse hydrological behaviors of individual catchments, particularly in rapidly responding mountainous regions. This study compares three forecasting models ARIMAX, LSTM, and HEC-HMS applied to the Posina River basin in northern Italy, using 13 years of hourly hydrological data. While recent literature promotes multi-basin LSTM training for generalization, we show that a well-configured single-basin LSTM, combined with a rolling forecast strategy, can achieve comparable accuracy under high-frequency, data-constrained conditions. The physically based HEC-HMS model, calibrated for continuous simulation, provides robust peak flow prediction but requires extensive parameter tuning. ARIMAX captures baseflows but underestimates sharp hydrological events. Evaluation through NSE, KGE, and MAE shows that both LSTM and HEC-HMS outperform ARIMAX, with LSTM offering a compelling balance between accuracy and ease of implementation. This study enhances our understanding of streamflow model behavior in small basins and demonstrates that LSTM networks, despite their simplified configuration, can be reliable tools for flood forecasting in localized Alpine catchments, where physical modeling is resource-intensive and regional data for multi-basin training are often unavailable.